journal of crystal growth | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2117 / 33,955
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

journal of crystal growth

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ulakbim
Short Name journal of crystal growth
Abbreviated Name journal of crystal growth
ISSN 0022-0248
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-crystal-growth
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (117 total)

2012
Crystallization-in-emulsion process of a melted organic compound: In situ optical monitoring and simultaneous droplet and particle size measurements
Khalil, A.
Vol. 342 , pp. 99-109
350 views DOI
2018
association of serotonin receptor 2a haplotypes with obsessive–compulsive disorder and its treatment response in iranian patients: a genetic and pharmacogenetic study
;Sina M;Ahmadiani A;Asadi S;Shams J
Vol. Volume 14 , pp. 1199-1209
311 views Abstract
2012
self-reported psychopathology and health-related quality of life in heroin users treated with methadone
;Chen YZ;Huang WL;Shan JC;Lin YH;Wu Chang HC;Chang LR
Vol. 2013 , No. default , pp. 41-48
311 views Abstract
2015
epidemiological support for genetic variability at hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis and serotonergic system as risk factors for major depression
;Ching-López A;Cervilla J;Rivera M;Molina E;McKenney K;Ruiz-Perez I;Rodríguez-Barranco M;Gutiérrez B
Vol. 2015 , No. default , pp. 2743-2754
309 views Abstract
2015
sex differences in tgfb-β signaling with respect to age of onset and cognitive functioning in schizophrenia
;Frydecka D;Misiak B;Pawlak-Adamska E;Karabon L;Tomkiewicz A;Sedlaczek P;Kiejna A;Beszłej JA
Vol. 2015 , No. default , pp. 575-584
307 views Abstract
2015
cognitive dysfunction in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia: a systematic review of meta-analyses
;Bortolato B;Miskowiak KW;Köhler CA;Vieta E;Carvalho AF
Vol. 2015 , No. Issue 1 , pp. 3111-3125
301 views Abstract
2016
a longitudinal, event-related potential pilot study of adult obsessive-compulsive disorder with 1-year follow-up
;Yamamuro K;Okada K;Kishimoto N;Ota T;Iida J;Kishimoto T
Vol. Volume 12 , pp. 2463-2471
279 views Abstract
2011
management of traumatic events: influence of emotion-centered coping strategies on the occurrence of dissociation and post-traumatic stress disorder
;Georges Brousse;Benjamin Arnaud;Jordane Dur;Roger;et al
Vol. 2011 , No. default , pp. 127-133
277 views Abstract
2020
Influence of the reducing agent on the formation and morphology of the bismuth telluride nanostructures by using template assisted chemical process: From nanowires to ultrathin nanotubes
Ketharachapalli, B.
Vol. 533 , pp. 0-0
276 views DOI
2018
a comparison of psychological well-being and quality of life between spouse and non-spouse caregivers in patients with head and neck cancer: a 6-month follow-up study
;Lee Y;Lin PY;Chien CY;Fang FM;Wang LJ
Vol. Volume 14 , pp. 1697-1704
276 views Abstract
View All 117 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.