meditsinskaia radiologiia | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2329 / 33,955
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

meditsinskaia radiologiia

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name meditsinskaia radiologiia
Abbreviated Name meditsinskaia radiologiia
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (151 total)

2010
synthesis, spectral and single crystal x-ray structural studies on bis(2,2’-bipyridine)sulphidom(ii) (m = cu or zn) and diaqua 2,2’-bipyridine zinc(ii)sulphate dihydrate
;ARUMUGAM MANOHAR;KUPPUKANNU RAMALINGAM;GABRIELE BOCELLI;ANDREA CANTONI
Vol. 75 , No. 8 , pp. 1085-1092
361 views Abstract
2017
the physicochemical and thermodynamic properties of the choline chloride-based deep eutectic solvents
;Troter Dragan Z.;Todorović Zoran B.;Đokić-Stojanović Dušica R.;Đorđević Biljana S.;Todorović Vanja M.;Konstantinović Sandra S.;Veljković Vlada B.
Vol. 82 , No. 9 , pp. 1039-1052
353 views DOI Abstract
2016
effect of principal and secondary ligands on the electronic structures and spectra of a series of ruthenium(ii) complexes
;Zhang Yanli;Li Jieqiong;Wang Li
Vol. 81 , No. 5 , pp. 521-539
339 views DOI Abstract
2016
comparison of sequential and single extraction in order to estimate environmental impact of metals from fly ash
;Tasić Aleksandra M.;Sredović-Ignjatović Ivana D.;Ignjatović Ljubiša M.;Ilić Marija A.;Antić Mališa P.
Vol. 81 , No. 9 , pp. 1081-1096
338 views DOI Abstract
2013
fe3o4 nanoparticles: a highly efficient and easily reusable catalyst for the one-pot synthesis of xanthene derivatives under solvent-free conditions
;Ghasemzadeh Ali Mohammad;Safaei-Ghomi Javad;Zahedi Safura
Vol. 78 , No. 6 , pp. 769-779
326 views DOI Abstract
2004
nickel(ii) cyclohexylethyldithiocarbamate complexes with monodentate p-donor ligands in the coordination sphere
;MAREK PAVLICEK;ZDENEK SINDALAR;MICHAL MALON;RICHARD PASTOREK;JOSEF HUSAREK
Vol. 69 , No. 12 , pp. 1053-1061
299 views Abstract
2016
novel negatively-charged membrane adsorbers made using combination of photopolymerization and immersion precipitation
;Tomković Tanja;Radovanović Filip;Grgur Branimir;Nastasović Aleksandra;Vasiljević-Radović Dana;Onjia Antonije
Vol. 81 , No. 4 , pp. 419-431
297 views DOI Abstract
2007
structural effects of metallic chromium on its electrochemical behavior
;VELIMIR RADMILOVIC;JOVAN P. POPIC;DRAGUTIN M. DRAZIC;BORE JEGDIC
Vol. 72 , No. 6 , pp. 563-578
291 views Abstract
1979
21OPo excretion after inhalational uptake in natural metabolism and on oxathiol administration
Gus'kova, A.
Vol. 24 , pp. 46-54
289 views
2017
silicon electrodeposition from chloride-fluoride melts containing k2sif6 and sio2
;Zhuk Sergey I.;Isaev Vladimir A.;Grishenkova Olga V.;Isakov Andrey V.;Apisarov Alexey P.;Zaykov Yurii P.
Vol. 82 , No. 1 , pp. 51-62
288 views DOI Abstract
View All 151 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.