The Journal of investigative dermatology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1105 / 33,950
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

The Journal of investigative dermatology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name J Invest Dermatol
Abbreviated Name j invest dermatol
ISSN 1523-1747
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/journal-of-investigative-dermatology
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (132 total)

2012
automated quantitative analysis of p53, cyclin d1, ki67 and perk expression in breast carcinoma does not differ from expert pathologist scoring and correlates with clinico-pathological characteristics
;Yolanda Madarnas;Sandip K. SenGupta;Bruce E. Elliott;Jeremy Squire;Leda H. Raptis;Ashish B. Rajput;Andrew G. Day;Waheed Sangrar;Sonal Varma;Jamaica D. Cass
Vol. 4 , No. 3 , pp. 725-742
398 views DOI Abstract
2018
towards a clinical decision support system for external beam radiation oncology prostate cancer patients: proton vs. photon radiotherapy? a radiobiological study of robustness and stability
;Seán Walsh;Erik Roelofs;Peter Kuess;Yvonka van Wijk;Ben Vanneste;Andre Dekker;Philippe Lambin;Bleddyn Jones;Dietmar Georg;Frank Verhaegen
Vol. 10 , No. 2 , pp. 55-
378 views DOI Abstract
2015
the hedgehog signalling pathway in cell migration and guidance: what we have learned from drosophila melanogaster
;Sofia J. Araújo
Vol. 7 , No. 4 , pp. 2012-2022
374 views DOI Abstract
2018
targeting pancreatic cancer cell plasticity: the latest in therapeutics
;Jacob M. Smigiel;Neetha Parameswaran;Mark W. Jackson
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 14-
369 views DOI Abstract
2011
gold nanostructures as a platform for combinational therapy in future cancer therapeutics
;Salomeh Jelveh;Devika B. Chithrani
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 1081-1110
344 views DOI Abstract
2018
pharmacokinetics of sublingually delivered fentanyl in head and neck cancer patients treated with curatively aimed chemo or bioradiotherapy
;Evelien J. M. Kuip;Wendy H. Oldenmenger;Esther Oomen-de Hoop;Gerda M. Verduijn;Martine F. Thijs-Visser;Peter de Bruijn;Esther van Meerten;Stijn L. W. Koolen;Ron H. J. Mathijssen;Carin C. D. van der Rijt
Vol. 10 , No. 11 , pp. 445-
339 views DOI Abstract
2018
signal-targeted therapies and resistance mechanisms in pancreatic cancer: future developments reside in proteomics
;Célia Cintas;Thibaut Douché;Nicole Therville;Silvia Arcucci;Fernanda Ramos-Delgado;Céline Basset;Benoît Thibault;Julie Guillermet-Guibert
Vol. 10 , No. 6 , pp. 174-
339 views DOI Abstract
2013
immune-checkpoint blockade and active immunotherapy for glioma
;Brian J. Ahn;Ian F. Pollack;Hideho Okada
Vol. 5 , No. 4 , pp. 1379-1412
327 views DOI Abstract
1998
A novel human type II cytokeratin, K6hf, specifically expressed in the companion layer of the hair follicle
Winter H;Langbein L;Praetzel S;Jacobs M;Rogers MA;Leigh IM;Tidman N;Schweizer J;;
Vol. 111 , No. 6 , pp. -
314 views Abstract
2010
the evolution of biomarkers in thyroid cancer—from mass screening to a personalized biosignature
;Raymon H. Grogan;Elliot J. Mitmaker;Orlo H. Clark
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 885-912
310 views DOI Abstract
View All 132 Articles
40
Overall
Below Average
31
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.0/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.