Indexed in Journament

journal of molecular cell biology

ISSN 1759-4685· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
43.9 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #497 of 29,298 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
56 Articles
Scores higher than 98.3% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name j mol cell biol
Abbreviated Name j mol cell biol
ISSN 1759-4685
URL https://academic.oup.com/jmcb

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.8
Accessibility 20.0
Timeliness 80.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 7.9
Content Distribution 51.7
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for journal of molecular cell biology
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.8 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 22.5
Timeliness 80.0 3.0
Diversity 22.7
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 7.9 4.2
Content Distribution 51.7 88.7
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (56)

2012
composition and bioactive properties of yerba mate (llex paraguariensis a. st.-hil.): a review composición y propiedades bioactivas de la yerba mate (ilex paraguariensis a. st.-hil.): una revisión
Vol. 72 , No. 2 , pp. 268-275
369 views Abstract
2014
effect of 6-benzyl-aminopurine and thidiazuron on in vitro shoot organogenesis of aloe vera (l.) burm. f
Vol. 74 , No. 4 , pp. 497-501
325 views DOI Abstract
2026
Jer1–Ga2–LpR1 axis mediates upstream input of alpha-mannosidosis
10 views DOI Abstract
2026
MAD2B guides chromosome stability in mitosis via the MAD2B–CIP2A signaling axis
10 views DOI Abstract
2026
Immune licensing of exercise: B cells wire a liver–muscle glutamate axis
10 views DOI Abstract
2026
LAMTOR1 sorts APP to late endosomes via AP-3-mediated trafficking
12 views DOI Abstract
2026
ALKBH3 is an NPM1-dependent nucleolar protein required for rRNA biogenesis and translation
19 views DOI Abstract
2026
Topoisomerase 1 initiates biliary-derived liver regeneration through the Dnmt1–p53 axis
17 views DOI Abstract
2026
FBXO6 ubiquitinates MAOA to promote monoamine neurotransmitter accumulation and tumor growth in HCC
21 views DOI Abstract
2026
LPA deficiency in follicular fluid linked to impaired oocyte maturation through BCAA metabolism-mediated mitochondrial dysfunction
16 views DOI Abstract
2026
Loss of the cardiac-enriched mitochondrial transporter SLC25A34 promotes heart failure by attenuating fatty acid oxidation
16 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
43.9/100 · Below Average
Ranked #497 of 29,298 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

43.9/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

80.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

51.7/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.