acta paediatrica (oslo, norway : 1992) | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1237 / 33,938
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
41
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

acta paediatrica (oslo, norway : 1992)

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name acta paediatr
Abbreviated Name acta paediatr
ISSN 1651-2227
Aim and Scope
URL http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1651-2227
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (170 total)

2017
comparison of education group strategies and home visits in type 2 diabetes mellitus: clinical trial
;Jéssica Caroline dos Santos;Daniel Nogueira Cortez;Maísa Mara Lopes Macedo;Edna Afonso Reis;Ilka Afonso Reis;Heloísa Carvalho Torres
Vol. 25 , pp. -
519 views DOI Abstract
2007
Women's involvement in household decision-making and strengthening social capital-crucial factors for child survival in Ethiopia
Fantahun M;Berhane Y;Wall S;Byass P;Högberg U;;
Vol. 96 , No. 4 , pp. -
464 views Abstract
nursing interventions in monitoring the adolescent with cystic fibrosis: a literature review
;Maria da Conceição Marinho Sousa Ribeiro Oliveira Reisinho;Bárbara Pereira Gomes
Vol. 24 , pp. -
456 views DOI Abstract
2005
tempo de permanência de enfermeiros em um hospital-escola e valores monetários despendidos nos processos de admissão, desligamento e provimento de novo profissional tiempo de permanencia de enfermeras en un hospital-escuela y su relación con el monto gasto en la admisión, salida y provisión de nuevo profesional time of permanence of nurses at a school-hospital and expenses related to admission, resignation and hiring of a new professional
;Flávia Lilalva de Holanda;Isabel Cristina Kowal Olm Cunha
Vol. 13 , No. 5 , pp. 642-647
414 views DOI Abstract
2011
markers of vulnerability for cervical cancer in hiv-infected women marcadores de vulnerabilidad al cáncer de cuello uterino en mujeres infectadas por el hiv marcadores de vulnerabilidade ao câncer de colo do útero em mulheres infectadas pelo hiv
;Daniele Mary Silva de Brito;Marli Teresinha Gimeniz Galvão;Maria Lúcia Duarte Pereira
Vol. 19 , No. 3 , pp. 500-507
409 views DOI Abstract
1994
Eosinophil cationic protein in nasal secretion and in serum and myeloperoxidase in serum in respiratory syncytial virus bronchiolitis: relation to asthma and atopy
Sigurs N;Bjarnason R;Sigurbergsson F;;
Vol. 83 , No. 11 , pp. -
403 views Abstract
2013
analysis of occupational accidents with biological material among professionals in pre-hospital services análisis de los accidentes ocupacionales con material biológico entre profesionales en servicios de atención prehospitalaria análise dos acidentes ocupacionais com material biológico entre profissionais em serviços de atendimento pré-hospitalar
;Adriana Cristina de Oliveira;Maria Henriqueta Rocha Siqueira Paiva
Vol. 21 , No. 1 , pp. 309-315
399 views Abstract
2012
the nursing care system from a luhmannian perspective sistema de cuidado de enfermería en la perspectiva luhmanniana sistema de cuidado de enfermagem na perspectiva luhmanniana
;Dirce Stein Backes;Marli Stein Backes;Camila Biazus Dalcin;Alacoque Lorenzini Erdmann
Vol. 20 , No. 5 , pp. 873-879
390 views DOI Abstract
2018
nursing care interpersonal relationship questionnaire: elaboration and validation
;José Wicto Pereira Borges;Thereza Maria Magalhães Moreira;Dalton Franscisco de Andrade
Vol. 25 , pp. -
379 views DOI Abstract
2015
comparative analysis of non-adherence to medication treatment for systemic arterial hypertension in urban and rural populations
;Patricia Magnabosco;Eliana Cavalari Teraoka;Edward Meirelles de Oliveira;Elisangela Aparecida Felipe;Dayana Freitas;Leila Maria Marchi-Alves
Vol. 23 , No. 1 , pp. 20-27
378 views DOI Abstract
View All 170 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
41
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

40.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.