Indexed in Journament

gastrointestinal endoscopy

ISSN 1097-6779· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
39.5/100
Journament Score
#7,560
Journament Rank
117
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name gastrointest endosc
Abbreviated Name gastrointest endosc
ISSN 1097-6779
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/gastrointestinal-endoscopy

Indexings

ncbi ulakbim sci

Publications Per Year

Articles (117)

2020
Results of duodenoscope culture and quarantine after manufacturer-recommended cleaning process.
443 views DOI Abstract
2019
Development and validation of a web-based electronic application in managing antithrombotic agents in patients undergoing GI endoscopy.
398 views DOI Abstract
2007
differences of metal concentrations and morpho-anatomical adaptations between obligate and facultative serpentinophytes from western serbia
Vol. 59 , No. 4 , pp. 341-349
381 views DOI Abstract
2014
the role of single nucleotide polymorphisms of cytokine genes in viral infections
Vol. 66 , No. 2 , pp. 595-600
346 views DOI Abstract
2013
ecophysiological and biochemical traits of three herbaceous plants growing on the disposed coal combustion fly ash of different weathering stage
Vol. 65 , No. 4 , pp. 1651-1667
308 views DOI Abstract
2020
New insights on missed colonic lesions during colonoscopy through artificial intelligence-assisted real-time detection (with video).
302 views DOI Abstract
2019
Ergonomic endoscopy: An oxymoron or realistic goal?
298 views DOI Abstract
2010
in vitro synergistic antibacterial activity of salvia officinalis l. and some preservatives
Vol. 62 , No. 1 , pp. 167-174
298 views DOI Abstract
2007
effect of chilling and acclimation on the activity of glutamine synthetase isoforms in maize seedlings
Vol. 59 , No. 3 , pp. 177-185
281 views DOI Abstract
2013
glycated hemoglobin in camel: minimal correlation with blood glucose level
Vol. 65 , No. 3 , pp. 911-917
280 views DOI Abstract
2020
New insights on missed colonic lesions during colonoscopy through artificial intelligence-assisted real-time detection (with video).
302 views DOI Abstract
2020
Results of duodenoscope culture and quarantine after manufacturer-recommended cleaning process.
443 views DOI Abstract
2020
Metastasis to gastrostomy sites from upper aerodigestive tract malignancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
229 views DOI Abstract
2019
A Gender Comparison of Motivations for Seeking Leadership Positions Among Gastroenterologists.
216 views DOI Abstract
2019
Narrow-band imaging for scar classification: from conception to multicenter validation.
215 views DOI Abstract
2019
Ergonomic endoscopy: An oxymoron or realistic goal?
298 views DOI Abstract
2019
Development and validation of a web-based electronic application in managing antithrombotic agents in patients undergoing GI endoscopy.
398 views DOI Abstract
2018
therapeutic effects of polysaccharides extracted from porphyra yezoensis in rats with cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury
Vol. 70 , No. 2 , pp. 233-239
251 views DOI Abstract
2017
velvetleaf (abutilon theophrasti medik.) productivity in competitive conditions
Vol. 69 , No. 1 , pp. 157-166
160 views DOI Abstract
2016
potential anticancer activity of curcumin analogs containing sulfone on human cancer cells
Vol. 68 , No. 1 , pp. 125-133
216 views DOI Abstract
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

39.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.