gastrointestinal endoscopy | Journament

Journal Ranking

#5185 / 33,971
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.5/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

gastrointestinal endoscopy

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name gastrointest endosc
Abbreviated Name gastrointest endosc
ISSN 1097-6779
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/gastrointestinal-endoscopy
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (117 total)

2020
Results of duodenoscope culture and quarantine after manufacturer-recommended cleaning process.
Mark, Jacob;Underberg, Karin;Kramer, Robert;
436 views DOI Abstract
2019
Development and validation of a web-based electronic application in managing antithrombotic agents in patients undergoing GI endoscopy.
Nutalapati, Venkat;Tokala, Krishna Teja;Desai, Madhav;Kanakadandi, Vijay;Olyaee, Mojtaba;Parasa, Sravanthi;Rastogi, Amit;
389 views DOI Abstract
2007
differences of metal concentrations and morpho-anatomical adaptations between obligate and facultative serpentinophytes from western serbia
;Dudić B.;Rakić Tamara;Šinžar-Sekulić Jasmina;Atanacković Valentina;Stevanović Branka
Vol. 59 , No. 4 , pp. 341-349
373 views DOI Abstract
2014
the role of single nucleotide polymorphisms of cytokine genes in viral infections
;Ćupić Maja;Pravica Vera;Lazarević Ivana;Banko Ana;Karalić Danijela;Tasić Dijana;Jovanović Tanja
Vol. 66 , No. 2 , pp. 595-600
337 views DOI Abstract
2013
ecophysiological and biochemical traits of three herbaceous plants growing on the disposed coal combustion fly ash of different weathering stage
;Gajić Gordana;Pavlović P.;Kostić Olga;Jarić Snežana;Đurđević Lola;Pavlović Dragana;Mitrović Miroslava
Vol. 65 , No. 4 , pp. 1651-1667
303 views DOI Abstract
2019
Ergonomic endoscopy: An oxymoron or realistic goal?
Shergill, Amandeep K;McQuaid, Kenneth R;
294 views DOI Abstract
2020
New insights on missed colonic lesions during colonoscopy through artificial intelligence-assisted real-time detection (with video).
Lui, Thomas Kl;Hui, Cynthia Ky;Tsui, Vivien Wm;Cheung, Ka Shing;Ko, Michael Kl;aCC Foo, Dominic;Mak, Lung Yi;Yeung, Chun Kwong;Lui, Tim Hw;Wong, Siu Yin;Leung, Wai K;
293 views DOI Abstract
2010
in vitro synergistic antibacterial activity of salvia officinalis l. and some preservatives
;Stanojević Dragana;Čomić Ljiljana;Stefanović Olgica;Solujić-Sukdolak Slavica
Vol. 62 , No. 1 , pp. 167-174
287 views DOI Abstract
2007
effect of chilling and acclimation on the activity of glutamine synthetase isoforms in maize seedlings
;Simonović Ana D.;Anderson M.D.
Vol. 59 , No. 3 , pp. 177-185
275 views DOI Abstract
2013
glycated hemoglobin in camel: minimal correlation with blood glucose level
;Bazzi Mohammad D.;Quazani Mushari;Rabbani Nayyar;Malik Ajamaluddin;Al Hasan Mohammed;Elrobh Mohammed S.;Al Senaidy Abdulrahman M.
Vol. 65 , No. 3 , pp. 911-917
272 views DOI Abstract
View All 117 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.