Indexed in Journament

telematika

ISSN 0000-0000· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
37.3 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #7,529 of 29,330 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
52 Articles
Scores higher than 74.3% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name telematika
Abbreviated Name telematika
ISSN 0000-0000

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.5
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 7.1
Content Distribution 72.3
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for telematika
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.3
Accessibility 18.3
Timeliness 0.0 12.6
Diversity 27.3
Innovation 70.0 28.9
Community Impact 7.1 9.7
Content Distribution 72.3 88.5
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (52)

2015
health literacy impact on national healthcare utilization and expenditure
Vol. 4 , No. 11 , pp. 747-755
543 views DOI Abstract
2018
comparing the income elasticity of health spending in middle-income and high-income countries: the role of financial protection
Vol. 7 , No. 3 , pp. 255-263
382 views DOI Abstract
2016
expanded hta: enhancing fairness and legitimacy
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 1-3
381 views DOI Abstract
2016
key ethical issues discussed at cdc-sponsored international, regional meetings to explore cultural perspectives and contexts on pandemic influenza preparedness and response
Vol. 5 , No. 11 , pp. 653-662
366 views DOI Abstract
2014
APLIKASI PENCARIAN ANDROID PACKAGE (APK) BERBASIS WEB DAN MOBILE WEB DENGAN API
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. -
356 views Abstract
2010
SISTEM INFORMASI RUMAH SAKIT BERBASIS WEB MENGGUNAKAN JAVA SERVER PAGES
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. -
353 views Abstract
2018
comparing the income elasticity of health spending in middle-income and high-income countries: the role of financial protection
Vol. 7 , No. 3 , pp. 255-263
382 views DOI Abstract
2017
a case for open network health systems: systems as networks in public mental health
Vol. 6 , No. 3 , pp. 129-133
33 views DOI Abstract
2017
erosion of trust in the medical profession in india: time for doctors to act
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 5-8
263 views DOI Abstract
2017
a cost analysis of the jan aushadhi scheme in india
Vol. 6 , No. 4 , pp. 253-256
156 views DOI Abstract
2017
multisectoral actions for health: challenges and opportunities in complex policy environments
Vol. 6 , No. 7 , pp. 359-363
319 views DOI Abstract
2016
strategic management in the healthcare sector: the debate about the resource-based view flourishes in response to recent commentaries
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 145-146
149 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
37.3/100 · Poor
Ranked #7,529 of 29,330 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

37.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

72.3/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.