Indexed in Journament

telematika

ISSN 0000-0000· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
38.8/100
Journament Score
#10,998
Journament Rank
52
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name telematika
Abbreviated Name telematika
ISSN 0000-0000

Indexings

doaj

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (52)

2015
health literacy impact on national healthcare utilization and expenditure
; Rafia Rasu; Walter Agbor Bawa; Richard Suminski; Kathleen Snella; Bradley Warady
Vol. 4 , No. 11 , pp. 747-755
534 views DOI Abstract
2016
power and politics in the global health landscape: beliefs, competition and negotiation among global advocacy coalitions in the policy-making process
;Lori McDougall
Vol. 5 , No. 5 , pp. 309-320
461 views DOI Abstract
2018
comparing the income elasticity of health spending in middle-income and high-income countries: the role of financial protection
;Arturo Vargas Bustamante;Sandhya V. Shimoga
Vol. 7 , No. 3 , pp. 255-263
369 views DOI Abstract
2015
healthcare reimbursement and quality improvement: integration using the electronic medical record; comment on “fee-for-service payment - an evil practice that must be stamped out?”
;John R. Britton
Vol. 4 , No. 8 , pp. 549-551
369 views DOI Abstract
2016
expanded hta: enhancing fairness and legitimacy
;Norman Daniels ;Thalia Porteny;Julian Urritia
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 1-3
368 views DOI Abstract
2015
nhs values, compassion and quality indicators for relationship based person-centred healthcare; comment on “morality and markets in the nhs”
;John Cox
Vol. 4 , No. 6 , pp. 407-408
365 views DOI Abstract
2015
the chinese healthcare challenge; comment on “shanghai rising: avoidable mortality as measured by avoidable mortality since 2000”
;Guilhem Fabre
Vol. 4 , No. 3 , pp. 195-197
360 views DOI Abstract
2016
key ethical issues discussed at cdc-sponsored international, regional meetings to explore cultural perspectives and contexts on pandemic influenza preparedness and response
;Aun Lor;James C. Thomas;Drue H. Barrett;Leonard W. Ortmann;Dionisio J. Herrera Guibert
Vol. 5 , No. 11 , pp. 653-662
357 views DOI Abstract
2014
APLIKASI PENCARIAN ANDROID PACKAGE (APK) BERBASIS WEB DAN MOBILE WEB DENGAN API
Hafsah, Hafsah;Rustamadji, Heru Cahya;Sriyono, Alek Syamsudin;
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. -
346 views Abstract
2010
SISTEM INFORMASI RUMAH SAKIT BERBASIS WEB MENGGUNAKAN JAVA SERVER PAGES
Rustamaji, Heru Cahya;
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. -
345 views Abstract
2018
tapping the power of soda taxes: a call for multidisciplinary research and broad-based advocacy coalitions – a response to the recent commentaries
;Sarah A. Roache;Lawrence O. Gostin
Vol. 7 , No. 7 , pp. 674-676
270 views DOI
2018
comparing the income elasticity of health spending in middle-income and high-income countries: the role of financial protection
;Arturo Vargas Bustamante;Sandhya V. Shimoga
Vol. 7 , No. 3 , pp. 255-263
369 views DOI Abstract
2018
all health partnerships, great and small: comparing mandated with emergent health partnerships; comment on “evaluating global health partnerships: a case study of a gavi hpv vaccine application process in uganda”
;Elaine Green;Dan Ritman;Graeme Chisholm
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 89-91
255 views DOI Abstract
2017
a case for open network health systems: systems as networks in public mental health
;Michael Grant Rhodes;Marten W. de Vries
Vol. 6 , No. 3 , pp. 129-133
25 views DOI Abstract
2017
erosion of trust in the medical profession in india: time for doctors to act
;Sumit Kane;Michael Calnan
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 5-8
252 views DOI Abstract
2017
a cost analysis of the jan aushadhi scheme in india
;Kanchan Mukherjee
Vol. 6 , No. 4 , pp. 253-256
147 views DOI Abstract
2017
multisectoral actions for health: challenges and opportunities in complex policy environments
;Viroj Tangcharoensathien;Orapan Srisookwatana;Poldej Pinprateep;Tipicha Posayanonda;Walaiporn Patcharanarumol
Vol. 6 , No. 7 , pp. 359-363
309 views DOI Abstract
2016
strategic management in the healthcare sector: the debate about the resource-based view flourishes in response to recent commentaries
;Ewan Ferlie;Tessa Crilly;Ashok Jashapara; Susan Trenholm;Anna Peckham;Graeme Currie
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 145-146
138 views DOI Abstract
2016
new 2016 mesh addressing information gap, poverty, violence and danger of medicine set the tone for policy-makers in patient care
;Marc Jamoulle
Vol. 5 , No. 6 , pp. 397-398
254 views DOI
2016
from headline to hard grind: the importance of understanding public administration in achieving health outcomes comment on “understanding the role of public administration in implementing action on the social determinants of health and health inequities”
;Janine O’Flynn
Vol. 5 , No. 7 , pp. 439-442
262 views DOI Abstract
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.