all health partnerships, great and small: comparing mandated with emergent health partnerships; comment on “evaluating global health partnerships: a case study of a gavi hpv vaccine application process in uganda”

Clicks: 181
ID: 145363
2018
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality Improving Quality
0.0 /100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
The plurality of healthcare providers and funders in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) has given rise to an era in which health partnerships are becoming the norm in international development. Whether mandated or emergent, three common drivers are essential for ensuring successful health partnerships: trust; a diverse and inclusive network; and a clear governance structure. Mandated and emergent health partnerships operate as very different models and at different scales. However, there is potential for sharing and learning between these types of partnerships. Emergent health partnerships, especially as they scale up, may learn from mandated partnerships about establishing clear governance mandates for larger and more complex partnerships. By combining social network analysis, which can detect key actors and stakeholders that could add value to existing emergent partnerships, with Brinkerhoff’s comprehensive framework for partnership evaluation, we can identify a set of tools that could be used to evaluate the effectiveness and sustainability of emergent health partnerships.
Reference Key
green2018internationalall Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors ;Elaine Green;Dan Ritman;Graeme Chisholm
Journal telematika
Year 2018
DOI
10.15171/IJHPM.2017.68
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.