Indexed in Journament

political science quarterly

ISSN 0032-3195· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
37.3 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #10,786 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
75 Articles
Scores higher than 63.2% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name political science quarterly
Abbreviated Name political science quarterly
ISSN 0032-3195

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.2 30.1
Accessibility 15.0 17.9
Timeliness 100.0 19.2
Diversity 30.0 28.8
Innovation 40.0 31.2
Community Impact 31.0 13.4
Content Distribution 19.5 88.4
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (75)

2011
frequency of congenital craniofacial malformations in a brazilian reference center frequência de malformações congênitas craniofaciais em um centro de referência brasileiro
;Lívia Máris Ribeiro Paranaíba;Roseli Teixeira de Miranda;Leila Aparecida Ribeiro;Letízia Monteiro de Barros;Hercílio Martelli-Júnior
Vol. 14 , No. 1 , pp. 151-160
288 views DOI Abstract
2019
Explaining why some muslims support islamist political violence
Fair, C.
Vol. 134 , pp. 245-276
264 views DOI
1959
The Passing of Traditional Society: Modernizing the Middle East, <i>by Daniel Lerner and Lucille W. Pevsner</i>
Elie Salem
51 views DOI Abstract
2004
Diminished Democracy: From Membership to Management in American Civic Life
James A. Morone
50 views DOI Abstract
2004
Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics
Barry M. Blechman
45 views DOI Abstract
2005
The Colonial Present: Afghanistan, Palestine, Iraq
Charles Tilly
42 views DOI Abstract
2001
Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality
Wayne D. Moore
41 views DOI Abstract
1999
Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed
R. Bin Wong
40 views DOI Abstract
2005
Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics
David Clinton
39 views DOI Abstract
2000
Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community
Robert Y. Shapiro
31 views DOI Abstract
2026
Correction to: Dominance through Division: Group-Based Clientelism in Japan <i>by Amy Catalinac</i>
6 views DOI
2026
Correction to: Realignments of the Twenty-first Century: A Review of  <i>Polarized by Degrees</i> , by Matt Grossmann and David Hopkins
9 views DOI
2026
Every Firm for Itself: Corporate Lobbying and the Domestic Politics of Intra-Industry Trade <i>by Mary Anne Madeira</i>
Iain Osgood
10 views DOI Abstract
2026
Taxation and Resentment: Race, Party, and Class in American Tax Attitudes <i>by Andrea Louise Campbell</i>
Chris Faricy
10 views DOI Abstract
2026
Varieties of Power: Women’s Political Representation in Arab Parliaments <i>by Marwa Shalaby</i>
Yuree Noh
12 views DOI
2026
The Politics of Public Pensions: Parties, State Governments, and Unions <i>by Carolyn Abott</i>
John Brooks
11 views DOI Abstract
2026
Good Change: The Rise and Fall of Poland's Illiberal Revolution <i>by Stanley Bill and Ben Stanley</i>
Anna Gwiazda
11 views DOI Abstract
2026
Inside Criminalized Governance: How and Why Gangs Rule the Streets of Rio de Janeiro <i>by Nicholas Barnes</i>
Melissa Martinez
22 views DOI Abstract
2026
Overseen or Overlooked? Legislators, Armed Forces, and Democratic Accountability <i>by David P. Auerswald, Philippe Lagassé, and Stephen M. Saideman</i>
Erica De Bruin
22 views DOI Abstract
2026
A Presidency Transformed, A Democracy in Danger
William G. Howell, Terry M. Moe
20 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
37.3/100 · Poor
Ranked #10,786 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

31.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

100.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

19.5/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.