From Frontiers to Borders: How Colonial Technicians Created Modern Territoriality by Kerry Goettlich

Clicks: 3
ID: 333261
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #77 of 80 articles by views in political science quarterly

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Kerry Goettlich challenges a long-standing tendency in international relations to treat linear borders as a natural consequence of territorial sovereignty. His main argument is simple yet significant. Sovereign states do not automatically produce linear borders. That form arises from the practices of delimitation, demarcation, surveying, and mapping, which translate space into technical descriptions, coordinates, markers, and administrative procedures (26–39, 58–60). By separating the history of sovereignty from the history of linearity, Goettlich shifts the focus from legal doctrine to the technical work that enables territories to acquire a stable political form. The historical evidence in this book moves from North America to British India and then to the professionalization of boundary expertise. The case of the thirteen colonies demonstrates that property surveying and intercolonial disputes could drive linearization even before the consolidation of the modern sovereign state (78–79, 102–103). British India provides even stronger evidence. From the late eighteenth century onward, the production of information, surveys, and colonial administration formed a knowledge infrastructure that later underpinned boundary-making in Afghanistan, Persia, and Central Asia (116–117, 136–143). Goettlich also demonstrates how Thomas Holdich, Ellen Churchill Semple, and Lord George Curzon helped transform borders into objects of scientific expertise before the Paris Peace Conference granted experts more direct access to territorial decisions (156–157, 188–197).
Reference Key
openalex_W7223121626 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Virdika Rizky Utama
Journal political science quarterly
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/psquar/qqag116
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/psquar/qqag116
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.