Ties That Bound: Slavery and Power in Africa J. C. Sharman

Clicks: 3
ID: 333312
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #80 of 80 articles by views in political science quarterly

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
J. C. Sharman is a prolific scholar who publishes a book every eighteen months. His latest is Ties That Bound: Slavery and Power in Africa, an application of lessons learned from his book Empires of the Weak. Both emphasize the inability of Western European empires to dominate the people they encountered in the early modern era. For an economic historian, this is reminiscent of exactly the argument made by Acemoglu, Johnson, and Robinson, the 2024 recipients of the Nobel Prize in Economic Science, who argue that settler mortality rates around the world can predict where the empires were weakest. Unfortunately, their works will not be found in the bibliography at the end of Ties That Bound, nor will any of the modern economic history of Africa, including works by this reviewer. That may be a curse and a blessing: another example of historians and economic historians not talking to each other but creating the possibility of independent confirmations, like two tests of the same hypothesis. In this case, the possibility is a live one. Both disciplines hypothesize that the fundamental determinant of precolonial African development is land abundance, or low population density, an environmental feature that incentivized both the gravitational pull of slavery (a tie that bounds) and the centrifugal push of political decentralization (weak power to bind). Economic historians approach the problem by controlling for the political power to bind and then looking to see if land abundance increases slavery. Sharman integrate the two, arguing that slavery is the path to political power. One static, the other dynamic. The dynamic model is the better one but harder to test.
Reference Key
openalex_W7223155505 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Warren C. Whatley
Journal political science quarterly
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/psquar/qqag122
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/psquar/qqag122
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.