toxicology letters | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3188 / 33,958
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 4 weeks ago

toxicology letters

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name toxicol lett
Abbreviated Name toxicol lett
ISSN 1879-3169
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/505519/description#description
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (83 total)

2017
study the association of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with early endothelial dysfunction and its impact on cardiovascular system by estimating urinary albumin creatinine ratio
;Anand Agrawal;Renu Garg;Dibakar Sahu;Mukesh Kumar
Vol. 34 , No. 2 , pp. 138-143
494 views DOI Abstract
2010
assessment of the effectiveness of sustained release bupropion and intensive physician advice in smoking cessation
;Singh Pranav;Kumar Raj
Vol. 27 , No. 1 , pp. 11-18
464 views Abstract
2013
level of awareness about tuberculosis in urban slums: implications for advocacy and communication strategy planning in the national program
;Palanivel Chinnakali;Jayalakshmy Ramakrishnan;Kavita Vasudevan;Jayanthi Gurumurthy;Ravi P Upadhyay;Krishna C Panigrahi
Vol. 30 , No. 2 , pp. 139-142
448 views DOI Abstract
2019
Comparison of the toxic mechanism of T-2 toxin and deoxynivalenol on human chondrocytes by microarray and bioinformatics analysis.
Yang, Lei;Wang, Suiqin;Zhao, Guanghui;Wang, Xi;Guo, Xiong;
446 views DOI Abstract
2018
high-resolution computerized tomography changes in diffuse parenchymal lung disease from chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis related to bird antigen
;Parthasarathi Bhattacharyya;Sanjukta Dasgupta;Mintu Paul;Dipanjan Saha;Sayoni Sengupta;Pinak Pani Bhattacharyya
Vol. 35 , No. 3 , pp. 215-219
420 views DOI Abstract
2015
pulmonary hydatidosis in a tertiary care hospital
;Rajpal Singh Punia;Reetu Kundu;Usha Dalal;Uma Handa;Harsh Mohan
Vol. 32 , No. 3 , pp. 246-249
382 views DOI Abstract
2019
Environmental exposure to pesticides and risk of thyroid diseases.
Requena, Mar;López, Antonia;Hernández, Antonio F;Parrón, Tesifón;Navarro, Ángela;Alarcón, Raquel;
380 views DOI Abstract
2014
vitamin d status in adult critically ill patients in eastern india: an observational retrospective study
;Rajesh Padhi;Baikunthanath Panda;Snehalata Jagati;Subhas Chandra Patra
Vol. 31 , No. 3 , pp. 212-216
366 views DOI Abstract
2019
Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS) and Polycarbonate (PC) Filaments Three-Dimensional (3-D) Printer Emissions-Induced Cell Toxicity.
Farcas, Mariana T;Stefaniak, Aleksandr B;Knepp, Alycia K;Bowers, Lauren;Mandler, William K;Kashon, Michael;Jackson, Stephen R;Stueckle, Todd A;Sisler, Jenifer D;Friend, Sherri A;Qi, Chaolong;Hammond, Duane R;Thomas, Treye A;Matheson, Joanna;Castranova, Vincent;Qian, Yong;
354 views DOI Abstract
2011
clinical and laboratory profile of patients with tb/hiv coinfection: a case series of 50 patients
;Anand K Patel;Sandip J Thakrar;Feroz D Ghanchi
Vol. 28 , No. 2 , pp. 93-96
350 views DOI Abstract
View All 83 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.