Vacuum | Journament

Journal Ranking

#128 / 33,855
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 день назад

Vacuum

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Индексации
scopus ulakbim
Краткое название Vacuum
Сокращённое название vacuum
ISSN 0042207X
Цели и охват
URL
Инструкции для авторов
Added by Said Nadeem on Jul 03, 2019

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (133 total)

2019
Ecofriendly synthesis of monodispersed silver nanoparticles using Andean Mortiño berry as reductant and its photocatalytic activity
Kumar B.
Vol. 160 , pp. 272-278
433 views DOI
2013
haloperidol-induced changes in neuronal activity in the striatum of the freely moving rat
;Dorin eYael;Dagmar Helena Zeef;Daniel eSand;Anan eMoran;Donald Brian Katz;Dana eCohen;Yasin eTemel;Izhar eBar-Gad
Vol. 7 , pp. -
402 views DOI Abstract
2019
Role of rapid and slow cooling on leakage mechanism and ferroelectric polarization of sputtered epitaxial BiFeO <inf>3</inf> thin films
Zhu H.
Vol. 163 , pp. 312-316
295 views DOI
2019
Role of rapid and slow cooling on leakage mechanism and ferroelectric polarization of sputtered epitaxial BiFeO <inf>3</inf> thin films
Zhu H.
Vol. 163 , pp. 312-316
293 views DOI
2014
rtms neuromodulation improves electrocortical functional measures of information processing and behavioral responses in autism
;Estate M Sokhadze;Ayman S El-Baz;Lonnie L Sears;Ioan eOpris;Manuel F Casanova
Vol. 8 , pp. -
293 views DOI Abstract
2017
diversity of evoked astrocyte ca2+ dynamics quantified through experimental measurements and mathematical modeling
;Marsa Taheri;Gregory Handy;Alla Borisyuk;John A. White
Vol. 11 , pp. -
290 views DOI Abstract
2012
histamine h3 receptor inverse agonists on cognitive and motor processes: relevance to alzheimer’s disease, adhd, schizophrenia and drug abuse
;Divya eVohora;Malay eBhowmik
Vol. 6 , pp. -
288 views DOI Abstract
2010
connectivity analysis is essential to understand neurological disorders
;James Rowe;James Rowe;James Rowe
Vol. 4 , pp. -
273 views DOI Abstract
2011
minimal impairment in a rat model of duration discrimination following excitotoxic lesions of primary auditory and prefrontal cortices
;Shraddha S Pai;Shraddha S Pai;Jeffrey C Erlich;Jeffrey C Erlich;Charles eKopec;Charles eKopec;Carlos D Brody;Carlos D Brody
Vol. 5 , pp. -
269 views DOI Abstract
2015
improvement of the in vitro recordings in cortical slices by using customized flexible neuroprobes
;Xavi Illa;Xavi Illa;Beatriz Rebollo;Maria V Sanchez-Vives
Vol. 9 , pp. -
267 views DOI Abstract
View All 133 Articles
40
Overall
Below Average
31
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.1/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.