business week | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2407 / 33,958
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 weeks ago

business week

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name business week
Abbreviated Name business week
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (20 total)

2015
law, imperial bureaucracy and russian jews beyond the pale of settlement in 19 – beginning of the 20th centuries
Vol. 37 , No. 3 , pp. 623-632
277 views Abstract
2015
the legal regulation of artisan and trade corporations in the cities of medieval europe
Vol. 36 , No. 2 , pp. 219-228
245 views Abstract
2015
new-york “water buses” – the intrépida and mensajera gunboats
Vol. 36 , No. 2 , pp. 303-308
242 views Abstract
2014
institutionalization of the historic knowledge within asian russia in pre-soviet period
Vol. 33 , No. 3 , pp. 430-436
227 views Abstract
2015
gao mouhan in the history of liao empire and koryo kingdom
Vol. 37 , No. 3 , pp. 465-471
226 views Abstract
2015
the revolutionary movement in the evaluation of f.m. dostoevsky: to understand conservatism in the political history of russia
Vol. 38 , No. 4 , pp. 1069-1077
218 views Abstract
2005
Ajax how to weave a faster Web
, pp. 90
214 views
2014
the first world war: historic memory and educational space (on the materials of russia and netherlands)
Vol. 33 , No. 3 , pp. 361-368
213 views Abstract
2015
the life support system of the siberian village anan'ino in xvii–xviii centuries (archaeological and written sources)
Vol. 37 , No. 3 , pp. 479-490
211 views Abstract
40
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

39.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.