Indexed in Journament

electronic engineering times

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
36.0 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #11,040 of 29,339 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
39 Articles
Scores higher than 62.3% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name electronic engineering times
Abbreviated Name electronic engineering times

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.5
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 5.0
Content Distribution 67.2
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for electronic engineering times
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.1
Accessibility 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity 28.9
Innovation 70.0 31.2
Community Impact 5.0 13.4
Content Distribution 67.2 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (39)

2010
level of patient information on antibiotic use
Vol. 46 , No. 3 , pp. 437-444
451 views DOI Abstract
2018
insulin-loaded polymeric mucoadhesive nanoparticles: development, characterization and cytotoxicity evaluation
Vol. 54 , No. 1 , pp. -
363 views DOI Abstract
2009
vasodilator activity of extracts of field alpinia purpurata (vieill) k: schum and a. zerumbet (pers.) burtt et smith cultured in vitro
Vol. 45 , No. 3 , pp. 507-514
345 views DOI Abstract
medication dispensing as an opportunity for patient counseling and approach to drug-related problems
Vol. 52 , No. 1 , pp. 151-162
343 views DOI Abstract
2015
freeze-drying of ampicillin solid lipid nanoparticles using mannitol as cryoprotectant
Vol. 51 , No. 4 , pp. 797-802
336 views DOI Abstract
2013
in vitro release of diclofenac diethylamine from gels: evaluation of generic semisolid drug products in brazil
Vol. 49 , No. 2 , pp. 211-219
294 views DOI Abstract
2009
standardization of method for determining glycosylated hemoglobin (hb a1c) by cation exchange high performance liquid chromatography
Vol. 45 , No. 4 , pp. 650-657
291 views DOI Abstract
2012
management of effluents and waste from pharmaceutical industry in minas gerais, brazil
Vol. 48 , No. 4 , pp. 727-736
284 views Abstract
2018
4-nerolidylcatechol induces autophagy in human glioblastoma cells
Vol. 53 , No. 3 , pp. -
278 views DOI Abstract
2014
preparation and characterization of microcapsules of pterodon pubescens benth. by using natural polymers
Vol. 50 , No. 4 , pp. 919-930
269 views DOI Abstract
2018
total flavonoids from ampelopsis megalophylla suppress proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells in vivo and in vitro
Vol. 53 , No. 3 , pp. -
198 views DOI Abstract
2018
the radiation protection role of heparin-sod conjugate in irradiated mice
Vol. 53 , No. 4 , pp. -
242 views DOI Abstract
2018
insulin-loaded polymeric mucoadhesive nanoparticles: development, characterization and cytotoxicity evaluation
Vol. 54 , No. 1 , pp. -
363 views DOI Abstract
2018
4-nerolidylcatechol induces autophagy in human glioblastoma cells
Vol. 53 , No. 3 , pp. -
278 views DOI Abstract
2018
cross-cultural adaptation of hypertension knowledge test into european portuguese
Vol. 53 , No. 4 , pp. -
238 views DOI Abstract
2017
identification of neprilysin as a potential target of arteannuin using computational drug repositioning
Vol. 53 , No. 2 , pp. -
158 views DOI Abstract
2015
freeze-drying of ampicillin solid lipid nanoparticles using mannitol as cryoprotectant
Vol. 51 , No. 4 , pp. 797-802
336 views DOI Abstract
2015
synthesis and dpph scavenging assay of reserpine analogues, computational studies and in silico docking studies in ache and bche responsible for alzheimer's disease
Vol. 51 , No. 1 , pp. 53-61
254 views DOI Abstract
2015
in vivo mucoadhesive strength appraisal of gum manilkara zapota
Vol. 51 , No. 3 , pp. 689-698
136 views DOI Abstract
2014
anti-inflammatory, analgesic, and immunostimulatory effects of luehea divaricata mart. & zucc. (malvaceae) bark
Vol. 50 , No. 3 , pp. 599-610
167 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
36.0/100 · Poor
Ranked #11,040 of 29,339 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

36.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

67.2/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.