electronic engineering times | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2265 / 33,954
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

electronic engineering times

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name electronic engineering times
Abbreviated Name electronic engineering times
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (39 total)

2010
level of patient information on antibiotic use
;Fernando de Sá Del Fiol;Silvio Barberato-Filho;Luciane Cruz Lopes;Maria Inês de Toledo
Vol. 46 , No. 3 , pp. 437-444
398 views DOI Abstract
2018
insulin-loaded polymeric mucoadhesive nanoparticles: development, characterization and cytotoxicity evaluation
;Tiago Henrique Honorato Gatti;Josimar Oliveira Eloy;Leonardo Miziara Barboza Ferreira;Isabel Cristine da Silva;Fernando Rogério Pavan;Maria Palmira Daflon Gremião;Marlus Chorilli
Vol. 54 , No. 1 , pp. -
337 views DOI Abstract
2015
freeze-drying of ampicillin solid lipid nanoparticles using mannitol as cryoprotectant
;Faezeh Alihosseini;Solmaz Ghaffari;Ali Reza Dabirsiaghi;Setareh Haghighat
Vol. 51 , No. 4 , pp. 797-802
313 views DOI Abstract
medication dispensing as an opportunity for patient counseling and approach to drug-related problems
;Tatyana Xavier Almeida Matteucci Ferreira;Luciana Resende Prudente;Nathalie de Lourdes Souza Dewulf;Mércia Pandolfo Provin;Patrícia de Carvalho Mastroianni;Erika Aparecida da Silveira;Rita Goreti Amaral
Vol. 52 , No. 1 , pp. 151-162
302 views DOI Abstract
2009
vasodilator activity of extracts of field alpinia purpurata (vieill) k: schum and a. zerumbet (pers.) burtt et smith cultured in vitro
;Cristiane Pimentel Victório;Ricardo Machado Kuster;Roberto Soares de Moura;Celso Luiz Salgueiro Lage
Vol. 45 , No. 3 , pp. 507-514
299 views DOI Abstract
2013
in vitro release of diclofenac diethylamine from gels: evaluation of generic semisolid drug products in brazil
;Karin Goebel;Mayumi Eliza Otsuka Sato;Dayse Fernanda de Souza;Fábio Seigi Murakami;Itamar Francisco Andreazza
Vol. 49 , No. 2 , pp. 211-219
264 views DOI Abstract
2014
preparation and characterization of microcapsules of pterodon pubescens benth. by using natural polymers
;Alexandre Espada Reinas;Jaqueline Hoscheid;Priscila Miyuki Outuki;Mara Lane Carvalho Cardoso
Vol. 50 , No. 4 , pp. 919-930
250 views DOI Abstract
2018
4-nerolidylcatechol induces autophagy in human glioblastoma cells
;Renato Ramos Massaro;Carla Abdo Brohem;Rebeca Leite de Almeida;Diogo Pineda Rivelli;Juliano Andreoli Miyake;Alison Colquhoun;Silvia Berlanga de Moraes Barros;Silvya Stuchi Maria-Engler
Vol. 53 , No. 3 , pp. -
246 views DOI Abstract
2009
standardization of method for determining glycosylated hemoglobin (hb a1c) by cation exchange high performance liquid chromatography
;Marina Venzon Antunes;Sandrine Comparsi Wagner;Joíza Lins Camargo;Rafael Linden
Vol. 45 , No. 4 , pp. 650-657
242 views DOI Abstract
2012
management of effluents and waste from pharmaceutical industry in minas gerais, brazil
;Eleonora Deschamps;Olivia Vasconcelos;Lisete Lange;Claudio Luis Donnici;Merces Coelho da Silva;Juliana Aparecida Sales
Vol. 48 , No. 4 , pp. 727-736
237 views Abstract
View All 39 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.