proc - the fourth ieee workshop on software technol for future embedded and ubiquitous syst, seus 2006 andthe second int workshop on collaborative comput, integr, and assur, wccia 2006 | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1593 / 33,950
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

proc - the fourth ieee workshop on software technol for future embedded and ubiquitous syst, seus 2006 andthe second int workshop on collaborative comput, integr, and assur, wccia 2006

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name proc - the fourth ieee workshop on software technol for future embedded and ubiquitous syst, seus 2006 andthe second int workshop on collaborative comput, integr, and assur, wccia 2006
Abbreviated Name proc - the fourth ieee workshop on software technol for future embedded and ubiquitous syst, seus 2006 andthe second int workshop on collaborative comput, integr, and assur, wccia 2006
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (193 total)

2007
formulação do fungo coniothyrium minitans para controle do mofo-branco causado por sclerotinia sclerotiorum formulation of coniothyrium minitans for biocontrol of white mold caused by sclerotinia sclerotiorum
;Alex Moretini;Itamar Soares de Melo
Vol. 42 , No. 2 , pp. 155-161
350 views DOI Abstract
2009
towards an ecological index for tropical soil quality based on soil macrofauna em busca de um índice ecológico para a qualidade de solo tropical com base na macrofauna edáfica
;Esperanza Huerta;Christian Kampichler;Violette Geissen;Susana Ochoa-Gaona;Ben de Jong;Salvador Hernández-Daumás
Vol. 44 , No. 8 , pp. 1056-1062
323 views DOI Abstract
2004
dinâmica da matéria orgânica e da biomassa microbiana em solo submetido a diferentes sistemas de manejo na amazônia ocidental dynamic of organic matter and microbial biomass in a soil under different management systems in the western amazon
;Adônis Moreira;Eurípedes Malavolta
Vol. 39 , No. 11 , pp. 1103-1110
319 views DOI Abstract
2006
Negotiation mechanisms on application level: A new approach to improve quality of service in web servers
Estrella J.
Vol. 2006 , pp. 255-259
316 views DOI
2013
valor nutricional e energia metabolizável de subprodutos do trigo utilizados para alimentação de suínos em crescimento nutritional value and metabolizable energy of wheat by‑products used for feeding growing pigs
;William Rui Wesendonck;Alexandre de Mello Kessler;Andréa Machado Leal Ribeiro;Marcelo Luiz Somensi;Luciane Bockor;Julio Cezar Dadalt;Alessandra Nardina Trícia Rigo Monteiro;Fábio Ritter Marx
Vol. 48 , No. 2 , pp. 203-210
312 views Abstract
1999
adaptabilidade e estabilidade do rendimento de grãos de genótipos de feijão grain yield adaptation and stability of bean genotypes
;Clause Fátima de Brum Piana;Irajá Ferreira Antunes;João Gilberto Corrêa da Silva;Expedito Paulo Silveira
Vol. 34 , No. 4 , pp. 553-564
304 views DOI Abstract
2009
brazilian maize genotypes sensitivity to water deficit estimated through a simple crop yield model sensibilidade de genótipos brasileiros de milho ao deficit hídrico, estimada por um modelo simples de produtividade
;Kleber Gustavo Andrioli;Paulo Cesar Sentelhas
Vol. 44 , No. 7 , pp. 653-660
302 views DOI Abstract
2007
informações fenotípicas e marcadores microssatélites de qtl na escolha de populações segregantes de feijoeiro choice of common bean segregant populations using phenotypic information and qtl microsatellite markers
;Helton Santos Pereira;João Bosco dos Santos;Ângela de Fátima Barbosa Abreu;Karla Rodrigues Couto
Vol. 42 , No. 5 , pp. 707-713
299 views DOI Abstract
2009
tropical terrestrial model ecosystems for evaluation of soil fauna and leaf litter quality effects on litter consumption, soil microbial biomass and plant growth efeitos de fauna de solo e qualidade de liteira sobre o consumo, biomassa microbiana e crescimento de plantas em modelo de ecossistemas terrestres tropicais
;Bernhard Förster;Marcos Garcia;Hubert Höfer;Edward Morgan;Jörg Römbke
Vol. 44 , No. 8 , pp. 1063-1071
297 views DOI Abstract
2010
the use of insulin to improve fertility of timed-inseminated postpartum suckled beef cows uso de insulina para aumento da fertilidade de vacas de corte pós-parto lactantes inseminadas
;Augusto Schneider;Luiz Francisco Machado Pfeifer;Eduardo Schmitt;Ivan Bianchi;Marcelo Brandi Vieira;Eduardo Gularte Xavier;Francisco Augusto Burkert Del Pino;Marcio Nunes Corrêa
Vol. 45 , No. 10 , pp. 1219-1221
294 views DOI Abstract
View All 193 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.