journal of magnetic resonance (san diego, calif : 1997) | Journament

Journal Ranking

#78 / 33,718
πŸ“Š Below Average
Overall Score
48.5/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
85
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
55
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 months ago

journal of magnetic resonance (san diego, calif : 1997)

Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • βœ… Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • βœ… Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • βœ… No iframe limitations
  • βœ… Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • βœ… Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • βœ… Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name j magn reson
Abbreviated Name j magn reson
ISSN 1096-0856
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (875 total)

2014
human decidual macrophages and nk cells differentially express toll-like receptors and display distinct cytokine profiles upon tlr stimulation.
Vol. 5 , pp. -
494 views DOI Abstract
2019
Probing excited conformational states of nucleic acids by nitrogen CEST NMR spectroscopy.
Vol. 310 , pp. 106642
345 views DOI Abstract
2017
the p-type atpase pa1429 regulates quorum-sensing systems and bacterial virulence
Vol. 8 , pp. -
333 views DOI Abstract
2020
heavy metal toxicity in armed conflicts potentiates amr in a. baumannii by selecting for antibiotic and heavy metal co-resistance mechanisms
Vol. 11 , pp. -
319 views DOI Abstract
2017
a multilocus sequence analysis scheme for phylogeny of thioclava bacteria and proposal of two novel species
Vol. 8 , pp. -
319 views DOI Abstract
2018
the divergence in bacterial components associated with bactrocera dorsalis across developmental stages
Vol. 9 , pp. -
307 views DOI Abstract
2016
evaluation of 16s rrna gene primer pairs for monitoring microbial community structures showed high reproducibility within and low comparability between datasets generated with multiple archaeal and bacterial primer pairs
Vol. 7 , pp. -
306 views DOI Abstract
2019
Nonlinear sampling in ultrafast Laplace NMR.
Vol. 307 , pp. 106571
302 views DOI Abstract
2015
soil microbial community structure is unaltered by plant invasion, vegetation clipping, and nitrogen fertilization in experimental semi-arid grasslands
Vol. 6 , pp. -
301 views DOI Abstract
48
Overall
Below Average
85
15
30
40
55
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

48.5/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

84.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

55.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.