academy of management review | Journament

Journal Ranking

#503 / 33,854
📉 Poor
Overall Score
35.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
75
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
32
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 13 hours ago

academy of management review

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ulakbim soc
Short Name academy of management review
Abbreviated Name academy of management review
ISSN 0363-7425
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (116 total)

2021
Artificial Intelligence and Management: The Automation–Augmentation Paradox
Sebastian Raisch; Sebastian Krakowski
1,417 views DOI
2016
analysis of assistance procedures to normal birth in primiparous
;Joe Luiz Vieira Garcia Novo;Débora Goulart Piantino;Olivia Siquera Filogônio;Neil Ferreira Novo
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 30-35
297 views DOI Abstract
2012
vaginal delivery after one cesarean section
;Bianca Totta Patrício;Natália Sartori Vanin;Joe Luiz Vieira Novo
Vol. 14 , No. 4 , pp. 135-146
279 views Abstract
2019
They want what I’ve got (I think): The causes and consequences of attributing coworker behavior to envy
Puranik H.
Vol. 44 , pp. 424-449
266 views DOI
2010
coronary flow, microvascular obstruction and croembolization after acute coronary thrombosis and oronary reperfusion de alzheimer.
;Emerson de Albuquerque Seixas
Vol. 12 , No. 2 , pp. 4-8
256 views Abstract
2015
prevalence of mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in students of faculdade de ciências médicas e da saúde da puc-sp
;Raquel Aparecida de Oliveira;Raíssa de Campos
Vol. 17 , No. 2 , pp. 73-79
254 views Abstract
2015
the effect of body mass index in lung volumes and diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide
;Ana Raquel Gonçalves de Barros;Gonçalo Simões;Sandra Dias;Nuno Miguel Ferreira Raposo
Vol. 17 , No. 2 , pp. 58-61
244 views Abstract
2017
intestinal obstruction for biliary lithiasis: case report
;Miguel Enrique Rodriguez Rodriguez;Oscar Díaz Pi;Javier Mellado Herrera;Luis Emilio Jurit Rodriguez;Gandy Guasch Figueras
Vol. 19 , No. 2 , pp. 97-99
230 views DOI Abstract
2018
topical analgesia study after deep chemical peeling utilizing water, melaleuca oil and gel mask in comparison of saline solution mask
;Hamilton Aleardo Gonella;Carolina Utsunomiya Muniz;Lorena Caetano Pereira;Fernando Batocchio Quevedo;Luis Felipe Prado Salvador
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 29-32
228 views DOI Abstract
2011
treatment and partial recovery of ischemic stroke hemiplegy through acupuncture
;David Gonçalves Nordon;Viviane Piai
Vol. 13 , No. 2 , pp. 24-27
215 views Abstract
View All 116 Articles
36
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
32
75
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

35.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

32.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

75.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.