journal of wind engineering and industrial aerodynamics | Journament

Journal Ranking

#203 / 33,811
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
33
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 13 hours ago

journal of wind engineering and industrial aerodynamics

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ulakbim sci
Short Name journal of wind engineering and industrial aerodynamics
Abbreviated Name journal of wind engineering and industrial aerodynamics
ISSN 01676105
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions
Added by Said Nadeem on Jul 03, 2019

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (24 total)

2015
the outsourcing of resource management of medical institutions
;Оксана Владимировна ГАЙДАЕНКО;Константин Викторович КОШКИН;Петр Николаевич УДОВИЧЕНКО
Vol. 4 , No. 2(1111) , pp. 35-40
340 views DOI Abstract
2019
Research on non-stationary wind-induced effects and the working mechanism of full scale super-large cooling tower based on field measurement
Wang H.
Vol. 184 , pp. 61-76
320 views DOI
2016
methods of selecting the effective models of buildings reprofiling projects
;Александр Иванович МЕНЕЙЛЮК;Лилия Вячеславовна ЛОБАКОВА
Vol. 5 , No. 1(1173) , pp. 76-81
306 views DOI Abstract
2017
the proactive management model of strategic development project on the energy supply companies in a turbulent environment
;Михайло Збишекович ДОМБРОВСЬКИЙ;Анатолій Олексійович САЧЕНКО
Vol. 7 , No. 2(1224) , pp. 41-45
302 views DOI Abstract
2019
Research on non-stationary wind-induced effects and the working mechanism of full scale super-large cooling tower based on field measurement
Wang H.
Vol. 184 , pp. 61-76
286 views DOI
2017
СИСТЕМНИЙ АНАЛІЗ ПЕРЕДУМОВ ІНІЦІАЦІЇ ПРОЕКТІВ РЕМОНТУ ТА УТРИМАННЯ АВТОМОБІЛЬНИХ ДОРІГ
;Аліна Павлівна ПАРАСОЧКА;Вікторія Олександрівна ХРУТЬБА
Vol. 8 , No. 3(1225) , pp. 70-76
257 views DOI Abstract
2016
information technology of giving definition of the complex index of quality in creating a trip route in the projects of urban passenger transport
;Наталія Василівна ДАВІДІЧ;Дмитрий Миколайович БУГАС;Микола Павлович ПАН;Ігор Володимирович ЧУМАЧЕНКО
Vol. 5 , No. 1(1173) , pp. 19-23
249 views DOI Abstract
2015
ecological and economic efficiency of a portfolio of projects of transport enterprises
;Вікторія Олександрівна ХРУТЬБА;Ганна Олександрівна ВАЙГАНГ;Андрій Сергійович ХРУТЬБА
Vol. 3 , No. 1(1110) , pp. 90-96
239 views DOI Abstract
2015
management of construction time at the restoration of the ostankino tv tower
;Михаил Николаевич ЕРШОВ;Александр Иванович МЕНЕЙЛЮК;Лилия Вячеславовна ЛОБАКОВА
Vol. 4 , No. 2(1111) , pp. 96-101
237 views DOI Abstract
2015
formation of investment portfolio based on utility index and project risks
;Наталья Валентиновна ГАЙДУКОВА
Vol. 2 , No. 3(1046) , pp. 121-126
229 views DOI Abstract
View All 24 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

32.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.