Indexed in Journament

gms journal for medical education

ISSN 2366-5017· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
39.7 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #1,808 of 29,298 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
11 Articles
Scores higher than 93.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name gms j med educ
Abbreviated Name gms journal for medical education
ISSN 2366-5017

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.5
Timeliness 0.0
Diversity 33.3
Innovation 67.5
Community Impact 10.7
Content Distribution 90.5
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.4
Accessibility — 22.5
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 33.3 22.7
Innovation 67.5 24.1
Community Impact 10.7 4.2
Content Distribution 90.5 88.7
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (11)

2019
The Aachen model study course in medicine - development and implementation. Fifteen years of a reformed medical curriculum at RWTH Aachen University.
Simon, Melanie;Martens, Annika;Finsterer, Sonja;Sudmann, Sandra;Arias, Johann;
Vol. 36 , No. 5 , pp. Doc60
413 views DOI Abstract
2019
Experiencing and designing community-based medicine - development and evaluation of an elective based on explorative learning.
Herrmann, Wolfram J;Gehrke-Beck, Sabine;Heintze, Christoph;
Vol. 36 , No. 6 , pp. Doc74
387 views DOI Abstract
2019
Medical lectures upgraded: 11 hacks from comedy.
Unteregger, Fabian;Mayer, Philipp;
Vol. 36 , No. 3 , pp. Doc23
374 views DOI Abstract
2019
Implementation of online peer feedback for student self-reflection - first steps on the development of a feedback culture at a medical faculty.
Raski, Bianca;Eissner, Alexander;Gummersbach, Elisabeth;Wilm, Stefan;Hempel, Linn;Dederichs, Melina;Rotthoff, Thomas;
Vol. 36 , No. 4 , pp. Doc42
372 views DOI Abstract
2019
The frequency of using certain feedback methods in the teaching of medicine: a survey of teachers at the medical faculties in Baden-Wurttemberg.
Kunz, Kevin;Burkert, Mirka;Heindl, Felix;Schüttpelz-Brauns, Katrin;Giesler, Marianne;
Vol. 36 , No. 4 , pp. Doc45
369 views DOI Abstract
2016
Simulating the physician as healthcare manager: An innovative course to train for the manager role.
Gradel, Maximilian;Moder, Stefan;Nicolai, Leo;Pander, Tanja;Hoppe, Boj;Pinilla, Severin;Von der Borch, Philip;Fischer, Martin R;Dimitriadis, Konstantinos;
Vol. 33 , No. 3 , pp. Doc41
362 views DOI Abstract
2016
Importance and benefits of the doctoral thesis for medical graduates
Marianne, Giesler,;Martin, Boeker,;Götz, Fabry,;Silke, Biller,;
Vol. 33 , No. 1 , pp. Doc8-
359 views Abstract
Factors that Affect the National Student Performance Examination Grades of Brazilian Undergraduate Medical Programs.
Neto, Toufic Anbar;da Silva Fucuta Pereia, Patricia;Nogueira, Mauricio L;Pereira de Gody, Jose Maria;Moscardini, Airton C;
Vol. 35 , No. 1 , pp. Doc8
339 views DOI Abstract
2017
10 years of didactic training for novices in medical education at Charité
Ulrike, Sonntag,;Harm, Peters,;P., Schnabel, Kai;Jan, Breckwoldt,;
Vol. 34 , No. 4 , pp. Doc39-
323 views Abstract
2019
The Berlin reformed curriculum in undergraduate medical education: a retrospective of the development history, principles, and termination
Jutta, Begenau,;Claudia, Kiessling,;
Vol. 36 , No. 5 , pp. Doc62-
316 views Abstract
2019
Experiencing and designing community-based medicine - development and evaluation of an elective based on explorative learning.
Herrmann, Wolfram J;Gehrke-Beck, Sabine;Heintze, Christoph;
Vol. 36 , No. 6 , pp. Doc74
387 views DOI Abstract
2019
Assessment methods in medical specialist assessments in the DACH region - overview, critical examination and recommendations for further development.
Thiessen, Nils;Fischer, Martin R;Huwendiek, Sören;
Vol. 36 , No. 6 , pp. Doc78
227 views DOI Abstract
2019
The Aachen model study course in medicine - development and implementation. Fifteen years of a reformed medical curriculum at RWTH Aachen University.
Simon, Melanie;Martens, Annika;Finsterer, Sonja;Sudmann, Sandra;Arias, Johann;
Vol. 36 , No. 5 , pp. Doc60
413 views DOI Abstract
2019
Implementation of online peer feedback for student self-reflection - first steps on the development of a feedback culture at a medical faculty.
Raski, Bianca;Eissner, Alexander;Gummersbach, Elisabeth;Wilm, Stefan;Hempel, Linn;Dederichs, Melina;Rotthoff, Thomas;
Vol. 36 , No. 4 , pp. Doc42
372 views DOI Abstract
2019
The Berlin reformed curriculum in undergraduate medical education: a retrospective of the development history, principles, and termination
Jutta, Begenau,;Claudia, Kiessling,;
Vol. 36 , No. 5 , pp. Doc62-
316 views Abstract
2019
The frequency of using certain feedback methods in the teaching of medicine: a survey of teachers at the medical faculties in Baden-Wurttemberg.
Kunz, Kevin;Burkert, Mirka;Heindl, Felix;Schüttpelz-Brauns, Katrin;Giesler, Marianne;
Vol. 36 , No. 4 , pp. Doc45
369 views DOI Abstract
2019
Medical lectures upgraded: 11 hacks from comedy.
Unteregger, Fabian;Mayer, Philipp;
Vol. 36 , No. 3 , pp. Doc23
374 views DOI Abstract
2017
10 years of didactic training for novices in medical education at Charité
Ulrike, Sonntag,;Harm, Peters,;P., Schnabel, Kai;Jan, Breckwoldt,;
Vol. 34 , No. 4 , pp. Doc39-
323 views Abstract
2016
Simulating the physician as healthcare manager: An innovative course to train for the manager role.
Gradel, Maximilian;Moder, Stefan;Nicolai, Leo;Pander, Tanja;Hoppe, Boj;Pinilla, Severin;Von der Borch, Philip;Fischer, Martin R;Dimitriadis, Konstantinos;
Vol. 33 , No. 3 , pp. Doc41
362 views DOI Abstract
2016
Importance and benefits of the doctoral thesis for medical graduates
Marianne, Giesler,;Martin, Boeker,;Götz, Fabry,;Silke, Biller,;
Vol. 33 , No. 1 , pp. Doc8-
359 views Abstract
Journament Score
39.7/100 · Poor
Ranked #1,808 of 29,298 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

33.3/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

67.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

90.5/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.