15th ibero-american conference on software engineering, cibse 2012 | Journament

Journal Ranking

#7473 / 33,972
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

15th ibero-american conference on software engineering, cibse 2012

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name 15th ibero-american conference on software engineering, cibse 2012
Abbreviated Name 15th ibero-american conference on software engineering, cibse 2012
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (126 total)

2012
results of recombinant growth hormone treatment in children with end-stage renal disease on regular hemodialysis
;Doaa Mohammed Youssef
Vol. 23 , No. 4 , pp. 755-764
381 views DOI Abstract
2008
early non-immunological post transplant complications: a single center experience
;Jabur Wael;Mohammed Saaed Hareth;Abdulla Khalid
Vol. 19 , No. 4 , pp. 651-657
380 views Abstract
2000
ways of treating iga nephropathies
;Wardle E
Vol. 11 , No. 3 , pp. 325-333
380 views Abstract
2012
Usability of mobile web applications: Evaluating a new approach inspection through experimental studies
Bonifácio B.
, pp. 0-0
351 views
2008
association of angiotensin-converting enzyme gene dimorphisms with severity of lupus disease
;Rabbani Malik;Mahmood M;Mekan Sabeen;Frossard Philippe
Vol. 19 , No. 5 , pp. 761-766
340 views Abstract
2008
renal replacement therapy in acute kidney injury: which method to use in the intensive care unit?
;Davenport Andrew
Vol. 19 , No. 4 , pp. 529-536
301 views Abstract
2010
impact of immunosuppression and chemotherapy on reactivation of viral hepatitis
;Fallahian Farahnaz;Alavian Seyed-Moayed;Fallahian Vida;Zamani Farhad
Vol. 21 , No. 4 , pp. 621-627
289 views Abstract
2000
management of lupus nephritis
;Merkel F;Gross O;Weber M
Vol. 11 , No. 3 , pp. 381-395
287 views Abstract
2010
nephrocalcinosis in very low birth weight infants
;Nasseri Fatemeh;Azhir Afshin;Rahmanian Shiva;Iranpour Ramin;Adibi Atoosa
Vol. 21 , No. 2 , pp. 284-289
283 views Abstract
2001
regression of post-transplant <i>kaposi&#x2032;s sarcoma</i> after replacing cyclosporine with mycophenolate mofetil
;Hussein Magdi;Mooij Jacob;Roujouleh Haysam
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 42-44
250 views Abstract
View All 126 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.