Indexed in Journament

15th ibero-american conference on software engineering, cibse 2012

EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
34.1 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #11,053 of 29,298 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
126 Articles
Scores higher than 62.2% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name 15th ibero-american conference on software engineering, cibse 2012
Abbreviated Name 15th ibero-american conference on software engineering, cibse 2012

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.4
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 4.3
Content Distribution 59.0
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.4
Accessibility — 22.5
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity — 22.7
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 4.3 4.2
Content Distribution 59.0 88.7
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (126)

2000
ways of treating iga nephropathies
;Wardle E
Vol. 11 , No. 3 , pp. 325-333
433 views Abstract
2008
early non-immunological post transplant complications: a single center experience
;Jabur Wael;Mohammed Saaed Hareth;Abdulla Khalid
Vol. 19 , No. 4 , pp. 651-657
429 views Abstract
2012
results of recombinant growth hormone treatment in children with end-stage renal disease on regular hemodialysis
;Doaa Mohammed Youssef
Vol. 23 , No. 4 , pp. 755-764
408 views DOI Abstract
2012
Usability of mobile web applications: Evaluating a new approach inspection through experimental studies
Bonifácio B.
, pp. 0-0
388 views
2008
association of angiotensin-converting enzyme gene dimorphisms with severity of lupus disease
;Rabbani Malik;Mahmood M;Mekan Sabeen;Frossard Philippe
Vol. 19 , No. 5 , pp. 761-766
370 views Abstract
2008
renal replacement therapy in acute kidney injury: which method to use in the intensive care unit?
;Davenport Andrew
Vol. 19 , No. 4 , pp. 529-536
341 views Abstract
2000
management of lupus nephritis
;Merkel F;Gross O;Weber M
Vol. 11 , No. 3 , pp. 381-395
330 views Abstract
2010
impact of immunosuppression and chemotherapy on reactivation of viral hepatitis
;Fallahian Farahnaz;Alavian Seyed-Moayed;Fallahian Vida;Zamani Farhad
Vol. 21 , No. 4 , pp. 621-627
310 views Abstract
2010
nephrocalcinosis in very low birth weight infants
;Nasseri Fatemeh;Azhir Afshin;Rahmanian Shiva;Iranpour Ramin;Adibi Atoosa
Vol. 21 , No. 2 , pp. 284-289
303 views Abstract
2000
intermittent oral versus intravenous alfacalcidol in dialysis patients
;Mitwalli Ahmed;Alam Awatif
Vol. 11 , No. 2 , pp. 174-180
284 views Abstract
2018
mutational analysis of agxt gene in libyan children with primary hyperoxaluria type 1 at tripoli children hospital
;Naziha R Rhuma;Omar A Fituri;Laila T Sabei
Vol. 29 , No. 1 , pp. 30-38
211 views DOI Abstract
2017
biopsy of small kidneys: a safe and a useful guide to potentially treatable kidney disease
;Kamel El-Reshaid;Wael El-Reshaid;Dalal Al-Bader;Jozsef Varro;John Madda;Hosameldin Tawfik Sallam
Vol. 28 , No. 2 , pp. 298-306
128 views DOI Abstract
2017
clinical variables differentiating diabetic from nondiabetic kidney disease in patients with diabetes: a single-center study
;Salman Imtiaz;Beena Salman;Kiran Nasir;Murtaza F Drohlia;Aasim Ahmad
Vol. 28 , No. 2 , pp. 307-312
148 views DOI Abstract
2017
carnitine reduced erythropoietin dose required and improved cardiac function of patients on maintenance hemodialysis
;Yosuke Aoki;Takako Yamamoto
Vol. 28 , No. 3 , pp. 477-482
218 views DOI Abstract
2017
an unusual case of insecticide poisoning presenting as acute kidney injury
;Manjusha Yadla;Singiri Sailaja;Nazma Ahmed;Megha Uppin;N Arlappa
Vol. 28 , No. 6 , pp. 1432-1434
132 views DOI Abstract
2017
anatomical study of renal and accessory renal arteries
;Anand A Jamkar;Bashir Khan;Deepak S Joshi
Vol. 28 , No. 2 , pp. 292-297
97 views DOI Abstract
2017
anti-glomerular basement membrane: a rare cause of renal failure in children
;Indira Agarwal;Ahmad Al-Ghitany
Vol. 28 , No. 2 , pp. 379-383
126 views DOI Abstract
2017
pattern and predictors of urine protein excretion among patients with type 2 diabetes attending a single tertiary hospital in lagos, nigeria
;Babawale T Bello;Christiana O Amira
Vol. 28 , No. 6 , pp. 1381-1388
240 views DOI Abstract
2017
neutrophil chemokines levels in different stages of nephrotic syndrome
;Ashwag S Alsharidah;Mohammad A Alzogaibi;Nervana M Bayoumy;Mohammed Alghonaim
Vol. 28 , No. 6 , pp. 1256-1263
216 views DOI Abstract
2017
current state of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in egypt
;Khaled Mohamed Amin Elzorkany
Vol. 28 , No. 6 , pp. 1369-1374
203 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
34.1/100 · Poor
Ranked #11,053 of 29,298 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

34.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

4.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

59.0/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.