Indexed in Journament

15th ibero-american conference on software engineering, cibse 2012

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
37.8/100
Journament Score
#10,169
Journament Rank
126
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name 15th ibero-american conference on software engineering, cibse 2012
Abbreviated Name 15th ibero-american conference on software engineering, cibse 2012

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (126)

2008
early non-immunological post transplant complications: a single center experience
Vol. 19 , No. 4 , pp. 651-657
395 views Abstract
2000
ways of treating iga nephropathies
Vol. 11 , No. 3 , pp. 325-333
394 views Abstract
2012
results of recombinant growth hormone treatment in children with end-stage renal disease on regular hemodialysis
Vol. 23 , No. 4 , pp. 755-764
392 views DOI Abstract
2008
association of angiotensin-converting enzyme gene dimorphisms with severity of lupus disease
Vol. 19 , No. 5 , pp. 761-766
348 views Abstract
2008
renal replacement therapy in acute kidney injury: which method to use in the intensive care unit?
Vol. 19 , No. 4 , pp. 529-536
313 views Abstract
2000
management of lupus nephritis
Vol. 11 , No. 3 , pp. 381-395
304 views Abstract
2010
impact of immunosuppression and chemotherapy on reactivation of viral hepatitis
Vol. 21 , No. 4 , pp. 621-627
295 views Abstract
2010
nephrocalcinosis in very low birth weight infants
Vol. 21 , No. 2 , pp. 284-289
288 views Abstract
2001
regression of post-transplant <i>kaposi&#x2032;s sarcoma</i> after replacing cyclosporine with mycophenolate mofetil
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 42-44
258 views Abstract
2018
mutational analysis of agxt gene in libyan children with primary hyperoxaluria type 1 at tripoli children hospital
Vol. 29 , No. 1 , pp. 30-38
199 views DOI Abstract
2017
biopsy of small kidneys: a safe and a useful guide to potentially treatable kidney disease
Vol. 28 , No. 2 , pp. 298-306
110 views DOI Abstract
2017
clinical variables differentiating diabetic from nondiabetic kidney disease in patients with diabetes: a single-center study
Vol. 28 , No. 2 , pp. 307-312
126 views DOI Abstract
2017
carnitine reduced erythropoietin dose required and improved cardiac function of patients on maintenance hemodialysis
Vol. 28 , No. 3 , pp. 477-482
204 views DOI Abstract
2017
an unusual case of insecticide poisoning presenting as acute kidney injury
Vol. 28 , No. 6 , pp. 1432-1434
115 views DOI Abstract
2017
anatomical study of renal and accessory renal arteries
Vol. 28 , No. 2 , pp. 292-297
78 views DOI Abstract
2017
anti-glomerular basement membrane: a rare cause of renal failure in children
Vol. 28 , No. 2 , pp. 379-383
116 views DOI Abstract
2017
2017
neutrophil chemokines levels in different stages of nephrotic syndrome
Vol. 28 , No. 6 , pp. 1256-1263
195 views DOI Abstract
2017
current state of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in egypt
Vol. 28 , No. 6 , pp. 1369-1374
190 views DOI Abstract
38
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

37.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.