Indexed in Journament

multiple sclerosis (houndmills, basingstoke, england)

ISSN 1477-0970· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
41.3 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #4,138 of 29,330 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
7 Articles
Scores higher than 85.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name mult scler
Abbreviated Name mult scler
ISSN 1477-0970

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for multiple sclerosis (houndmills, basingstoke, england)
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.3 30.3
Accessibility 15.0 18.3
Timeliness 50.0 12.6
Diversity 30.0 27.3
Innovation 40.0 28.9
Community Impact 33.5 9.7
Content Distribution 90.7 88.5
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (7)

2019
Disparities in management and outcomes of myocardial infarction in multiple sclerosis: A matched cohort study.
, pp. 1352458519876038
371 views DOI Abstract
2020
Coexisting systemic and organ-specific autoimmunity in MOG-IgG1-associated disorders versus AQP4-IgG+ NMOSD.
, pp. 1352458520933884
350 views DOI Abstract
2017
Altered intestinal permeability in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: A pilot study.
Vol. 23 , No. 3 , pp. 442-446
334 views DOI Abstract
2020
Genetic and gene expression signatures in multiple sclerosis.
, pp. 1352458519898332
299 views DOI Abstract
2019
Modelling the impact of multiple sclerosis on life expectancy, quality-adjusted life years and total lifetime costs: Evidence from Australia.
, pp. 1352458519831213
298 views DOI Abstract
2019
Change in multiple sclerosis prevalence over time in Australia 2010-2017 utilising disease-modifying therapy prescription data.
, pp. 1352458519861270
263 views DOI Abstract
2004
Waldenström's macroglobulinemia developing in a patient with multiple sclerosis: coincidence or association?
Vol. 10 , No. 5 , pp. 598-600
242 views Abstract
2020
Coexisting systemic and organ-specific autoimmunity in MOG-IgG1-associated disorders versus AQP4-IgG+ NMOSD.
, pp. 1352458520933884
350 views DOI Abstract
2020
Genetic and gene expression signatures in multiple sclerosis.
, pp. 1352458519898332
299 views DOI Abstract
2019
Disparities in management and outcomes of myocardial infarction in multiple sclerosis: A matched cohort study.
, pp. 1352458519876038
371 views DOI Abstract
2019
Modelling the impact of multiple sclerosis on life expectancy, quality-adjusted life years and total lifetime costs: Evidence from Australia.
, pp. 1352458519831213
298 views DOI Abstract
2019
Change in multiple sclerosis prevalence over time in Australia 2010-2017 utilising disease-modifying therapy prescription data.
, pp. 1352458519861270
263 views DOI Abstract
2017
Altered intestinal permeability in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: A pilot study.
Vol. 23 , No. 3 , pp. 442-446
334 views DOI Abstract
2004
Waldenström's macroglobulinemia developing in a patient with multiple sclerosis: coincidence or association?
Vol. 10 , No. 5 , pp. 598-600
242 views Abstract
Journament Score
41.3/100 · Below Average
Ranked #4,138 of 29,330 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

41.3/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

90.7/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.