journal of computational and graphical statistics : a joint publication of american statistical association, institute of mathematical statistics, interface foundation of north america | Journament

Journal Ranking

#770 / 33,953
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.5/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

journal of computational and graphical statistics : a joint publication of american statistical association, institute of mathematical statistics, interface foundation of north america

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name j comput graph stat
Abbreviated Name j comput graph stat
ISSN 1061-8600
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/ucgs20/current
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (100 total)

2011
brazilian guidelines for transcranial doppler in children and adolescents with sickle cell disease
;Clarisse Lopes de Castro Lobo;Rodolfo Delfini Cançado;Ana Claudia Celestino Bezerra Leite;Ana Claudia Mendonça dos Anjos;Ana Cristina Silva Pinto;Andre Palma da Cunha Matta;Célia Maria Silva;Gisele Sampaio Silva;João Ricardo Friedrisch;Josefina Aparecida Pellegrini Braga;Marcos Christiano Lange;Maria Stella Figueiredo;Marília Álvares Rugani;Orlando Veloso;Patrícia Gomes Moura;Paulo Ivo Cortez;Robert Adams;Sandra Fátima Menosi Gualandro;Shirley Lopes de Castilho;Ursula Thomé;Viviane Flumignan Zetola
Vol. 33 , No. 1 , pp. 43-48
468 views DOI Abstract
2013
study of possible clinical and laboratory predictors of alloimmunization against red blood cell antigens in cancer patients
;Carla Luana Dinardo;Glaucia Munemasa Ito;Luciana Ribeiro Sampaio;Alfredo Mendrone Junior
Vol. 35 , No. 6 , pp. 414-416
452 views DOI Abstract
2015
perception of primary care doctors and nurses about care provided to sickle cell disease patients
;Ludmila Mourão Xavier Gomes;Thiago Luis de Andrade Barbosa;Elen Débora Souza Vieira;Antônio Prates Caldeira;Heloísa de Carvalho Torres;Marcos Borato Viana
Vol. 37 , No. 4 , pp. 247-251
451 views DOI Abstract
2014
evaluation of red cell and reticulocyte parameters as indicative of iron deficiency in patients with anemia of chronic disease
;Ana Beatriz Barbosa Torino;Maria de Fátima Pererira Gilberti;Edvilson da Costa;Gisélia Aparecida Freire de Lima;Helena Zerlotti Wolf Grotto
Vol. 36 , No. 6 , pp. 424-429
423 views DOI Abstract
2013
impact of iron overload on interleukin-10 levels, biochemical parameters and oxidative stress in patients with sickle cell anemia
;Maritza Cavalcante Barbosa;Talyta Ellen Jesus dos Santos;Geane Félix de Souza;Lívia Coêlho de Assis;Max Victor Carioca Freitas;Romélia Pinheiro Gonçalves
Vol. 35 , No. 1 , pp. 29-34
399 views DOI Abstract
2011
importance of monitoring and early switch to second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the prognosis of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia with imatinib resistance or intolerance
;Belinda Pinto Simões;José Wilson Ramos Braga Junior;Maria Aparecida do Carmo Rego;Cármino Antônio de Souza
Vol. 33 , No. 1 , pp. 65-72
336 views DOI Abstract
2013
adherence to treatment with imatinib in chronic myeloid leukemia: a study of the first decade of responses obtained at a brazilian hospital
;Samuel Roosevelt Campos dos Reis;Acy Telles de Souza Quixada;Sammara Tavares Nunes;Danielle Maria Camelo Cid;Jacqueline Holanda de Souza;Clara Maria Bastos Eloy da Costa;Carolina Bizelli Silveira;David Antonio Camelo Cid;Mariana Fatima Cabral de Oliveira
Vol. 35 , No. 3 , pp. 174-179
333 views DOI Abstract
2018
Rank Conditional Coverage and Confidence Intervals in High-Dimensional Problems.
Morrison, Jean;Simon, Noah;
Vol. 27 , No. 3 , pp. 648-656
298 views DOI Abstract
2004
o transplante de medula óssea na leucemia mielóide aguda: análise de 80 pacientes transplantados no complexo do hospital das clínicas da faculdade de medicina da universidade de são paulo the allogeneic and autologous bone marrow transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia: analysis of 80 patients - bone marrow transplantation service - hospital das clínicas of the medical school, university of são paulo
;Nadjanara D. Bueno;Rosaura Saboya;Maria Cristina Martins;Roberto L. Silva;Dalton A. F. Chamone;Isamara F. Rocha;Daniel Sturaro;Frederico L. Dulley
Vol. 26 , No. 2 , pp. 84-92
294 views DOI Abstract
2008
prevalência de talassemias e hemoglobinas variantes em pacientes portadores de lúpus eritematoso sistêmico prevalence of thalassemias and variant hemoglobins in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus
;Frank S. Castro;Nilzio A. Silva;Paulo R. Melo-Reis;Karlla G. B. Dias-Penna;Cláudio B. Silva;Natália A. A. Brandão;Rosane M. Cantero;Tatiana D. S. Ferreira;Lee C. Chen
Vol. 30 , No. 1 , pp. 24-28
285 views DOI Abstract
View All 100 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.5/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.