Indexed in Journament

journal of computational and graphical statistics : a joint publication of american statistical association, institute of mathematical statistics, interface foundation of north america

ISSN 1061-8600· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
33.1 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #13,508 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
100 Articles
Scores higher than 53.9% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name j comput graph stat
Abbreviated Name j comput graph stat
ISSN 1061-8600
URL https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/ucgs20/current

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for journal of computational and graphical statistics : a joint publication of american statistical association, institute of mathematical statistics, interface foundation of north america
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 20.4
Timeliness 0.0 5.8
Diversity 33.3 24.4
Innovation 70.0 25.7
Community Impact 2.1 5.8
Content Distribution 66.6 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (100)

2011
brazilian guidelines for transcranial doppler in children and adolescents with sickle cell disease
Vol. 33 , No. 1 , pp. 43-48
527 views DOI Abstract
2013
study of possible clinical and laboratory predictors of alloimmunization against red blood cell antigens in cancer patients
Vol. 35 , No. 6 , pp. 414-416
506 views DOI Abstract
2015
perception of primary care doctors and nurses about care provided to sickle cell disease patients
Vol. 37 , No. 4 , pp. 247-251
502 views DOI Abstract
2014
evaluation of red cell and reticulocyte parameters as indicative of iron deficiency in patients with anemia of chronic disease
Vol. 36 , No. 6 , pp. 424-429
480 views DOI Abstract
2013
impact of iron overload on interleukin-10 levels, biochemical parameters and oxidative stress in patients with sickle cell anemia
Vol. 35 , No. 1 , pp. 29-34
446 views DOI Abstract
2013
adherence to treatment with imatinib in chronic myeloid leukemia: a study of the first decade of responses obtained at a brazilian hospital
Vol. 35 , No. 3 , pp. 174-179
387 views DOI Abstract
2011
importance of monitoring and early switch to second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the prognosis of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia with imatinib resistance or intolerance
Vol. 33 , No. 1 , pp. 65-72
383 views DOI Abstract
2008
prevalência de talassemias e hemoglobinas variantes em pacientes portadores de lúpus eritematoso sistêmico prevalence of thalassemias and variant hemoglobins in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus
Vol. 30 , No. 1 , pp. 24-28
355 views DOI Abstract
2014
iron deficiency anemia among kindergarten children living in the marginalized areas of gaza strip, palestine
Vol. 36 , No. 2 , pp. 132-138
343 views DOI Abstract
2018
Rank Conditional Coverage and Confidence Intervals in High-Dimensional Problems.
Vol. 27 , No. 3 , pp. 648-656
341 views DOI Abstract
2019
Multiresolution Network Models.
Vol. 28 , No. 1 , pp. 185-196
232 views DOI Abstract
2018
Rank Conditional Coverage and Confidence Intervals in High-Dimensional Problems.
Vol. 27 , No. 3 , pp. 648-656
341 views DOI Abstract
2015
evaluation of the effectiveness of packed red blood cell irradiation by a linear accelerator
Vol. 37 , No. 3 , pp. 153-159
196 views DOI Abstract
2015
an unexpected full neurological recovery after cardiac arrest in a sickle cell anemia patient with bilateral cervical carotid artery disease
Vol. 37 , No. 4 , pp. 272-274
211 views DOI
2015
perception of primary care doctors and nurses about care provided to sickle cell disease patients
Vol. 37 , No. 4 , pp. 247-251
502 views DOI Abstract
2014
t-cell/myeloid mixed-phenotype acute leukemia with monocytic differentiation and isolated 17p deletion
Vol. 36 , No. 4 , pp. 293-296
242 views DOI Abstract
2014
iron deficiency anemia among kindergarten children living in the marginalized areas of gaza strip, palestine
Vol. 36 , No. 2 , pp. 132-138
343 views DOI Abstract
2014
evaluation of red cell and reticulocyte parameters as indicative of iron deficiency in patients with anemia of chronic disease
Vol. 36 , No. 6 , pp. 424-429
480 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
33.1/100 · Poor
Ranked #13,508 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

33.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

33.3/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

2.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

66.6/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.