Indexed in Journament

biomedical sciences instrumentation

ISSN 0067-8856· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
34.2 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #11,038 of 29,298 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
68 Articles
Scores higher than 62.3% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name biomed sci instrum
Abbreviated Name biomed sci instrum
ISSN 0067-8856

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.9
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 3.6
Content Distribution 59.0
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for biomedical sciences instrumentation
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.9 30.4
Accessibility 22.5
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 22.7
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 3.6 4.2
Content Distribution 59.0 88.7
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (68)

2015
2018
antimicrobial efficacy of octenidine hydrochloride and calcium hydroxide with and without a carrier: a broth dilution analysis
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 72-76
514 views DOI Abstract
2012
stress distribution among periodontally compromised abutments: a comparative study using three-dimensional finite element analysis
Vol. 3 , No. 4 , pp. 452-458
473 views DOI Abstract
2015
decalcifying capability of irrigating solutions on root canal dentin mineral content
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 201-205
454 views DOI Abstract
2016
2010
remineralization of early enamel lesions using casein phosphopeptide amorphous calcium phosphate: an ex-vivo study
Vol. 1 , No. 4 , pp. 210-213
387 views DOI Abstract
2017
assessment of bracket surface morphology and dimensional change
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 71-80
377 views DOI Abstract
2014
odontogenic infections: microbiology and management
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. 307-311
375 views DOI Abstract
2015
gorlin–goltz syndrome: a case series of 5 patients in north indian population with comparative analysis of literature
Vol. 6 , No. 6 , pp. 192-201
359 views DOI Abstract
2018
antimicrobial efficacy of octenidine hydrochloride and calcium hydroxide with and without a carrier: a broth dilution analysis
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 72-76
514 views DOI Abstract
2018
non-hodgkin's lymphoma of the mandible in hiv patient - a rare case report
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 110-113
281 views DOI Abstract
2017
surgical management of large radicular cyst associated with mandibular deciduous molar using platelet-rich fibrin augmentation: a rare case report
Vol. 8 , No. 4 , pp. 647-649
274 views DOI Abstract
2017
the bond strength of nanohybrid and nanoceramic composites to feldspathic porcelain
Vol. 8 , No. 4 , pp. 558-564
312 views DOI Abstract
2017
interleukin 1β (+3954; −511) genotype polymorphism and its association with severe chronic generalized periodontitis in the malaysian population
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 102-105
216 views DOI Abstract
2017
taking a glance at anterior crossbite in children: case series
Vol. 8 , No. 4 , pp. 679-682
194 views DOI Abstract
2017
antiplaque efficacy of tooth and gums tonic, hiora-ga gel, and spirogyl gum paint in comparison with chlorhexidine m gel: a double-blind randomized control trial
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 42-47
238 views DOI Abstract
2017
comparative evaluation of platelet-rich fibrin with connective tissue grafts in the treatment of miller's class i gingival recessions
Vol. 8 , No. 4 , pp. 531-537
324 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
34.2/100 · Poor
Ranked #11,038 of 29,298 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

34.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

3.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

59.0/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.