biomedical sciences instrumentation | Journament

Journal Ranking

#4956 / 33,958
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 4 weeks ago

biomedical sciences instrumentation

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name biomed sci instrum
Abbreviated Name biomed sci instrum
ISSN 0067-8856
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (68 total)

2015
estimation of changes in c-reactive protein level and pregnancy outcome after nonsurgical supportive periodontal therapy in women affected with periodontitis in a rural set up of india
;Mayur S Khairnar;Babita R Pawar;Pramod P Marawar;Darshana M Khairnar
Vol. 6 , No. 5 , pp. 5-11
503 views DOI Abstract
2018
antimicrobial efficacy of octenidine hydrochloride and calcium hydroxide with and without a carrier: a broth dilution analysis
;Vinaya Susan Varghese;Veerendra Uppin;Kishore Bhat;Madhu Pujar;Amruta B Hooli;Nirmal Kurian
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 72-76
481 views DOI Abstract
2012
stress distribution among periodontally compromised abutments: a comparative study using three-dimensional finite element analysis
;Rajkiran Chitumalla;Swapna Munaga;Amit Khare;Surendra Agarwal;Anjali Bhoyar;Swapnil Parlani
Vol. 3 , No. 4 , pp. 452-458
447 views DOI Abstract
2015
decalcifying capability of irrigating solutions on root canal dentin mineral content
;Claudio Poggio;Alberto Dagna;Andrea Vinci;Riccardo Beltrami;Lucia Cucca;Luciano Giardino
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 201-205
413 views DOI Abstract
2010
remineralization of early enamel lesions using casein phosphopeptide amorphous calcium phosphate: an ex-vivo study
;Ruchi Vashisht;Anil Kumar;R Indira;M R Srinivasan;S Ramachandran
Vol. 1 , No. 4 , pp. 210-213
354 views DOI Abstract
2017
assessment of bracket surface morphology and dimensional change
;Pillai Devu Radhakrishnan;N K Sapna Varma;V V Ajith
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 71-80
344 views DOI Abstract
2014
odontogenic infections: microbiology and management
;Rashi Bahl;Sumeet Sandhu;Kanwardeep Singh;Nilanchal Sahai;Mohita Gupta
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. 307-311
339 views DOI Abstract
2016
comparative evaluation of co-enzyme q10 and melaleuca alternifolia as antioxidant gels in treatment of chronic periodontitis: a clinical study
;Chetan Purushottam Raut;Kunal S Sethi
Vol. 7 , No. 3 , pp. 377-381
337 views DOI Abstract
2013
the effect of sub-antimicrobial dose-doxycycline periodontal therapy on serum inflammatory biomarker c-reactive protein levels in post-menopausal women: a 2-year, double-blinded, randomized clinical trial
;Rajesh S Koppikar;Sneh V Agrawal
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 71-73
334 views DOI Abstract
2015
gorlin–goltz syndrome: a case series of 5 patients in north indian population with comparative analysis of literature
;Jeevan Lata;Nitin Verma;Amandeep Kaur
Vol. 6 , No. 6 , pp. 192-201
331 views DOI Abstract
View All 68 Articles
37
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.