Indexed in Journament

biology of reproduction

ISSN 1529-7268· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
38.9 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #3,374 of 29,298 scored journals (34,018 indexed)
174 Articles
Scores higher than 88.4% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name biol reprod
Abbreviated Name biology of reproduction
ISSN 1529-7268

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.7
Timeliness 100.0
Diversity 11.1
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 7.1
Content Distribution 18.7
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for biology of reproduction
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.7 30.5
Accessibility — 23.1
Timeliness 100.0 3.0
Diversity 11.1 25.9
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 7.1 5.7
Content Distribution 18.7 89.4
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (174)

1976
Sexual differentiation and feedback control of luteinizing hormone secretion in the rhesus monkey
Vol. 15 , No. 2 , pp. -
415 views Abstract
2003
Reduced Intrafollicular Androstenedione and Estradiol Levels in Early-Treated Prenatally Androgenized Female Rhesus Monkeys Receiving Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Therapy for In Vitro Fertilization
Vol. 69 , No. 4 , pp. 1213-1219
392 views Abstract
2008
Endocrine antecedents of polycystic ovary syndrome in fetal and infant prenatally androgenized female rhesus monkeys
Vol. 79 , No. 1 , pp. -
384 views Abstract
2019
Microelectrode array analysis of mouse uterine smooth muscle electrical activity.
359 views DOI Abstract
2019
IMMUNODETECTION AND QUANTIFICATION OF ENZYMATIC MARKERS IN THECA CELLS: THE EARLY PROCESS OF OVARIAN STEROIDOGENESIS.
303 views DOI Abstract
2015
1981
2026
CCDC191 localizes to the sperm head-tail coupling apparatus and is essential for spermiogenesis and male fertility in mice
DOI Abstract
2026
Directed conversion of porcine expanded pluripotent stem cells into trophoblast stem cells
DOI Abstract
2026
Developmental short photoperiod exposure impairs sperm motility in Brandt's voles via antioxidant enzyme-mediated ROS dysregulation
3 views DOI Abstract
2026
Connecting primate spermatogonial development with stem cell function
3 views DOI Abstract
2026
In Vitro Fertilization in the Age of In Vitro Gametogenesis
5 views DOI Abstract
2026
Meiosis and Ageing in Mammals
7 views DOI Abstract
2026
Understanding Stallion Sperm Capacitation: Species-Specific Mechanisms, Cryocapacitation, and Implications for IVF
5 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
38.9/100 · Poor
Ranked #3,374 of 29,298 scored
(34,018 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

38.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

11.1/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

100.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

18.7/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.