india international conference on information processing, iicip 2016 - proceedings | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2385 / 33,939
📉 Poor
Overall Score
36.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

india international conference on information processing, iicip 2016 - proceedings

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name india international conference on information processing, iicip 2016 - proceedings
Abbreviated Name india international conference on information processing, iicip 2016 - proceedings
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (98 total)

2009
tumores glômicos subungueais: achados de imagem subungual glomus tumors: imaging findings
;Cristiano Montandon;Juliana da Cunha Costa;Lorena Andrade Dias;Fernando Henrique Abrão Alves da Costa;Ana Carolina Mendes da Costa;Renato Tavares Daher;Marcelo Eustáquio Montandon Jr
Vol. 42 , No. 6 , pp. 371-374
404 views DOI Abstract
2005
avaliação prospectiva do índice de líquido amniótico em gestações normais e complicadas prospective evaluation of amniotic fluid index in normal and high risk pregnancies
;Fabrício da Silva Costa;Sérgio Pereira da Cunha;Aderson Tadeu Berezowski
Vol. 38 , No. 5 , pp. 337-341
401 views DOI Abstract
2015
computed tomography findings of paracoccidiodomycosis in musculoskeletal system
;Francisco Valtenor Araújo Lima Júnior;Leonor Garbin Savarese;Lucas Moretti Monsignore;Roberto Martinez;Marcello Henrique Nogueira-Barbosa
Vol. 48 , No. 1 , pp. 1-6
381 views DOI Abstract
2009
alcoolização percutânea de cistos renais: revisão da literatura e apresentação de resultados percutaneous ethanol sclerotherapy of renal cysts: treatment outcomes and literature review
;Giuseppe D'Ippolito;Lucas Rios Torres;Alessandra Caivano Rodrigues Ribeiro;Arcílio de Jesus Roque;Valdemar Ortiz;Sergio Ajzen
Vol. 42 , No. 4 , pp. 225-230
365 views DOI Abstract
2004
avaliação pré e pós-operatória da tetralogia de fallot por ressonância magnética magnetic resonance imaging pre- and postoperative evaluation of tetralogy of fallot
;Renata Junqueira Moll Bernardes;Edson Marchiori;Paulo Manuel de Barros Bernardes;Maria Beatriz Albano Monzo Gonzaga;Luiz Carlos Simões
Vol. 37 , No. 4 , pp. 251-260
358 views DOI Abstract
2010
redução de incertezas em radioterapia utilizando simulação monte carlo: análise espectral aplicada à correção de dose absorvida reduction of uncertainties in radiotherapy assessed by monte carlo simulation: spectral analysis applied to absorbed dose correction
;Tatiana Marques;Mirko Alva-Sánchez;Patrícia Nicolucci
Vol. 43 , No. 2 , pp. 119-123
347 views DOI Abstract
2013
positive predictive values of breast imaging reporting and data system (bi-rads®) categories 3, 4 and 5 in breast lesions submitted to percutaneous biopsy
;Gustavo Machado Badan;Decio Roveda Junior;Carlos Alberto Pecci Ferreira;Felipe Augusto Trocoli Ferreira;Eduardo de Faria Castro Fleury;Mario Sergio Dantas do Amaral Campos;Rodrigo de Oliveira Seleti;Helio da Cruz Junior
Vol. 46 , No. 4 , pp. 209-213
341 views DOI Abstract
2004
braquiterapia de alta taxa de dose no tratamento do câncer do colo uterino: resultados de controle local, sobrevida e complicações
;Salim Aisen;Wladimir Nadalin
Vol. 37 , No. 2 , pp. 100-100
327 views DOI
2007
reprodutibilidade da classificação ultra-sonográfica de niamey na avaliação da fibrose periportal na esquistossomose mansônica reproducibility of ultrasonography in the assessment of periportal fibrosis according to niamey criteria in patients with schistosomiasis mansoni
;Germana Titonelli Santos;Danilo Moulin Sales;Alberto Ribeiro de Souza Leão;José Eduardo Mourão Santos;Luciane Aparecida Kopke de Aguiar;Paulo Eugênio Brant;David Carlos Shigueoka;Ramiro Colleoni Neto;Giuseppe D'Ippolito
Vol. 40 , No. 6 , pp. 377-381
319 views DOI Abstract
2012
valor da pet/ct na abordagem do câncer de cabeça e pescoço
;Otávio Alberto Curioni;Ricardo Pires de Souza;Ali Amar;Débora Viana;Abrão Rapoport;Rogério Aparecido Dedivitis;Claudio Roberto Cernea;Lenine Garcia Brandão
Vol. 45 , No. 6 , pp. 315-318
310 views DOI Abstract
View All 98 Articles
36
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

36.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.