2017 international conference on information technology systems and innovation, icitsi 2017 - proceedings | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1942 / 33,950
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
39
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

2017 international conference on information technology systems and innovation, icitsi 2017 - proceedings

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name 2017 international conference on information technology systems and innovation, icitsi 2017 - proceedings
Abbreviated Name 2017 international conference on information technology systems and innovation, icitsi 2017 - proceedings
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (103 total)

2012
fatores associados à sobrevida em pacientes submetidos a transplante cardíaco utilizando microcardioplegia sanguínea retrógrada associated factors with survivals in patients undergoing orthotopic heart transplant using retrograde blood microcardioplegia
Vol. 27 , No. 3 , pp. 347-354
555 views DOI Abstract
2008
correção intracardíaca da tetralogia de fallot no primeiro ano de vida: resultados a curto e médio prazos intracardiac correction of tetralogy of fallot in the first year of life: short-term and midium-term results
Vol. 23 , No. 2 , pp. 216-223
437 views DOI Abstract
2010
2006
aneurismectomia de ventrículo esquerdo com o coração batendo ininterruptamente: resultados imediatos left ventricular aneurysmectomy with continuous beating heart: early results
Vol. 21 , No. 1 , pp. 55-61
351 views DOI Abstract
2010
euroscore e mortalidade em cirurgia de revascularização miocárdica no pronto socorro cardiológico de pernambuco euroscore and mortality in coronary artery bypass graft surgery at pernambuco cardiologic emergency medical services [pronto socorro cardiológico de pernambuco]
Vol. 25 , No. 4 , pp. 474-482
345 views DOI Abstract
echocardiographically measured epicardial fat predicts new-onset atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery
Vol. 35 , No. 3 , pp. 339-345
343 views DOI Abstract
2012
cirurgia de revascularização miocárdica na fase aguda do infarto: análise dos fatores preditores de mortalidade intra-hospitalar coronary artery bypass grafting in acute myocardial infarction: analysis of predictors of in-hospital mortality
Vol. 27 , No. 1 , pp. 66-74
327 views DOI Abstract
1998
origem anômala pulmonar da artéria coronária esquerda com trajeto intramural aórtico: diagnóstico e tratamento cirúrgico
Vol. 13 , No. 2 , pp. 120-
313 views DOI Abstract
2011
prevalência de infecções em suturas de cirurgias de revascularização do miocárdio prevalence of infections in surgical sutures on myocardial revascularization surgery
Vol. 26 , No. 1 , pp. 43-46
304 views DOI Abstract
2009
desenvolvimento e avaliação da esterilidade de sistema de diálise peritoneal pediátrico fechado development and assessment of sterility of a closed-system pediatric peritoneal dialysis
Vol. 24 , No. 1 , pp. 64-67
291 views DOI Abstract
38
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
39
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

38.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

38.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.