Indexed in Journament

introducing innodb cluster: learning the mysql high availability stack

EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
28.1 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #26,250 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
137 Articles
Scores higher than 10.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Nom Abrégé introducing innodb cluster: learning the mysql high availability stack
Nom Abrégé introducing innodb cluster: learning the mysql high availability stack

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.8
Timeliness 0.0
Diversity 0.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 3.6
Content Distribution 60.8
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.8 30.1
Accessibility — 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity 0.0 28.8
Innovation 70.0 31.2
Community Impact 3.6 13.4
Content Distribution 60.8 88.4
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (137)

2010
assimetria na relação escavação/disco óptico em adolescentes cup-to-disc ratio asymmetry in adolescents
;Maria Elizabete Jimenes de Campos;Denny Marcos Garcia;Maria de Lourdes Veronese Rodrigues
Vol. 73 , No. 3 , pp. 231-234
682 views DOI Abstract
2005
método citológico e histopatológico no diagnóstico das lesões da conjuntiva: estudo comparativo cytologic and histologic methods in the diagnosis of conjunctival lesions: comparative study
;Carlos Gustavo de Melo G. Lima;João Carlos Bezerra Veloso;Ana Daniele Tavares;Patrícia Jungman;André Araújo de Vasconcelos
Vol. 68 , No. 5 , pp. 623-626
508 views DOI Abstract
2014
comparative study of visual functions in premature pre-school children with and without retinopathy of prematurity
;Lígia Beatriz Bonotto;Ana Tereza Ramos Moreira;Silvia Chuffi;Susana Maria Bittencourt Sckudlarek
Vol. 77 , No. 1 , pp. 34-39
496 views DOI Abstract
2008
textos padronizados em português (br) para medida da velocidade de leitura: comparação com quatro idiomas europeus new standardized texts in brazilian portuguese to assess reading speed: comparison with four european languages
;André Messias;Antonio Augusto Velasco e Cruz;Sonia Jecov Schallenmüller;Susanne Trauzettel-Klosinski
Vol. 71 , No. 4 , pp. 553-558
495 views DOI Abstract
2005
primeiro censo brasileiro em cirurgia refrativa first brazilian refractive surgery survey
;Gustavo Victor;Andreia Urbano;Sônia Marçal;Ricardo Porto;Claudia Maria Francesconi;Adriana dos Santos Forseto;Breno Barth;Milton Ruiz Alves;Walton Nosé
Vol. 68 , No. 6 , pp. 727-733
473 views DOI Abstract
2009
erros de refração como causas de baixa visual em crianças da rede de escolas públicas da regional de botucatu - sp refractive errors as causes of visual impairment in children from public schools of the botucatu region - sp
;Claudia Akemi Shiratori de Oliveira;Kenia Scrocaro Hisatomi;Cristiano Pinheiro Leite;Silvana Artioli Schellini;Carlos Roberto Padovani;Carlos Roberto Pereira Padovani
Vol. 72 , No. 2 , pp. 194-198
455 views DOI Abstract
2007
estudo da síndrome de tração macular vítreo-retiniana idiopática por meio da tomografia de coerência óptica: relato de casos a study of idiophatic vitreomacular traction syndrome with optical coherence tomography images: cases report
;Hélio Paulo Primiano Júnior;Aloísio Fumio Nakashima;Otacílio Oliveira Maia Júnior;Maria Teresa Brizzi Bonanomi;Yoshitaka Nakashima
Vol. 70 , No. 1 , pp. 143-147
446 views DOI Abstract
2008
resultados preliminares de um sistema computadorizado e estereoscópico para pupilometria in vivo preliminary results of a computerized and stereoscopic system for in vivo pupillometry
;Luis Alberto Vieira de Carvalho;Augusto Paranhos Júnior
Vol. 71 , No. 6 , pp. 775-780
410 views DOI Abstract
2007
assessment of visual health campaign activities at schools: teachers' perception avaliação de atividades de campanha de saúde ocular na escola: percepção de professores
;Regina de Souza Carvalho;Edméa Rita Temporini;Newton Kara-José
Vol. 70 , No. 2 , pp. 239-245
405 views DOI Abstract
2009
intravitreal ranibizumab and bevacizumab for the treatment of nonsubfoveal choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration ranibizumab e bevacizumab intravítreo no tratamento da neovascularização de coróide extrafoveal da degeneração macular relacionada à idade
;Aaron Brock Roller;Miguel Hage Amaro
Vol. 72 , No. 5 , pp. 677-681
400 views DOI Abstract
2018
Introducing InnoDB Cluster: Learning the MySQL high availability stack
Bell C.
, pp. 1-465
233 views DOI
2016
initial experience with ocriplasmin in the treatment of vitreomacular traction
;José Maurício Botto de Barros Garcia;David Leonardo Cruvinel Isaac;Marcos Ávila
Vol. 79 , No. 2 , pp. 85-87
156 views DOI Abstract
2016
evaluation of a simulation tool in ophthalmology: application in teaching funduscopy
;Eduardo Damasceno;Nadyr Damasceno
Vol. 79 , No. 2 , pp. 131-131
137 views DOI
2016
descriptive analysis of the type and design of contact lenses fitted according to keratoconus severity and morphology
;Letícia Helena Lunardi;Danielle Arroyo;Marcelo Vicente de Andrade Sobrinho;César Lipener;Juliana Maria da Silva Rosa
Vol. 79 , No. 2 , pp. 82-84
245 views DOI Abstract
2016
bacteriological profile in conjunctival, lacrimal sac, and nasal specimens and conjunctival normalization time following external, endoscopic, and transcanalicular multidiode laser dacryocystorhinostomy
;Melike Balikoglu-Yilmaz;Ayse Banu Esen;Tolga Yilmaz;Umit Taskin;Muhittin Taskapili;M. Faruk Oktay;Emine Sen;Timur Kose
Vol. 79 , No. 3 , pp. 163-170
268 views DOI Abstract
2015
preoperative automatic visual behavioural analysis as a tool for intraocular lens choice in cataract surgery
;Heloisa Neumann Nogueira;Mônica Alves;Paulo Schor
Vol. 78 , No. 2 , pp. 94-99
188 views DOI Abstract
2015
oculo-peritoneal shunt: draining aqueous humor to the peritoneum
;Ana Maldonado-Junyent;Arturo Maldonado-Bas;Andrea Gonzalez;Francisco Pueyrredón;María Maldonado-Junyent;Arturo Maldonado-Junyent;Diego Rodriguez;Mariano Bulacio
Vol. 78 , No. 2 , pp. 123-125
192 views DOI Abstract
2015
publish (negative results too) or perish
;Eduardo Melani Rocha;Mario Luiz Ribeiro Monteiro
Vol. 78 , No. 2 , pp. V-VI
20 views DOI
2015
preoperative tranilast as adjunctive therapy to primary pterygium surgery with a 1-year follow-up
;Gildásio C. Almeida Junior;Luciano Arakawa;Dalísio de Santi Neto;Patrícia Maluf Cury;Acácio A. S. Lima Filho;Sidney J. F. Sousa;Milton R. Alves;Reinaldo Azoubel
Vol. 78 , No. 1 , pp. 1-5
155 views DOI Abstract
2015
an uncommon ocular manifestation of sweet syndrome: peripheral ulcerative keratitis and nodular scleritis
;Ahmet Burak Bilgin;Pınar Tavas;Elif Betul Turkoglu;Hatice Deniz Ilhan;Serap Toru;Kadri Cemil Apaydin
Vol. 78 , No. 1 , pp. 53-55
180 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
28.1/100 · Poor
Ranked #26,250 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

28.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

0.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

3.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

60.8/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.