introducing innodb cluster: learning the mysql high availability stack | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2803 / 33,952
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

introducing innodb cluster: learning the mysql high availability stack

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name introducing innodb cluster: learning the mysql high availability stack
Abbreviated Name introducing innodb cluster: learning the mysql high availability stack
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (137 total)

2010
assimetria na relação escavação/disco óptico em adolescentes cup-to-disc ratio asymmetry in adolescents
;Maria Elizabete Jimenes de Campos;Denny Marcos Garcia;Maria de Lourdes Veronese Rodrigues
Vol. 73 , No. 3 , pp. 231-234
642 views DOI Abstract
2014
comparative study of visual functions in premature pre-school children with and without retinopathy of prematurity
;Lígia Beatriz Bonotto;Ana Tereza Ramos Moreira;Silvia Chuffi;Susana Maria Bittencourt Sckudlarek
Vol. 77 , No. 1 , pp. 34-39
461 views DOI Abstract
2005
método citológico e histopatológico no diagnóstico das lesões da conjuntiva: estudo comparativo cytologic and histologic methods in the diagnosis of conjunctival lesions: comparative study
;Carlos Gustavo de Melo G. Lima;João Carlos Bezerra Veloso;Ana Daniele Tavares;Patrícia Jungman;André Araújo de Vasconcelos
Vol. 68 , No. 5 , pp. 623-626
457 views DOI Abstract
2005
primeiro censo brasileiro em cirurgia refrativa first brazilian refractive surgery survey
;Gustavo Victor;Andreia Urbano;Sônia Marçal;Ricardo Porto;Claudia Maria Francesconi;Adriana dos Santos Forseto;Breno Barth;Milton Ruiz Alves;Walton Nosé
Vol. 68 , No. 6 , pp. 727-733
433 views DOI Abstract
2008
textos padronizados em português (br) para medida da velocidade de leitura: comparação com quatro idiomas europeus new standardized texts in brazilian portuguese to assess reading speed: comparison with four european languages
;André Messias;Antonio Augusto Velasco e Cruz;Sonia Jecov Schallenmüller;Susanne Trauzettel-Klosinski
Vol. 71 , No. 4 , pp. 553-558
429 views DOI Abstract
2007
estudo da síndrome de tração macular vítreo-retiniana idiopática por meio da tomografia de coerência óptica: relato de casos a study of idiophatic vitreomacular traction syndrome with optical coherence tomography images: cases report
;Hélio Paulo Primiano Júnior;Aloísio Fumio Nakashima;Otacílio Oliveira Maia Júnior;Maria Teresa Brizzi Bonanomi;Yoshitaka Nakashima
Vol. 70 , No. 1 , pp. 143-147
399 views DOI Abstract
2009
erros de refração como causas de baixa visual em crianças da rede de escolas públicas da regional de botucatu - sp refractive errors as causes of visual impairment in children from public schools of the botucatu region - sp
;Claudia Akemi Shiratori de Oliveira;Kenia Scrocaro Hisatomi;Cristiano Pinheiro Leite;Silvana Artioli Schellini;Carlos Roberto Padovani;Carlos Roberto Pereira Padovani
Vol. 72 , No. 2 , pp. 194-198
398 views DOI Abstract
2009
intravitreal ranibizumab and bevacizumab for the treatment of nonsubfoveal choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration ranibizumab e bevacizumab intravítreo no tratamento da neovascularização de coróide extrafoveal da degeneração macular relacionada à idade
;Aaron Brock Roller;Miguel Hage Amaro
Vol. 72 , No. 5 , pp. 677-681
360 views DOI Abstract
2010
ability of corneal biomechanical metrics and anterior segment data in the differentiation of keratoconus and healthy corneas estudo da performance diagnóstica de parâmetros biomecânicos e dados anatômicos da câmara anterior na diferenciação de córneas saudáveis e com ceratocone
;Bruno Machado Fontes;Renato Ambrósio Junior;Daniela Jardim;Guillermo Coca Velarde;Walton Nosé
Vol. 73 , No. 4 , pp. 333-337
353 views DOI Abstract
2006
avaliação das alterações fundoscópicas na miopia degenerativa fundus changes evaluation in degenerative myopia
;Oswaldo Ferreira Moura Brasil;Maria Vitoria Oliveira Moura Brasil;Ricardo Miguel Japiassú;Ana Luiza Biancardi;Débora Duarte de Souza;Renato Corrêa de Souza Oliveira;Haroldo Vieira de Moraes Jr.
Vol. 69 , No. 2 , pp. 203-206
347 views DOI Abstract
View All 137 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.