Indexed in Journament

introducing innodb cluster: learning the mysql high availability stack

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
38.0/100
Journament Score
#10,871
Journament Rank
137
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name introducing innodb cluster: learning the mysql high availability stack
Abbreviated Name introducing innodb cluster: learning the mysql high availability stack

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (137)

2010
assimetria na relação escavação/disco óptico em adolescentes cup-to-disc ratio asymmetry in adolescents
Vol. 73 , No. 3 , pp. 231-234
671 views DOI Abstract
2005
método citológico e histopatológico no diagnóstico das lesões da conjuntiva: estudo comparativo cytologic and histologic methods in the diagnosis of conjunctival lesions: comparative study
Vol. 68 , No. 5 , pp. 623-626
493 views DOI Abstract
2014
comparative study of visual functions in premature pre-school children with and without retinopathy of prematurity
Vol. 77 , No. 1 , pp. 34-39
483 views DOI Abstract
2008
textos padronizados em português (br) para medida da velocidade de leitura: comparação com quatro idiomas europeus new standardized texts in brazilian portuguese to assess reading speed: comparison with four european languages
Vol. 71 , No. 4 , pp. 553-558
483 views DOI Abstract
2005
primeiro censo brasileiro em cirurgia refrativa first brazilian refractive surgery survey
Vol. 68 , No. 6 , pp. 727-733
465 views DOI Abstract
2009
erros de refração como causas de baixa visual em crianças da rede de escolas públicas da regional de botucatu - sp refractive errors as causes of visual impairment in children from public schools of the botucatu region - sp
Vol. 72 , No. 2 , pp. 194-198
441 views DOI Abstract
2007
estudo da síndrome de tração macular vítreo-retiniana idiopática por meio da tomografia de coerência óptica: relato de casos a study of idiophatic vitreomacular traction syndrome with optical coherence tomography images: cases report
Vol. 70 , No. 1 , pp. 143-147
433 views DOI Abstract
2007
assessment of visual health campaign activities at schools: teachers' perception avaliação de atividades de campanha de saúde ocular na escola: percepção de professores
Vol. 70 , No. 2 , pp. 239-245
391 views DOI Abstract
2016
initial experience with ocriplasmin in the treatment of vitreomacular traction
Vol. 79 , No. 2 , pp. 85-87
149 views DOI Abstract
2016
evaluation of a simulation tool in ophthalmology: application in teaching funduscopy
Vol. 79 , No. 2 , pp. 131-131
126 views DOI
2016
descriptive analysis of the type and design of contact lenses fitted according to keratoconus severity and morphology
Vol. 79 , No. 2 , pp. 82-84
233 views DOI Abstract
2016
bacteriological profile in conjunctival, lacrimal sac, and nasal specimens and conjunctival normalization time following external, endoscopic, and transcanalicular multidiode laser dacryocystorhinostomy
Vol. 79 , No. 3 , pp. 163-170
260 views DOI Abstract
2015
preoperative automatic visual behavioural analysis as a tool for intraocular lens choice in cataract surgery
Vol. 78 , No. 2 , pp. 94-99
178 views DOI Abstract
2015
oculo-peritoneal shunt: draining aqueous humor to the peritoneum
Vol. 78 , No. 2 , pp. 123-125
182 views DOI Abstract
2015
publish (negative results too) or perish
Vol. 78 , No. 2 , pp. V-VI
12 views DOI
2015
preoperative tranilast as adjunctive therapy to primary pterygium surgery with a 1-year follow-up
Vol. 78 , No. 1 , pp. 1-5
145 views DOI Abstract
2015
an uncommon ocular manifestation of sweet syndrome: peripheral ulcerative keratitis and nodular scleritis
Vol. 78 , No. 1 , pp. 53-55
164 views DOI Abstract
38
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

38.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.