Indexed in Journament

BMC medical informatics and decision making

ISSN 1472-6947· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
40.5/100
Journament Score
#8,165
Journament Rank
65
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name BMC Med Inform Decis Mak
Abbreviated Name bmc med inform decis mak
ISSN 1472-6947
URL https://bmcmedinformdecismak.biomedcentral.com

Indexings

scopus ncbi doaj ulakbim sci

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (65)

2017
Leveraging machine learning-based approaches to assess human papillomavirus vaccination sentiment trends with Twitter data
Vol. 17 , No. S2 , pp. 63-70
564 views Abstract
2019
Promoting healthy teenage behaviour across three European countries through the use of a novel smartphone technology platform, PEGASO fit for future: study protocol of a quasi-experimental, controlled, multi-Centre trial.
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 278
517 views DOI Abstract
2016
prevalence of gingivitis and perception of gingival colour among pregnant women attending the antenatal clinic of lagos university teaching hospital, idi-araba
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 53-58
488 views DOI Abstract
2017
The effect of nursing participation in the design of a critical care information system: a case study in a Chinese hospital
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 1-12
443 views Abstract
2012
liquid dish washing soap: an excellent substitute for xylene and alcohol in hematoxylin and eosin staining procedure
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 37-42
426 views DOI Abstract
2019
What do healthcare professionals need to turn risk models for type 2 diabetes into usable computerized clinical decision support systems? Lessons learned from the MOSAIC project.
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 163
419 views DOI Abstract
2021
Determining the effect of tele-rehabilitation on patients with stutter using the goal attainment scaling (GAS).
Vol. 21 , No. 1 , pp. 280
218 views DOI Abstract
2020
Towards developing a secure medical image sharing system based on zero trust principles and blockchain technology.
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 256
305 views DOI Abstract
2020
Exploring emerging IoT technologies in smart health research: a knowledge graph analysis.
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 260
285 views DOI Abstract
2020
The design and development of technology platforms in a developing country healthcare context from an ecosystem perspective.
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 55
229 views DOI Abstract
2020
Assessing stroke severity using electronic health record data: a machine learning approach.
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 8
298 views DOI Abstract
2019
Promoting healthy teenage behaviour across three European countries through the use of a novel smartphone technology platform, PEGASO fit for future: study protocol of a quasi-experimental, controlled, multi-Centre trial.
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 278
517 views DOI Abstract
2019
Automated detection of altered mental status in emergency department clinical notes: a deep learning approach.
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 164
302 views DOI Abstract
2019
Family history information extraction via deep joint learning.
Vol. 19 , No. Suppl 10 , pp. 277
192 views DOI Abstract
40
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

40.5/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.