journal of biosciences | Journament

Journal Ranking

#439 / 33,930
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
33
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 days ago

journal of biosciences

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ulakbim
Short Name j biosci
Abbreviated Name j biosci
ISSN 0973-7138
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.ias.ac.in/jbiosci/index.html
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (27 total)

2019
Carbohydrates and polyphenolics of extracts from genetically altered plant acts as catalysts for in vitro synthesis of silver nanoparticle
Kumar A.
Vol. 44 , pp. 0-0
442 views DOI
2020
Long non-coding RNA H19 promotes osteogenic differentiation of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells by regulating microRNA-140-5p/SATB2 axis
Bi, H.
Vol. 45 , pp. 0-0
303 views DOI
2014
a clinical perspective on the role of chronic inflammation in gastrointestinal cancer
;Rasch S;Algül H
Vol. 2014 , No. default , pp. 261-272
303 views Abstract
2016
rectal budesonide and mesalamine formulations in active ulcerative proctosigmoiditis: efficacy, tolerance, and treatment approach
;Christophi GP;Rengarajan A;Ciorba MA
Vol. 2016 , No. Issue 1 , pp. 125-130
299 views Abstract
2019
Genetic relatedness and its causal role in the evolution of insect societies.
Pernu, Tuomas K;Helantera, Heikki;
Vol. 44 , No. 4
292 views DOI Abstract
2019
MusatransSSRDB (a transcriptome derived SSR database) - An advanced tool for banana improvement.
Backiyarani, Suthanthiram;Chandrasekar, Arumugam;Uma, Subbaraya;Saraswathi, Marimuthu Somasundaram;
Vol. 44 , No. 1
284 views DOI Abstract
2018
endoscopic comparison of gastroduodenal injury with over-the-counter doses of new fast-dissolving ibuprofen and paracetamol formulations: a randomized, placebo-controlled, 4-way crossover clinical trial
;Lanza FL;Collaku A;Liu DJ
Vol. Volume 11 , pp. 169-177
281 views Abstract
2011
molecular and cellular pathways associated with chromosome 1p deletions during colon carcinogenesis
;Payne CM;Crowley-Skillicorn C;Bernstein C;Holubec H;Bernstein H
Vol. 2011 , No. default , pp. 75-119
268 views Abstract
2019
Correction to: Protein-rich extract of Musca domestica larvae alleviated metabolic disorder in STZ-induced type 2 diabetic rat model via hepatoprotective and pancreatic β-cell protective activities (Journal of Biosciences, (2018), 43, 5, (969-983), 10.1007/s12038-018-9804-z)
Mei, H.
Vol. 44 , pp. 0-0
250 views DOI
2017
exercise in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases: current perspectives
;Engels M;Cross RK;Long MD
Vol. Volume 11 , pp. 1-11
233 views Abstract
View All 27 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.8/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.