animal models and experimental medicine | Journament

Journal Ranking

#938 / 33,930
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 days ago

animal models and experimental medicine

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus
Short Name animal model exp med
Abbreviated Name animal model exp med
ISSN 2576-2095
Aim and Scope
URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/25762095
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (36 total)

2018
LasDB: A collective database for laboratory animal strain resources.
Kong, Qi;Qin, Chuan;
Vol. 1 , No. 4 , pp. 266-271
367 views DOI Abstract
2012
valores comparados de excreciÓn fraccional de magnesio y fÓsforo peritoneal y urinario entre pacientes en diÁlisis peritoneal con diuresis residual, insuficiencia renal crÓnica (estadio iii) y voluntarios sanos
;Musso CG;Rodriguez Macias E;Medina A;Heredia A ;Juarez R;Rivera H;de Miguel R
Vol. 3 , No. 3 , pp. 22-26
281 views Abstract
2005
encainide reduces heart rate variability fractal dimension among arrhythmic patients who suffered acute myocardial infarct
;Luis García Domínguez;Carlos Martínez Ortiz;Miguel Sautié Castellanos;Kiria Valdés Crespo1;Eduardo Tejera;José Luis Hernández Cáceres
Vol. 2005 , No. 1 , pp. 46-49
216 views Abstract
2016
small vesicles, big vehicles: exosomes.
;Saiz-Lopez P;Alcaraz R;García-Toro E
Vol. 3 , No. 3 , pp. 41-48
210 views Abstract
2012
pes planus (flatfoot) in male and female adults of bayelsa- nigeria
;Dare NW;Onyije FM;Osoma S
Vol. 3 , No. 3 , pp. 17-21
207 views Abstract
2006
oral administration of bacillus oligonitrophilus ku-1 may prevent side effects of conventional anticancer treatment
;Maxim V. Trushin;Boris I. Barabanschikov;Gleb Y. Polozov;Sergey V. Malkov;Vladimir V. Markelov
Vol. 2006 , No. 2 , pp. 105-107
199 views
2003
vascular dementia type binswanger's disease in patients with active neurocysticercosis.
;Foyaca Sibat H, MD.;Ibañez Valdés LdeF, MD.
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 32-42
198 views Abstract
2004
medicina, ciencia y medicina basada en la evidencia.
;Ramon Díaz-Alersi, MD.
Vol. 2004 , No. 2 , pp. 36-45
193 views
2009
oxcarbazepine induced hyponatremia: a potential explanation of its physiopathology
;Musso CG;Vilas M;Aparicio C;Bevione P;Reynaldi J;Rojas J;Jauregui R;Algranati L
Vol. 2009 , No. 1 , pp. 32-35
187 views Abstract
2016
lesiones estromales y trofoblÁsticas en vellosidades placentarias de gestantes con sÍndrome antifosfolÍpido en terapia antitrombÓtica.
;Pereira L;Páez A;Tovar O;Ramírez M;Pérez-Ybarra L
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 11-22
182 views Abstract
View All 36 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
30
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.