Indexed in Journament

jmir medical informatics

ISSN 2291-9694· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
31.1 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #17,724 of 29,324 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
54 Articles
Scores higher than 39.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name jmir med inform
Abbreviated Name jmir med inform
ISSN 2291-9694
URL https://medinform.jmir.org

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for jmir medical informatics
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.7 30.4
Accessibility 35.0 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 5.6 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 9.3 7.8
Content Distribution 64.4 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (54)

2019
An Assessment of the Interoperability of Electronic Health Record Exchanges Among Hospitals and Clinics in Taiwan.
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. e12630
442 views DOI Abstract
2019
Primary Care Physicians' Experience Using Advanced Electronic Medical Record Features to Support Chronic Disease Prevention and Management: Qualitative Study.
Vol. 7 , No. 4 , pp. e13318
424 views DOI Abstract
2019
Fine-Tuning Bidirectional Encoder Representations From Transformers (BERT)-Based Models on Large-Scale Electronic Health Record Notes: An Empirical Study.
Vol. 7 , No. 3 , pp. e14830
420 views DOI Abstract
2012
csr-issues in the value chains of multi national companies (mncs) – challenges and best practise
Vol. XII , No. 4 , pp. 155-168
406 views Abstract
2018
Using Blockchain Technology to Manage Clinical Trials Data: A Proof-of-Concept Study.
Vol. 6 , No. 4 , pp. e11949
401 views DOI Abstract
2019
Measuring Regional Quality of Health Care Using Unsolicited Online Data: Text Analysis Study.
Vol. 7 , No. 4 , pp. e13053
389 views DOI Abstract
2019
A Good Practice-Compliant Clinical Trial Imaging Management System for Multicenter Clinical Trials: Development and Validation Study.
Vol. 7 , No. 3 , pp. e14310
385 views DOI Abstract
2019
Assessing the Availability of Data on Social and Behavioral Determinants in Structured and Unstructured Electronic Health Records: A Retrospective Analysis of a Multilevel Health Care System.
Vol. 7 , No. 3 , pp. e13802
383 views DOI Abstract
2020
Enabling External Inquiries to an Existing Patient Registry by Using the Open Source Registry System for Rare Diseases: Demonstration of the System Using the European Society for Immunodeficiencies Registry.
Vol. 8 , No. 10 , pp. e17420
248 views DOI Abstract
2020
Applying Blockchain Technology to Address the Crisis of Trust During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Vol. 8 , No. 9 , pp. e20477
300 views DOI Abstract
2020
Generating Medical Assessments Using a Neural Network Model: Algorithm Development and Validation.
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. e14971
246 views DOI Abstract
2019
Building a Semantic Health Data Warehouse in the Context of Clinical Trials: Development and Usability Study.
Vol. 7 , No. 4 , pp. e13917
285 views DOI Abstract
2019
Characterizing Artificial Intelligence Applications in Cancer Research: A Latent Dirichlet Allocation Analysis.
Vol. 7 , No. 4 , pp. e14401
352 views DOI Abstract
2019
Measuring Regional Quality of Health Care Using Unsolicited Online Data: Text Analysis Study.
Vol. 7 , No. 4 , pp. e13053
389 views DOI Abstract
2019
Electronic Consultation in Primary Care Between Providers and Patients: Systematic Review.
Vol. 7 , No. 4 , pp. e13042
364 views DOI Abstract
2019
Primary Care Physicians' Experience Using Advanced Electronic Medical Record Features to Support Chronic Disease Prevention and Management: Qualitative Study.
Vol. 7 , No. 4 , pp. e13318
424 views DOI Abstract
2019
Using a Large Margin Context-Aware Convolutional Neural Network to Automatically Extract Disease-Disease Association from Literature: Comparative Analytic Study.
Vol. 7 , No. 4 , pp. e14502
334 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
31.1/100 · Poor
Ranked #17,724 of 29,324 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

31.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

9.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

64.4/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.