Indexed in Journament

Database : the journal of biological databases and curation

ISSN 1758-0463· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
36.6 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #3,798 of 29,298 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
66 Articles
Scores higher than 87% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Database (Oxford)
Abbreviated Name database (oxford)
ISSN 1758-0463
URL https://academic.oup.com/database

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.5
Accessibility 20.0
Timeliness 20.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 7.1
Content Distribution 65.4
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 22.5
Timeliness 20.0 3.0
Diversity — 22.7
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 7.1 4.2
Content Distribution 65.4 88.7
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (66)

2009
análise de percepções e ações de cuidados bucais realizados por equipes de enfermagem em unidades de tratamento intensivo perceptions and actions of oral care performed by nursing teams in intensive care units
;Rodolfo José Gomes de Araújo;Layla Cristine Gomes de Oliveira;Leila Maués Oliveira Hanna;Adriano Maia Corrêa;Liliane Helena Vilar Carvalho;Nair Carolina Ferreira Alvares
Vol. 21 , No. 1 , pp. 38-44
539 views DOI Abstract
2008
transfusion-related acute lung injury em pós-operatório de neurocirurgia: relato de caso transfusion-related acute lung injury after following neurosurgery: case report
;Salomón Soriano Ordinola Rojas;Viviane Cordeiro Veiga;Júlio César de Carvalho;Luis Enrique Amaya Campodonico;Ligia Maria Junqueira Silva;José Arimatéia Mendonça;Feres Eduardo Chaddad;Evandro de Oliveira
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 103-105
538 views DOI Abstract
fatores potencialmente associados à decisão de admissão à unidade de terapia intensiva em um país em desenvolvimento: um levantamento de médicos brasileiros
;João Gabriel Rosa Ramos;Rogerio da Hora Passos;Paulo Benigno Pena Baptista;Daniel Neves Forte
Vol. 29 , No. 2 , pp. 154-162
460 views DOI Abstract
2019
AmyloWiki: an integrated database for Bacillus velezensis FZB42, the model strain for plant growth-promoting Bacilli.
Fan, Ben;Wang, Cong;Ding, Xiaolei;Zhu, Bingyao;Song, Xiaofeng;Borriss, Rainer;
Vol. 2019
424 views DOI Abstract
2010
efeitos da manobra de hiperinsuflação manual associada à pressão positiva expiratória final em pacientes submetidos à cirurgia de revascularização miocárdica effects of manual hyperinflation maneuver associated with positive end expiratory pressure in patients within coronary artery bypass grafting
;Laura Jurema dos Santos;Clarissa Netto Blattner;César Augusto Bini Micol;Fernanda Abreu Miceli Pinto;Andressa Renon;Renata Pletsch
Vol. 22 , No. 1 , pp. 40-46
409 views DOI Abstract
2011
infecção por saccharomyces cerevisae: uma infecção atípica em uti saccharomyces cerevisiae infection: an unusual pathogen in the icu
;Felipe Henriques Alves da Silva;Fernando Ribeiro Paço;Eduardo Reis;Vinicius Amaral
Vol. 23 , No. 1 , pp. 108-111
407 views DOI Abstract
2019
Building deep learning models for evidence classification from the open access biomedical literature.
Burns, Gully A;Li, Xiangci;Peng, Nanyun;
Vol. 2019
367 views DOI Abstract
2007
desmame da ventilação mecânica: promova uma estratégia weaning from mechanical ventilation: let's perform a strategy
;Rosane S. Goldwasser;Cid Marcos David
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 107-112
346 views DOI Abstract
2020
Variation benchmark datasets: update, criteria, quality and applications.
Sarkar, Anasua;Yang, Yang;Vihinen, Mauno;
Vol. 2020
343 views DOI Abstract
2018
SAGE: a comprehensive resource of genetic variants integrating South Asian whole genomes and exomes.
Hariprakash, Judith Mary;Vellarikkal, Shamsudheen Karuthedath;Verma, Ankit;Ranawat, Anop Singh;Jayarajan, Rijith;Ravi, Rowmika;Kumar, Anoop;Dixit, Vishal;Sivadas, Ambily;Kashyap, Atul Kumar;Senthivel, Vigneshwar;Sehgal, Paras;Mahadevan, Vijayalakshmi;Scaria, Vinod;Sivasubbu, Sridhar;
Vol. 2018 , pp. 1-10
342 views DOI Abstract
2023
SalivaDB-a comprehensive database for salivary biomarkers in humans.
Arora, Akanksha;Kaur, Dashleen;Patiyal, Sumeet;Kaur, Dilraj;Tomer, Ritu;Raghava, Gajendra P S;
Vol. 2023
125 views DOI Abstract
2020
NCBI Taxonomy: a comprehensive update on curation, resources and tools
Schoch CL;Ciufo S;Domrachev M;Hotton CL;Kannan S;Khovanskaya R;Leipe D;Mcveigh R;O'Neill K;Robbertse B;Sharma S;Soussov V;Sullivan JP;Sun L;Turner S;Karsch-Mizrachi I;;
Vol. 2020 , pp. -
254 views Abstract
2020
PyDISH: database and analysis tools for heme porphyrin distortion in heme proteins.
Kondo, Hiroko X;Kanematsu, Yusuke;Masumoto, Gen;Takano, Yu;
324 views DOI Abstract
2020
Integrating image caption information into biomedical document classification in support of biocuration.
Jiang, Xiangying;Li, Pengyuan;Kadin, James;Blake, Judith A;Ringwald, Martin;Shatkay, Hagit;
Vol. 2020
43 views DOI Abstract
2020
Bio-AnswerFinder: a system to find answers to questions from biomedical texts.
Ozyurt, Ibrahim Burak;Bandrowski, Anita;Grethe, Jeffrey S;
Vol. 2020
320 views DOI Abstract
2020
Variation benchmark datasets: update, criteria, quality and applications.
Sarkar, Anasua;Yang, Yang;Vihinen, Mauno;
Vol. 2020
343 views DOI Abstract
2019
A late-binding, distributed, NoSQL warehouse for integrating patient data from clinical trials.
Yang, Eric;Scheff, Jeremy D;Shen, Shih C;Farnum, Michael A;Sefton, James;Lobanov, Victor S;Agrafiotis, Dimitris K;
Vol. 2019
310 views DOI Abstract
2019
Plant Regulomics Portal (PRP): a comprehensive integrated regulatory information and analysis portal for plant genomes.
Panzade, Ganesh;Gangwar, Indu;Awasthi, Supriya;Sharma, Nitesh;Shankar, Ravi;
Vol. 2019
275 views DOI Abstract
2019
The extraction of complex relationships and their conversion to biological expression language (BEL) overview of the BioCreative VI (2017) BEL track.
Madan, Sumit;Szostak, Justyna;Komandur Elayavilli, Ravikumar;Tsai, Richard Tzong-Han;Ali, Mehdi;Qian, Longhua;Rastegar-Mojarad, Majid;Hoeng, Julia;Fluck, Juliane;
Vol. 2019
279 views DOI Abstract
2019
Building deep learning models for evidence classification from the open access biomedical literature.
Burns, Gully A;Li, Xiangci;Peng, Nanyun;
Vol. 2019
367 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
36.6/100 · Poor
Ranked #3,798 of 29,298 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

36.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

65.4/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.