Вестник Донского государственного технического университета | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3508 / 33,952
📉 Poor
Overall Score
34.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

Вестник Донского государственного технического университета

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name Вестник Донского государственного технического университета
Abbreviated Name Вестник Донского государственного технического университета
ISSN 0000-0000
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (83 total)

2012
body and dress in the civilisation of spectacles
;Florica Iuhaş
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 666-671
451 views Abstract
2018
Architecture and implementation of online testing to check solutions to Olympiad programming problems
Shagilova, E. V.;
Vol. 18 , No. 2 , pp. 214-222
352 views Abstract
2018
Design model of thrust bearing with porous coating on the way surface
Mukutadze, Murman A.;Garmonina, Anastasia N.;Prikhodko, Victor M.;
Vol. 17 , No. 3 , pp. 70-77
342 views Abstract
2012
performances and deficiencies of the regulation of the phenomenon of family violence in the republic of moldova
;Diana Ionita
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 57-63
300 views Abstract
2011
the bensberg mediation model
;Raluca - Marilena Mihalcioiu
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 86-89
283 views Abstract
2009
the impact of development methods (formal / nonformal) above the process of continuous formation of human resources ~ research about the human resources framed in educational services ~
;Claudia Mihaela NICOLAU
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 674-681
278 views Abstract
2011
communicational virtuality of alterity (otherness) in the new media
;Aurel Codoban
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 614-620
267 views Abstract
2012
exchange of information on traffic violations affecting the road safety in the european union
;Minodora-Ioana Balan-Rusu
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 17-21
266 views Abstract
2015
judicial individualization of punishment in special situations. judge's role in these cases
;Cosmin Peneoașu
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 778-786
246 views Abstract
2011
premises of sustainable development on rural communities
;Anca Turtureanu;Cornelia Tureac;Bogdan Andronic;Alexandra Ivan;Alin Filip
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 318-326
240 views Abstract
View All 83 Articles
34
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

34.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.