Indexed in Journament

Вестник Донского государственного технического университета

ISSN 0000-0000· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
28.4 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #26,107 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
83 Articles
Scores higher than 11% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Вестник Донского государственного технического университета
Abbreviated Name Вестник Донского государственного технического университета
ISSN 0000-0000

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.6
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 9.3
Content Distribution 27.3
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Вестник Донского государственного технического университета
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.1
Accessibility 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity 28.8
Innovation 70.0 31.2
Community Impact 9.3 13.4
Content Distribution 27.3 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (83)

2012
body and dress in the civilisation of spectacles
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 666-671
503 views Abstract
2018
2018
Design model of thrust bearing with porous coating on the way surface
Vol. 17 , No. 3 , pp. 70-77
375 views Abstract
2011
communicational virtuality of alterity (otherness) in the new media
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 614-620
337 views Abstract
2011
the bensberg mediation model
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 86-89
328 views Abstract
2012
exchange of information on traffic violations affecting the road safety in the european union
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 17-21
304 views Abstract
2015
judicial individualization of punishment in special situations. judge's role in these cases
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 778-786
290 views Abstract
2011
premises of sustainable development on rural communities
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 318-326
289 views Abstract
2018
the break of seals in the new romanian criminal code
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 444-452
25 views Abstract
2018
Design model of thrust bearing with porous coating on the way surface
Vol. 17 , No. 3 , pp. 70-77
375 views Abstract
2018
2017
g.e.o. 13: the abuse in the line of duty - between legality and formality
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 458-468
83 views Abstract
2016
citizens' rights and freedoms in the european union
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 165-172
87 views Abstract
2016
how crowdfunding works in romania?
Vol. 11 , No. 1` , pp. 311-316
128 views Abstract
2016
factors influencing new business formation
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 348-355
25 views Abstract
2016
premises of the religious cultural tourism development in the galati – braila urban perimeter
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 210-216
135 views Abstract
2016
demographic challenge - economic and social aspects in romania
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 235-248
106 views Abstract
Journament Score
28.4/100 · Poor
Ranked #26,107 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

28.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

9.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

27.3/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.