iberian conference on information systems and technologies, cisti | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1916 / 33,939
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
39
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

iberian conference on information systems and technologies, cisti

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus
Short Name iberian conference on information systems and technologies, cisti
Abbreviated Name iberian conference on information systems and technologies, cisti
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (587 total)

mortality related to tuberculosis-hiv/aids co-infection in brazil, 2000-2011: epidemiological patterns and time trends
;Mauricélia da Silveira Lima;Francisco Rogerlândio Martins-Melo;Jorg Heukelbach;Carlos Henrique Alencar;Reagan Nzundu Boigny;Alberto Novaes Ramos Júnior
Vol. 32 , No. 10 , pp. -
534 views DOI Abstract
2017
impacto orçamentário da incorporação do genexpert mtb/rif para o diagnóstico da tuberculose pulmonar na perspectiva do sistema Único de saúde, brasil, 2013-2017
;Márcia Ferreira Teixeira Pinto;Ricardo Steffen;Aline Entringer;Ana Carolina Carioca da Costa;Anete Trajman
Vol. 33 , No. 9 , pp. -
457 views DOI Abstract
2017
la percepción del colectivo médico sobre la gestión del proceso de desvinculación
;Pilar Monreal-Bosch;Santiago Perera;Maite Martínez González;Clara Selva
Vol. 33 , No. 8 , pp. -
411 views DOI Abstract
2002
padrão de mortalidade por câncer em trabalhadores eletricitários a cancer mortality pattern in brazilian electrical workers
;Inês E. Mattos;Naim Sauaia;Paulo R. Menezes
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 221-233
411 views DOI Abstract
2015
brief introductory guide to agent-based modeling and an illustration from urban health research
;Amy H. Auchincloss;Leandro Martin Totaro Garcia
Vol. 31 , No. suppl 1 , pp. 65-78
363 views DOI Abstract
2009
utilização da modelagem inteiramente bayesiana na detecção de padrões de variação de risco relativo de mortalidade infantil no rio grande do sul, brasil utilization of fully bayesian modeling to detect patterns in relative risk variation for infant mortality in rio grande do sul state, brazil
;Sérgio Kakuta Kato;Diego de Matos Vieira;Jandyra Maria Guimarães Fachel
Vol. 25 , No. 7 , pp. 1501-1510
355 views DOI Abstract
2019
Data quality problems identified in the bioclimatic data collection process - A survey
Barbosa, W.
Vol. 2019-June , pp. 0-0
353 views DOI
2018
“a gente tem acesso de favores, né?”. a percepção de pessoas em situação de rua sobre os direitos humanos à água e ao esgotamento sanitário
;Priscila Neves-Silva;Giselle Isabele Martins;Léo Heller
Vol. 34 , No. 3 , pp. -
350 views DOI Abstract
2018
Comparative analysis of the laravel and codeigniter frameworks: For the implementation of the management system of merit and opposition competitions in the State University Península de Santa Elena
Valarezo R.
Vol. 2018-June , pp. 1-6
349 views DOI
2000
crisis económica y mortalidad infantil en latinoamérica desde los años ochenta economic crisis and infant mortality in latin america since 1980
;Dalia E. Romero;Célia Landmann Szwarcwald
Vol. 16 , No. 3 , pp. 799-814
341 views DOI Abstract
View All 587 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
39
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

39.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.