Indexed in Journament

Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society

ISSN 1876-4452· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
39.1/100
Journament Score
#11,446
Journament Rank
18
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name Sci Justice
Abbreviated Name sci justice
ISSN 1876-4452

Indexings

ncbi

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (18)

2016
Discussion on how to implement a verbal scale in a forensic laboratory: Benefits, pitfalls and suggestions to avoid misunderstandings.
Marquis, Raymond;Biedermann, Alex;Cadola, Liv;Champod, Christophe;Gueissaz, Line;Massonnet, Geneviève;Mazzella, Williams David;Taroni, Franco;Hicks, Tacha;
Vol. 56 , No. 5 , pp. 364-370
499 views DOI Abstract
2018
Avoiding overstating the strength of forensic evidence: Shrunk likelihood ratios/Bayes factors.
Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart;Poh, Norman;
Vol. 58 , No. 3 , pp. 200-218
452 views DOI Abstract
2016
Special issue on measuring and reporting the precision of forensic likelihood ratios: Introduction to the debate.
Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart;
Vol. 56 , No. 5 , pp. 371-373
423 views DOI Abstract
2016
A demonstration of the application of the new paradigm for the evaluation of forensic evidence under conditions reflecting those of a real forensic-voice-comparison case.
Enzinger, Ewald;Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart;Ochoa, Felipe;
Vol. 56 , No. 1 , pp. 42-57
416 views DOI Abstract
2019
Management of crime scene units by Quebec police senior managers: Insight on forensic knowledge and understanding of key stakeholders.
Mousseau, Vincent;Baechler, Simon;Crispino, Frank;
Vol. 59 , No. 5 , pp. 524-532
390 views DOI Abstract
2019
Scientific integrity in the forensic sciences: Consumerism, conflicts of interest, and transparency.
Passalacqua, Nicholas V;Pilloud, Marin A;Belcher, William R;
Vol. 59 , No. 5 , pp. 573-579
381 views DOI Abstract
2019
The repeatability and reproducibility of the Sheffield Features of Gait Tool.
Birch, Ivan;Birch, Maria;Rutler, Lucy;Brown, Sarah;Burgos, Libertad Rodriguez;Otten, Bert;Wiedemeijer, Mickey;
Vol. 59 , No. 5 , pp. 544-551
369 views DOI Abstract
2015
Terminology and forensic gait analysis.
Birch, Ivan;Vernon, Wesley;Walker, Jeremy;Young, Maria;
Vol. 55 , No. 4 , pp. 279-84
348 views DOI Abstract
2019
A risk-based approach to cognitive bias in forensic science.
Camilleri, Andrew;Abarno, Damien;Bird, Carolyne;Coxon, Anne;Mitchell, Natasha;Redman, Kahlee;Sly, Nicol;Wills, Stephen;Silenieks, Edmund;Simpson, Ellie;Lindsay, Heather;
Vol. 59 , No. 5 , pp. 533-543
342 views DOI Abstract
2019
Investigating the effect photodegradation has on natural fibres at a microscopic level.
DeBattista, Roslyn;Tidy, Helen;Clark, Matthew;
Vol. 59 , No. 5 , pp. 498-502
311 views DOI Abstract
2020
Sampling of explosive residues: The use of a gelatine-based medium for the recovery of ammonium nitrate.
Amaral, M A;Yasin, S;Gibson, A P;Morgan, R M;
Vol. 60 , No. 6 , pp. 531-537
64 views DOI Abstract
2019
A Bayesian approach based on Kalman filter frameworks for bullet identification.
Hesar, H Danandeh;Bigdeli, S;Moghaddam, M Ebrahimi;
Vol. 59 , No. 4 , pp. 390-404
189 views DOI Abstract
2019
Assessment of the Yfiler® Plus PCR amplification kit for the detection of male DNA in semen-negative sexual assault cases.
Henry, Julianne;Scandrett, Lenara;
Vol. 59 , No. 5 , pp. 480-485
257 views DOI Abstract
2019
Evaluation of the one-step Lumicyano™ used in the visualisation of fingermarks on fabrics.
Beerman, Nicole;Savage, Anne;Dennany, Lynn;Fraser, Joanna;
Vol. 59 , No. 5 , pp. 486-497
180 views DOI Abstract
2019
Investigating the effect photodegradation has on natural fibres at a microscopic level.
DeBattista, Roslyn;Tidy, Helen;Clark, Matthew;
Vol. 59 , No. 5 , pp. 498-502
311 views DOI Abstract
2019
What do forensic analysts consider relevant to their decision making?
Gardner, Brett O;Kelley, Sharon;Murrie, Daniel C;Dror, Itiel E;
Vol. 59 , No. 5 , pp. 516-523
198 views DOI Abstract
2019
Management of crime scene units by Quebec police senior managers: Insight on forensic knowledge and understanding of key stakeholders.
Mousseau, Vincent;Baechler, Simon;Crispino, Frank;
Vol. 59 , No. 5 , pp. 524-532
390 views DOI Abstract
2019
A risk-based approach to cognitive bias in forensic science.
Camilleri, Andrew;Abarno, Damien;Bird, Carolyne;Coxon, Anne;Mitchell, Natasha;Redman, Kahlee;Sly, Nicol;Wills, Stephen;Silenieks, Edmund;Simpson, Ellie;Lindsay, Heather;
Vol. 59 , No. 5 , pp. 533-543
342 views DOI Abstract
2019
The repeatability and reproducibility of the Sheffield Features of Gait Tool.
Birch, Ivan;Birch, Maria;Rutler, Lucy;Brown, Sarah;Burgos, Libertad Rodriguez;Otten, Bert;Wiedemeijer, Mickey;
Vol. 59 , No. 5 , pp. 544-551
369 views DOI Abstract
2019
Two-dimensional linear analysis of dynamic bare footprints: A comparison of measurement techniques.
Nirenberg, Michael S;Ansert, Elizabeth;Krishan, Kewal;Kanchan, Tanuj;
Vol. 59 , No. 5 , pp. 552-557
248 views DOI Abstract
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
40
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

39.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.