Special issue on measuring and reporting the precision of forensic likelihood ratios: Introduction to the debate.

Clicks: 441
ID: 51178
2016
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Popular

Ranked #4 of 18 articles by views in Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The present paper introduces the Science & Justice virtual special issue on measuring and reporting the precision of forensic likelihood ratios - whether this should be done, and if so how. The focus is on precision (aka reliability) as opposed to accuracy (aka validity). The topic is controversial and different authors are expected to express a range of nuanced opinions. The present paper frames the debate, explaining the underlying problem and referencing classes of solutions proposed in the existing literature. The special issue will consist of a number of position papers, responses to those position papers, and replies to the responses.
Reference Key
morrison2016specialscience Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart;
Journal Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society
Year 2016
DOI
S1355-0306(16)30026-0
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.