international journal of occupational medicine and environmental health | Journament

Journal Ranking

#181 / 33,934
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
42.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
38
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated vor 4 Tagen

international journal of occupational medicine and environmental health

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexierungen
ncbi doaj ulakbim
Kurzname int j occup med environ health
Abgekürzter Name int j occup med environ health
ISSN 1896-494X
Ziel und Umfang
URL http://ijomeh.eu
Autorenhinweise

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (77 total)

2001
Remediation of metal-contaminated soil and sludge using biosurfactant technology
Maier RM;Neilson JW;Artiola JF;Jordan FL;Glenn EP;Descher SM;;
Vol. 14 , No. 3 , pp. -
493 views Abstract
2014
high prevalence of asymptomatic sexually transmitted infections among men who have sex with men
;Patrick Philibert;Hacène Khiri;Guillaume Pénaranda;Claire Camus;Marie-Pierre Drogoul;Philippe Halfon
Vol. 3 , No. 4 , pp. 1386-1391
404 views DOI Abstract
2016
do alcohol misuse, service utilisation, and demographic characteristics differ between uk veterans and members of the general public attending an nhs general hospital?
;Dominic Murphy;Emily Palmer;Greta Westwood;Walter Busuttil;Neil Greenberg
Vol. 5 , No. 11 , pp. 95-
371 views DOI Abstract
2018
a novel machine learning algorithm to automatically predict visual outcomes in intravitreal ranibizumab-treated patients with diabetic macular edema
;Shao-Chun Chen;Hung-Wen Chiu;Chun-Chen Chen;Lin-Chung Woung;Chung-Ming Lo
Vol. 7 , No. 12 , pp. 475-
360 views DOI Abstract
2019
Occupational burnout and its overlapping effect with depression and anxiety.
Golonka, Krystyna;Mojsa-Kaja, Justyna;Blukacz, Mateusz;Gawłowska, Magda;Marek, Tadeusz;
Vol. 32 , No. 2 , pp. 229-244
344 views DOI Abstract
2016
an evaluation of acylated ghrelin and obestatin levels in childhood obesity and their association with insulin resistance, metabolic syndrome, and oxidative stress
;Maryam Razzaghy-Azar;Mitra Nourbakhsh;Abdolreza Pourmoteabed;Mona Nourbakhsh;Davod Ilbeigi;Mohsen Khosravi
Vol. 5 , No. 7 , pp. 61-
344 views DOI Abstract
2019
The relationship between chronic fatigue syndrome, burnout, job satisfaction, social support and age among academics at a tertiary institution
Coetzee, Nicoleen;Maree, David Jacobus;Smit, Byron Nel;
Vol. 32 , No. 1 , pp. 75-85
339 views Abstract
2019
The role of selected environmental factors and the type of work performed on the development of urolithiasis - a review paper.
Wróbel, Grzegorz;Kuder, Tadeusz;
337 views DOI Abstract
2001
Remediation of metal-contaminated soil and sludge using biosurfactant technology.
R M Maier,J W Neilson,J F Artiola,F L Jordan,E P Glenn,S M Descher;R M Maier;J W Neilson;J F Artiola;F L Jordan;E P Glenn;S M Descher;
Vol. 14 , No. 3 , pp. 1-
321 views
2019
Health risk in road transport workers. Part I. Occupational exposure to chemicals, biomarkers of effect.
Gromadzińska, Jolanta;Wąsowicz, Wojciech;
Vol. 32 , No. 3 , pp. 267-280
312 views DOI Abstract
View All 77 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
38
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.0/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.