Presenting problems in a pilot peer support program: a descriptive study from commercial aviation

Clicks: 6
ID: 338155
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #81 of 83 articles by views in international journal of occupational medicine and environmental health

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Peer support programmes are mandated for commercial pilots in parts of Europe and increasingly promoted internationally, but case-level evidence of effectiveness remains limited. AIMS: To describe presenting problems in a large pilot peer support cohort, examine associations with occupational factors, and assess severity change over an episode of support. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective audit of 830 de-identified peer support cases from a programme serving pilots across 25 airlines in 12 European countries between 2019 and 2025. Presenting concerns were grouped into nine categories for analysis. Associations with sex, job role, and work status were examined, and severity improvement was modelled using logistic regression. RESULTS: Most cases involved male pilots, and the most common concerns were training and checks, relationships, and health-related issues. Severity decreased significantly between entry and closure, with 86% of cases improving and fewer than 1% worsening. Pilots who were unfit for work at programme entry had higher odds of improvement than those in work. Personal relationship cases had lower odds of improvement than training-related cases. CONCLUSIONS: Pilots used peer support mainly for occupational, interpersonal, and health-related stressors rather than acute crisis. Peer support may act as tertiary preventive support within aviation safety systems, although some interpersonal difficulties may be less amenable to short-term peer support alone and may require additional support pathways.
Reference Key
openalex_W7225124931 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors A Bekker, R Bor, Sarah L. Gordon, R Henderson, Q Snyder, C Albuquerque, C Cunha, William R. Hoffman
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal international journal of occupational medicine and environmental health
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/occmed/kqag120
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqag120
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.