Indexed in Journament

Physical Therapy

ISSN 1538-6724· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
34.1 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #10,358 of 29,298 scored journals (34,018 indexed)
103 Articles
Scores higher than 64.6% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Physical Therapy
Abbreviated Name phys ther
ISSN 1538-6724
URL http://ptjournal.apta.org

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Physical Therapy
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.8 30.5
Accessibility 20.0 23.0
Timeliness 90.0 3.0
Diversity 5.6 25.9
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 8.6 5.7
Content Distribution 17.2 89.4
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (103)

2019
Aerobic Exercise Recommendations to Optimize Best Practices in Care After Stroke: AEROBICS 2019 Update.
555 views DOI Abstract
2018
myrianthus arboreus p. beauv (cecropiaceae) extracts accelerates sexual maturation, and increases fertility index and gestational rate in female wistar rats
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. 73-
552 views DOI Abstract
2020
Physical Therapist Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Individuals With Heart Failure.
Vol. 100 , No. 1 , pp. 14-43
490 views DOI Abstract
2015
compositional variation and bioactivity of the leaf essential oil of montanoa guatemalensis from monteverde, costa rica: a preliminary investigation
Vol. 2 , No. 4 , pp. 331-339
480 views DOI Abstract
2019
Development Through the Lens of a Perception-Action-Cognition Connection: Recognizing the Need for a Paradigm Shift in Clinical Reasoning.
Vol. 99 , No. 6 , pp. 748-760
458 views DOI Abstract
2018
understanding the pathological basis of neurological diseases through diagnostic platforms based on innovations in biomedical engineering: new concepts and theranostics perspectives
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 22-
438 views DOI Abstract
2018
dose-dependent effects of green tea or maté extracts on lipid and protein oxidation in brine-injected retail-packed pork chops
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 11-
425 views DOI Abstract
2020
On "Going beyond clinical practice guidelines." Jette AM. Phys Ther. 2020;100:1-2.
418 views DOI
2019
Predictors of Clinical Reasoning Using the Reasoning 4 Change Instrument With Physical Therapist Students.
410 views DOI Abstract
2018
Blended-Learning Pain Neuroscience Education for People With Chronic Spinal Pain: Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial.
Vol. 98 , No. 5 , pp. 357-368
381 views DOI Abstract
2026
Long-Term Clinical Outcomes and Factors Associated With Response in Older Adults With Massive Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears: A Four-Year Prospective Cohort Study
1 views DOI Abstract
2026
Implementation of a Guideline-Based Preference Elicitation Tool to Enhance Shared Decision-Making in Supervised Exercise Therapy for Patients With Intermittent Claudication: A Multi-Methods Cluster Randomized Trial
1 views DOI Abstract
2026
A Single-Number Value Metric Integrating Quality and Cost in Outpatient Physical Therapy
1 views DOI Abstract
2026
Addressing Physical Therapy Access Gaps: Impact of Embedded Scheduling Tools on Patient Language Preference
9 views DOI Abstract
2026
My View of PTJ : Giving Thanks to Peer Reviewers
10 views DOI Abstract
2026
Generative Artificial Intelligence Use in United States Doctor of Physical Therapy Programs
23 views DOI Abstract
2026
Sustained Three-Year Impact of a Physical Therapy Quality Improvement Project in the Medical Intensive Care Unit
14 views DOI Abstract
2026
REmotely monitored, Mobile health-supported Multidomain Rehabilitation with High Intensity Interval Training for COVID-19 (REMM-HIIT-CoV): Trial Design and Rationale
19 views DOI Abstract
2026
Synergistic Effects of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy and Mirror Therapy on Neuroplasticity and Functional Recovery in Rats With Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy
18 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
34.1/100 · Poor
Ranked #10,358 of 29,298 scored
(34,018 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

34.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

8.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

90.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

17.2/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.