Physical Therapy | Journament

Journal Ranking

#6664 / 33,981
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
65
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

Physical Therapy

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name Physical Therapy
Abbreviated Name phys ther
ISSN 1538-6724
Aim and Scope
URL http://ptjournal.apta.org
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (75 total)

2018
myrianthus arboreus p. beauv (cecropiaceae) extracts accelerates sexual maturation, and increases fertility index and gestational rate in female wistar rats
;Charline Florence Awounfack;Marie Alfrede Mvondo;Stéphane Zingue;Sylvin Benjamin Ateba;Sefirin Djiogue;Rosette Megnekou;Derek Tantoh Ndinteh;Dieudonné Njamen
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. 73-
474 views DOI Abstract
2019
Aerobic Exercise Recommendations to Optimize Best Practices in Care After Stroke: AEROBICS 2019 Update.
MacKay-Lyons, Marilyn;Billinger, Sandra A;Eng, Janice J;Dromerick, Alex;Giacomantonio, Nicholas;Hafer-Macko, Charlene;Macko, Richard;Nguyen, Emily;Prior, Peter;Suskin, Neville;Tang, Ada;Thornton, Marianne;Unsworth, Karen;
469 views DOI Abstract
2015
compositional variation and bioactivity of the leaf essential oil of montanoa guatemalensis from monteverde, costa rica: a preliminary investigation
;Victoria D. Flatt;Carlos R. Campos;Maria P. Kraemer;Brittany A. Bailey;Prabodh Satyal;William N. Setzer
Vol. 2 , No. 4 , pp. 331-339
417 views DOI Abstract
2020
Physical Therapist Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Individuals With Heart Failure.
Shoemaker, Michael J;Dias, Konrad J;Lefebvre, Kristin M;Heick, John D;Collins, Sean M;
Vol. 100 , No. 1 , pp. 14-43
395 views DOI Abstract
2018
understanding the pathological basis of neurological diseases through diagnostic platforms based on innovations in biomedical engineering: new concepts and theranostics perspectives
;Laura Ganau;Lara Prisco;Gianfranco K.I. Ligarotti;Rossano Ambu;Mario Ganau
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 22-
365 views DOI Abstract
2019
Development Through the Lens of a Perception-Action-Cognition Connection: Recognizing the Need for a Paradigm Shift in Clinical Reasoning.
Rahlin, Mary;Barnett, Joyce;Becker, Elaine;Fregosi, Charlene M;
Vol. 99 , No. 6 , pp. 748-760
362 views DOI Abstract
2018
dose-dependent effects of green tea or maté extracts on lipid and protein oxidation in brine-injected retail-packed pork chops
;Sisse Jongberg;Mari Ann Tørngren;Leif H. Skibsted
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 11-
355 views DOI Abstract
2019
Predictors of Clinical Reasoning Using the Reasoning 4 Change Instrument With Physical Therapist Students.
Elvén, Maria;Hochwälder, Jacek;Dean, Elizabeth;Söderlund, Anne;
347 views DOI Abstract
2020
On "Going beyond clinical practice guidelines." Jette AM. Phys Ther. 2020;100:1-2.
Shoemaker, Michael J;Cahalin, Lawrence P;Dias, Konrad J;Heick, John D;Davenport, Todd E;Severin, Richard;Collins, Sean M;
328 views DOI
2018
Blended-Learning Pain Neuroscience Education for People With Chronic Spinal Pain: Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial.
Malfliet, Anneleen;Kregel, Jeroen;Meeus, Mira;Roussel, Nathalie;Danneels, Lieven;Cagnie, Barbara;Dolphens, Mieke;Nijs, Jo;
Vol. 98 , No. 5 , pp. 357-368
327 views DOI Abstract
View All 75 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
34
65
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

65.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.