Discharge Decision Making and the Contemporary Weighting of Clinical and Contextual Factors: A Survey of Acute Care Physical Therapists

Clicks: 10
ID: 333478
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #106 of 108 articles by views in Physical Therapy

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
ABSTRACT Importance Physical therapists routinely make discharge recommendations for patients in the hospital, yet the reasoning that drives these decisions is poorly characterized. Objective The objective was to describe contemporary acute care physical therapists’ discharge reasoning and examine associations between reasoning constructs and recommended discharge intensity. Design This study used a cross-sectional clinical vignette-based survey. Therapists provided a discharge recommendation and supporting rationale. Free-text rationales were analyzed using directed content analysis, and quantitative associations between coded reasoning constructs and discharge recommendation intensity were examined using regression modeling. Setting The survey was conducted electronically with United States physical therapists practicing in hospitals. Participants Participants were eighty-nine acute care physical therapists who completed discharge recommendations and free-text rationales for 10 vignettes. Interventions none Main outcomes The three main outcomes for this study included: (1) Frequency and co-occurrence of coded reasoning constructs; (2) therapist-level reasoning profiles; and (3) associations between constructs and discharge intensity. Results Across 1604 construct code applications, 3 constructs dominated discharge reasoning: therapist prior experience (29.6%), patient functioning and disability (26.3%), and patient life context (25.3%). The majority (69.7%) of therapists demonstrated mixed reasoning patterns while less than one-third demonstrated a dominant reasoning profile. Patient functioning and disability was the only construct statistically associated with recommending more intensive post-acute care in ordered (OR = 1.70; 95% CI = 1.22–2.39) and binary (OR = 2.21; 95% CI = 1.30–3.74) models. Conclusions Acute care discharge reasoning concentrates on functional status, professional experience, and patient life context, with other domains functioning mainly as situational amplifiers. Relevance A refined framework for discharge reasoning may support clearer interdisciplinary communication, inform targeted education, and guide efforts to optimize post-acute care utilization.
Reference Key
openalex_W7223202724 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors James P. Crick, Thomas Gus Almonroeder, Tricia L. Widenhoefer
Are you one of these authors? Claim your profile
Journal Physical Therapy
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/ptj/pzag114
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzag114
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.