journal of consulting and clinical psychology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#982 / 33,944
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

journal of consulting and clinical psychology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim soc
Short Name j consult clin psychol
Abbreviated Name j consult clin psychol
ISSN 1939-2117
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/ccp/index.aspx
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (69 total)

2011
a radiographic assessment of the prevalence of pulp stones in patients referred to rafsanjan faculty of dentistry in 2008
;Ahmadi Kohanali J;Zargarpoor R;Kazemizadeh Z
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 28-33
652 views Abstract
2016
evaluation of knowledge, attitudes and performance of the parents of preschool and primary school children referred to health centers of qom city about the importance of preserving primary teeth and its related factors, iran
;Aida Mehdipour;Roshanak Montazeri Hedeshi;Hamid Asayesh;Ali Karimi;Reza Omidi Kopayee;Hossein Asgari
Vol. 10 , No. 6 , pp. 94-105
642 views Abstract
2009
spontaneous resolution of vesicoureteral reflux (vur) in iranian children, a single center experience in 533 cases
;B. Hatamian;M. Ghaffari Shad;H. Zinsaz Boroujerdi;M. Akhavan Sepahi;M. Sharifian
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 49-58
631 views Abstract
2008
consequences of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in qom golpaegani hospital during 2005–7
;J. Mousavi;F. Razavian
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 13-20
479 views Abstract
2016
the mediator role of emotion regulation difficulties in relationship between alexithymia and disordered eating behaviors among students allameh tabataba’i university, iran.
;Mohammad Reza Khodabakhsh;Fariba Kiani
Vol. 10 , No. 2 , pp. 44-51
459 views Abstract
2017
determination of lifestyle and its affecting factors in the elderly over 85 years in supporting centers and organizations of qom province in 2015-2016 (iran)
;arezoo baharori;abolfazl mohamad bagi;narges mohamadsalihi
Vol. 11 , No. 7 , pp. 75-83
440 views Abstract
2016
study of microbial contamination of the public swimming pools with escherichia coli and pseudomonas aeruginosa and their physical parameters in kermanshah, iran
;Afsaneh Haghmorad Korasti;Razieh Nazari;Mohsen Zargar
Vol. 10 , No. 7 , pp. 65-73
410 views Abstract
2011
epidemiologic features of admitted patients with infectious diseases in qom
;Heydari A;Riahin A.A.;Habibi Nejad H.A
Vol. 4 , No. 4 , pp. 54-58
393 views Abstract
2019
Men's misuse of prescription opioids from early to middle adulthood: An examination of developmental and concurrent prediction models.
Capaldi, Deborah M;Kerr, David C R;Tiberio, Stacey S;Owen, Lee D;
Vol. 87 , No. 10 , pp. 893-903
388 views DOI Abstract
2013
application of bone char as an adsorbent for purification of water contaminated with hexavalent chromium
;Ghader Ghanizadeh;Mohammad-Taghi Ghaneian;Ghorban Asgari
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 7-16
388 views Abstract
View All 69 Articles
40
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.3/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.