Indexed in Journament

Journal of affective disorders

ISSN 1573-2517· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
37.3 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #10,732 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
156 Articles
Scores higher than 63.4% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Nome Abreviado J Affect Disord
Nome Abreviado j affect disord
ISSN 1573-2517
URL http://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-affective-disorders

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Journal of affective disorders
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.8 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 60.0 19.2
Diversity 5.6 28.8
Innovation 70.0 31.2
Community Impact 8.6 13.4
Content Distribution 66.6 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (156)

2017
Indices of insulin resistance and glucotoxicity are not associated with bipolar disorder or major depressive disorder, but are differently associated with inflammatory, oxidative and nitrosative biomarkers.
Vol. 222 , pp. 185-194
523 views DOI Abstract
2012
Effects of adjunctive peer support on perceptions of illness control and understanding in an online psychoeducation program for bipolar disorder: a randomised controlled trial
Vol. 142 , No. 1-3 , pp. -
505 views Abstract
2018
Prevalence of Childhood Affective disorders in Turkey: An epidemiological study.
Vol. 238 , pp. 513-521
482 views DOI Abstract
2019
What do patients learn about psychotropic medications on the web? A natural language processing study.
Vol. 260 , pp. 366-371
449 views DOI Abstract
2018
affron, a standardised extract from saffron (Crocus sativus L.) for the treatment of youth anxiety and depressive symptoms: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
Vol. 232 , pp. 349-357
422 views DOI Abstract
2025
Mobile app-based intervention for paternal perinatal depression, anxiety, and stress: A randomised controlled trial.
Vol. 382 , pp. 325-335
128 views DOI Abstract
2025
The relationship between parenting behavior, suicidal ideation, and suicide attempt across two population-based samples of adolescents.
54 views DOI Abstract
2023
Socioeconomic status and depressive symptoms and suicidality: The role of subjective social status.
Vol. 326 , pp. 36-43
213 views DOI Abstract
2023
Predicting bipolar disorder I/II in individuals at clinical high-risk: Results from a systematic review.
132 views DOI Abstract
2021
Does intermittent fasting associated with aerobic training influence parameters related to the gut-brain axis of Wistar rats?
Vol. 293 , pp. -
385 views Abstract
2020
Psychiatric and psychological features of children at high-risk for bipolar disorder.
Vol. 277 , pp. 104-108
299 views DOI Abstract
2020
Improving outcomes for a 3-week intensive treatment program for posttraumatic stress disorder in survivors of military sexual trauma.
Vol. 269 , pp. 134-140
297 views DOI Abstract
2020
A scientometric analysis of suicide research: 1990–2018
Vol. 266 , pp. 356-365
184 views DOI
Journament Score
37.3/100 · Poor
Ranked #10,732 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

37.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

8.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

60.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

66.6/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.