Acta psychologica | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1086 / 33,917
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 day ago

Acta psychologica

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim soc
Short Name Acta Psychol (Amst)
Abbreviated Name acta psychol (amst)
ISSN 1873-6297
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/acta-psychologica
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (36 total)

2019
Causal connectives as indicators of source information: Evidence from the visual world paradigm.
Wei, Yipu;Mak, Willem M;Evers-Vermeul, Jacqueline;Sanders, Ted J M;
Vol. 198 , pp. 102866
378 views DOI Abstract
2020
Attention control ability, mood state, and emotional regulation ability partially affect executive control of attention on task-irrelevant emotional stimuli.
Khosravi, Parmis;Parker, Alyssa J;Shuback, Angela T;Adleman, Nancy E;
Vol. 210 , pp. 103169
372 views DOI Abstract
2010
Priming semantic concepts affects the dynamics of aesthetic appreciation.
Faerber, Stella J;Leder, Helmut;Gerger, Gernot;Carbon, Claus-Christian;
Vol. 135 , No. 2 , pp. 191-200
356 views DOI Abstract
2019
Numerical processing profiles in children with varying degrees of arithmetical achievement.
Estévez-Pérez, Nancy;Castro-Cañizares, Danilka;Martínez-Montes, Eduardo;Reigosa-Crespo, Vivian;
Vol. 198 , pp. 102849
351 views DOI Abstract
2015
The illusion of nonmediation in telecommunication: voice intensity biases distance judgments to a communication partner.
Zhang, Chao;Lakens, Daniël;IJsselsteijn, Wijnand A;
Vol. 157 , pp. 101-5
348 views DOI Abstract
2013
Working memory capacity and dual-task interference in picture naming.
Piai, Vitória;Roelofs, Ardi;
Vol. 142 , No. 3 , pp. 332-42
335 views DOI Abstract
2020
Text segmentation ability predicts future reading efficiency in Spanish-speaking children.
Torres-Díaz, Rosario;Mosquera Suárez, Raysil;Ontivero Ortega, Marlis;Romero Quintana, Yuniel;González Alemañy, Eduardo;Alvarez-Rivero, Aymee;Ojeda Núñez, José A;Peón López, Brenda;Recio Morales, Belkis;Valdés-Sosa, Mitchell;
Vol. 204 , pp. 103015
322 views DOI Abstract
2020
Rhythmic auditory stimuli heard before and during a reaching movement elicit performance improvements in both temporal and spatial movement parameters.
Peters, Carrie M;Glazebrook, Cheryl M;
Vol. 207 , pp. 103086
310 views DOI Abstract
2020
The motor system (partially) deceives body representation biases in absence of visual correcting cues.
Peviani, Valeria;Liotta, Jessica;Bottini, Gabriella;
Vol. 203 , pp. 103003
297 views DOI Abstract
2019
The shape of personal space.
Hecht, Heiko;Welsch, Robin;Viehoff, Jana;Longo, Matthew R;
Vol. 193 , pp. 113-122
287 views DOI Abstract
View All 36 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.