Indexed in Journament

research quarterly for exercise and sport

ISSN 0270-1367· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
29.3 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #21,968 of 29,324 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
18 Articles
Scores higher than 25% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name res q exerc sport
Abbreviated Name res q exerc sport
ISSN 0270-1367
URL https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/urqe20/current

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 5.6 25.8
Innovation 52.5 27.4
Community Impact 8.6 7.8
Content Distribution 83.1 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (18)

2020
The Impact of Partner Performance on Emotions in Doubles Racquet Sports.
Deck, Sarah;Hall, Craig;Wilson, Philip M;
, pp. 1-10
425 views DOI Abstract
2019
Development of the Fitness Education Index: A Scale of Organizational Level Capacity.
Chen, Yen T;Barcelona, Jeanne M;Cance, Jessica Duncan;Calvert, Hannah G;Barnes, Seraphine Pitt;Wargo, Jane;Castelli, Darla M;
, pp. 1-7
425 views DOI Abstract
1997
Making bootstrap statistical inferences: a tutorial.
Zhu, W;
Vol. 68 , No. 1 , pp. 44-55
397 views DOI Abstract
2015
The effects of motivational climate interventions on psychobiosocial States in high school physical education.
Bortoli, Laura;Bertollo, Maurizio;Vitali, Francesca;Filho, Edson;Robazza, Claudio;
Vol. 86 , No. 2 , pp. 196-204
395 views DOI Abstract
2017
Experiences of Individuals With Visual Impairments in Integrated Physical Education: A Retrospective Study.
Haegele, Justin A;Zhu, Xihe;
Vol. 88 , No. 4 , pp. 425-435
385 views DOI Abstract
2020
Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Level 1 Test for Estimation of Peak Oxygen Uptake: Use Without Restriction?
Schmitz, Boris;Pfeifer, Carina;Thorwesten, Lothar;Krüger, Michael;Klose, Andreas;Brand, Stefan-Martin;
, pp. 1-10
359 views DOI Abstract
2019
Work Ability of the Turkish Physical Education Teachers.
Ünlü, Hüseyin;Filiz, Bijen;
, pp. 1-12
354 views DOI Abstract
2019
Physical Activity Indicators, Metabolic Biomarkers, and Comorbidity in Type 2 Diabetes.
Akinci, Buket;Yeldan, Ipek;Celik, Selda;Satman, Ilhan;
, pp. 1-9
344 views DOI Abstract
2015
decolorization of ionic dyes from synthesized textile wastewater by nanofiltration using response surface methodology
;Mehrdad Farhadian;Najmeh Askari;Amir Razmjou
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. 85-92
344 views DOI Abstract
2016
preparation and characterizations of cuo doped zno nano-structure for the photocatalytic degradation of 4-chlorophenol under visible light
;Afsaneh Shokri;Mohsen Mehdipour Ghazi
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 11-24
343 views DOI Abstract
2020
The Impact of Partner Performance on Emotions in Doubles Racquet Sports.
Deck, Sarah;Hall, Craig;Wilson, Philip M;
, pp. 1-10
425 views DOI Abstract
2020
Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Level 1 Test for Estimation of Peak Oxygen Uptake: Use Without Restriction?
Schmitz, Boris;Pfeifer, Carina;Thorwesten, Lothar;Krüger, Michael;Klose, Andreas;Brand, Stefan-Martin;
, pp. 1-10
359 views DOI Abstract
2019
Development of the Fitness Education Index: A Scale of Organizational Level Capacity.
Chen, Yen T;Barcelona, Jeanne M;Cance, Jessica Duncan;Calvert, Hannah G;Barnes, Seraphine Pitt;Wargo, Jane;Castelli, Darla M;
, pp. 1-7
425 views DOI Abstract
2019
Work Ability of the Turkish Physical Education Teachers.
Ünlü, Hüseyin;Filiz, Bijen;
, pp. 1-12
354 views DOI Abstract
2019
Physical Activity Indicators, Metabolic Biomarkers, and Comorbidity in Type 2 Diabetes.
Akinci, Buket;Yeldan, Ipek;Celik, Selda;Satman, Ilhan;
, pp. 1-9
344 views DOI Abstract
2019
The Influence of Motor Competence on Adolescent Identity Health: A Mixed Method Study.
Timler, Amanda;McIntyre, Fleur;Bulsara, Caroline;Rose, Elizabeth;Hands, Beth;
, pp. 1-14
323 views DOI Abstract
2017
evaluation of sequencing batch reactor performance for petrochemical wastewater treatment
;Mina Salari;Seyed Ahmad Ataei;Fereshteh Bakhtiyari
Vol. 3 , No. 3 , pp. 133-137
187 views DOI Abstract
2017
modification of piston bowl geometry and injection strategy, and investigation of egr composition for a dme-burning direct injection engine
;Kianoosh Shojae;Majid Mahdavian
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 1-10
159 views DOI Abstract
2017
employing response surface analysis using for photocatalytic degradation of mtbe by nanoparticles
;Hossein Lotfi;Mohsen Nademi;Mohsen Mansouri;Mohammad Ebrahim Olya
Vol. 2 , No. 3 , pp. 127-135
265 views DOI Abstract
2017
Experiences of Individuals With Visual Impairments in Integrated Physical Education: A Retrospective Study.
Haegele, Justin A;Zhu, Xihe;
Vol. 88 , No. 4 , pp. 425-435
385 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
29.3/100 · Poor
Ranked #21,968 of 29,324 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

29.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

52.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

8.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

83.1/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.