journal of neuroscience methods | Journament

Journal Ranking

#249 / 33,950
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
42.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

journal of neuroscience methods

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name j neurosci methods
Abbreviated Name j neurosci methods
ISSN 0165-0270
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-neuroscience-methods
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (35 total)

2004
EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis.
Delorme, Arnaud;Makeig, Scott;
Vol. 134 , No. 1 , pp. 9-21
367 views Abstract
2016
Nonlinear association criterion, nonlinear Granger causality and related issues with applications to neuroimage studies.
Tao, Chenyang;Feng, Jianfeng;
Vol. 262 , pp. 110-32
360 views DOI Abstract
2019
Early prediction of epileptic seizures using a long-term recurrent convolutional network.
Wei, Xiaoyan;Zhou, Lin;Zhang, Zhen;Chen, Ziyi;Zhou, Yi;
, pp. 108395
337 views DOI Abstract
2020
Automated Segmentation of Acute Stroke Lesions Using a Data-driven Anomaly Detection on Diffusion Weighted MRI.
Nazari-Farsani, Sanaz;Nyman, Mikko;Karjalainen, Tomi;Bucci, Marco;Isojärvi, Janne;Nummenmaa, Lauri;
, pp. 108575
333 views DOI Abstract
1982
Quantitative densitometry of neurotransmitter receptors
Rainbow TC;Bleisch WV;Biegon A;McEwen BS;;
Vol. 5 , No. 1-2 , pp. -
327 views Abstract
1982
Quantitative receptor autoradiography using [3H]ultrofilm: application to multiple benzodiazepine receptors
Unnerstall JR;Niehoff DL;Kuhar MJ;Palacios JM;;
Vol. 6 , No. 1-2 , pp. -
326 views Abstract
2019
Stacked in-plane histology for quantitative validation of non-invasive imaging biomarkers: Application to an infiltrative brain tumour model
Al-Mubarak, H.
Vol. 326 , pp. 0-0
317 views DOI
2019
A Novel Enhanced Softmax Loss Function for Brain Tumour Detection using Deep learning.
Maharjan, Sunil;Alsadoon, Abeer;Prasad, P W C;Salam, Mustafa;Alsadoon, Omar Hisham;
, pp. 108520
314 views DOI Abstract
2020
Modeling drug exposure in rodents using e-cigarettes and other electronic nicotine delivery systems
Miliano, C.
Vol. 330 , pp. 0-0
309 views DOI
2019
A translational framework for peripheral nerve stimulating electrodes: Reviewing the journey from concept to clinic.
Charkhkar, Hamid;Christie, Breanne P;Pinault, Gilles J;Tyler, Dustin J;Triolo, Ronald J;
Vol. 328 , pp. 108414
296 views DOI Abstract
View All 35 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.4/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.