international journal of obesity (2005) | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1247 / 33,950
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

international journal of obesity (2005)

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name int j obes (lond)
Abbreviated Name int j obes (lond)
ISSN 0307-0565
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.nature.com/ijo
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (40 total)

2007
Prenatal androgen excess negatively impacts body fat distribution in a nonhuman primate model of polycystic ovary syndrome
Bruns CM;Baum ST;Colman RJ;Dumesic DA;Eisner JR;Jensen MD;Whigham LD;Abbott DH;;
Vol. 31 , No. 10 , pp. -
365 views Abstract
2020
Anthropometric measures of body fat and obesity-related cancer risk: sex-specific differences in Framingham Offspring Study adults.
Chadid, Susan;Kreger, Bernard E;Singer, Martha R;Loring Bradlee, M;Moore, Lynn L;
362 views DOI Abstract
2005
An application of bootstrap resampling method to obtain confidence interval for percentile fatness cutoff points in childhood and adolescence overweight diagnoses.
Colugnati, F A B;Louzada-Neto, F;Taddei, J A de Aguiar Carrazedo;
Vol. 29 , No. 3 , pp. 340-7
339 views Abstract
2019
Pathways to eating in children and adolescents with obesity.
Clairman, Hayyah;Dettmer, Elizabeth;Buchholz, Annick;Cordeiro, Kristina;Ibrahim, Quazi;Maximova, Katerina;Toulany, Alene;Taylor, Valerie H;Katzman, Debra K;Morrison, Katherine M;Hamilton, Jill;, ;Ball, Geoff;Chanoine, Jean-Pierre;Ho, Josephine;Legault, Laurent;Mackie, Pam;Thabane, Lehana;Zenlea, Ian;
Vol. 43 , No. 6 , pp. 1193-1201
326 views DOI Abstract
2010
multi-market industrial organizational economic models for the internationalization process by small and medium enterprise construction design service firms
;Kerry London
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 210-210
308 views DOI Abstract
2006
Evalution of the castrated male Sprague-Dawley rat as a model of the metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes
Christoffersen B;Raun K;Svendsen O;Fledelius C;Golozoubova V;;
Vol. 30 , No. 8 , pp. -
308 views Abstract
2019
Creating a long-term future for big data in obesity research.
Birkin, Mark;Wilkins, Emma;Morris, Michelle A;
302 views DOI Abstract
2019
Determinants of intramyocellular lipid accumulation in early childhood.
Michael, Navin;Gupta, Varsha;Sadananthan, Suresh Anand;Sampathkumar, Aparna;Chen, Li;Pan, Hong;Tint, Mya Thway;Lee, Kuan Jin;Loy, See Ling;Aris, Izzuddin M;Shek, Lynette Pei-Chi;Yap, Fabian Kok Peng;Godfrey, Keith M;Leow, Melvin K-S;Lee, Yung Seng;Kramer, Michael S;Henry, Christiani Jeyakumar;Fortier, Marielle Valerie;Seng Chong, Yap;Gluckman, Peter D;Karnani, Neerja;Velan, S Sendhil;
298 views DOI Abstract
2010
in quest of total quality management principles in architectural design services: evidence from turkey
;Umut Durmus;H. Cetin Turkcu;H. Murat Gunaydin;Emrah Acar
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. 104-120
250 views DOI Abstract
2007
caracterÍsticas da representaÇÃo 2d e suas limitaÇÕes para a compatibilizaÇÃo espacial
;Rita Cristina Ferreira;Eduardo Toledo Santos
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 36-51
216 views DOI Abstract
View All 40 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.