Indexed in Journament

international journal of obesity (2005)

ISSN 0307-0565· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
32.3 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #19,188 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
40 Articles
Scores higher than 34.6% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name int j obes (lond)
Abbreviated Name int j obes (lond)
ISSN 0307-0565
URL https://www.nature.com/ijo

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.4
Accessibility 20.0
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 5.7
Content Distribution 60.5
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity — 28.8
Innovation 70.0 31.2
Community Impact 5.7 13.4
Content Distribution 60.5 88.4
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (40)

2007
Prenatal androgen excess negatively impacts body fat distribution in a nonhuman primate model of polycystic ovary syndrome
Bruns CM;Baum ST;Colman RJ;Dumesic DA;Eisner JR;Jensen MD;Whigham LD;Abbott DH;;
Vol. 31 , No. 10 , pp. -
423 views Abstract
2020
Anthropometric measures of body fat and obesity-related cancer risk: sex-specific differences in Framingham Offspring Study adults.
Chadid, Susan;Kreger, Bernard E;Singer, Martha R;Loring Bradlee, M;Moore, Lynn L;
415 views DOI Abstract
2005
An application of bootstrap resampling method to obtain confidence interval for percentile fatness cutoff points in childhood and adolescence overweight diagnoses.
Colugnati, F A B;Louzada-Neto, F;Taddei, J A de Aguiar Carrazedo;
Vol. 29 , No. 3 , pp. 340-7
377 views Abstract
2019
Pathways to eating in children and adolescents with obesity.
Clairman, Hayyah;Dettmer, Elizabeth;Buchholz, Annick;Cordeiro, Kristina;Ibrahim, Quazi;Maximova, Katerina;Toulany, Alene;Taylor, Valerie H;Katzman, Debra K;Morrison, Katherine M;Hamilton, Jill;, ;Ball, Geoff;Chanoine, Jean-Pierre;Ho, Josephine;Legault, Laurent;Mackie, Pam;Thabane, Lehana;Zenlea, Ian;
Vol. 43 , No. 6 , pp. 1193-1201
373 views DOI Abstract
2019
Creating a long-term future for big data in obesity research.
Birkin, Mark;Wilkins, Emma;Morris, Michelle A;
360 views DOI Abstract
2006
Evalution of the castrated male Sprague-Dawley rat as a model of the metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes
Christoffersen B;Raun K;Svendsen O;Fledelius C;Golozoubova V;;
Vol. 30 , No. 8 , pp. -
342 views Abstract
2010
multi-market industrial organizational economic models for the internationalization process by small and medium enterprise construction design service firms
;Kerry London
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 210-210
340 views DOI Abstract
2019
Determinants of intramyocellular lipid accumulation in early childhood.
Michael, Navin;Gupta, Varsha;Sadananthan, Suresh Anand;Sampathkumar, Aparna;Chen, Li;Pan, Hong;Tint, Mya Thway;Lee, Kuan Jin;Loy, See Ling;Aris, Izzuddin M;Shek, Lynette Pei-Chi;Yap, Fabian Kok Peng;Godfrey, Keith M;Leow, Melvin K-S;Lee, Yung Seng;Kramer, Michael S;Henry, Christiani Jeyakumar;Fortier, Marielle Valerie;Seng Chong, Yap;Gluckman, Peter D;Karnani, Neerja;Velan, S Sendhil;
333 views DOI Abstract
2010
in quest of total quality management principles in architectural design services: evidence from turkey
;Umut Durmus;H. Cetin Turkcu;H. Murat Gunaydin;Emrah Acar
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. 104-120
290 views DOI Abstract
2007
caracterÍsticas da representaÇÃo 2d e suas limitaÇÕes para a compatibilizaÇÃo espacial
;Rita Cristina Ferreira;Eduardo Toledo Santos
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 36-51
249 views DOI Abstract
2020
Anthropometric measures of body fat and obesity-related cancer risk: sex-specific differences in Framingham Offspring Study adults.
Chadid, Susan;Kreger, Bernard E;Singer, Martha R;Loring Bradlee, M;Moore, Lynn L;
415 views DOI Abstract
2019
Creating a long-term future for big data in obesity research.
Birkin, Mark;Wilkins, Emma;Morris, Michelle A;
360 views DOI Abstract
2019
Pathways to eating in children and adolescents with obesity.
Clairman, Hayyah;Dettmer, Elizabeth;Buchholz, Annick;Cordeiro, Kristina;Ibrahim, Quazi;Maximova, Katerina;Toulany, Alene;Taylor, Valerie H;Katzman, Debra K;Morrison, Katherine M;Hamilton, Jill;, ;Ball, Geoff;Chanoine, Jean-Pierre;Ho, Josephine;Legault, Laurent;Mackie, Pam;Thabane, Lehana;Zenlea, Ian;
Vol. 43 , No. 6 , pp. 1193-1201
373 views DOI Abstract
2019
Determinants of intramyocellular lipid accumulation in early childhood.
Michael, Navin;Gupta, Varsha;Sadananthan, Suresh Anand;Sampathkumar, Aparna;Chen, Li;Pan, Hong;Tint, Mya Thway;Lee, Kuan Jin;Loy, See Ling;Aris, Izzuddin M;Shek, Lynette Pei-Chi;Yap, Fabian Kok Peng;Godfrey, Keith M;Leow, Melvin K-S;Lee, Yung Seng;Kramer, Michael S;Henry, Christiani Jeyakumar;Fortier, Marielle Valerie;Seng Chong, Yap;Gluckman, Peter D;Karnani, Neerja;Velan, S Sendhil;
333 views DOI Abstract
2017
objectile and the “new pretensions” of parametric design in architecture
;Rovenir Bertola Duarte;Malu Magalhães Sanches;Louisa Savignon Lepri
Vol. 12 , No. 3 , pp. 59-76
117 views DOI Abstract
2017
pbl: uma solução para integração e gerenciamento dos diversos tipos de projetos na engenharia civil
;Paulo Adeildo Lopes;Daiana Bragueto Martins
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 53-68
161 views DOI Abstract
2017
reflection on architecture and urbanism teaching in member countries of the arcu-sur system targeting the accreditation process
;Paula Katakura;Francisco Segnini Junior
Vol. 12 , No. 2 , pp. 53-62
222 views DOI Abstract
2016
computational design and simulation of bending-active auxetic structures
;Roberto Naboni;Lorenzo Mirante
Vol. 11 , No. 2 , pp. 59-72
106 views DOI Abstract
2016
the role of the architect in projects supported by bim technology and the skills that should be taught in university
;Maria Bernardete Barison;Eduardo Toledo Santos
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 103-120
203 views DOI Abstract
2016
experiÊncia e parametrizaÇÃo no processo de projeto de aplicaÇÕes digitais interativas
;Cristiane Ellwanger;Vinicius Nunes Rocha e Souza;Alexandre dos Santos Roque;Underléa Miotto Bruscato;Regio Régio Pierre da Silva
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 7-20
141 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
32.3/100 · Poor
Ranked #19,188 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

32.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

60.5/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.