Indexed in Journament

Behavior research methods

ISSN 1554-3528· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
33.3 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #13,194 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
47 Articles
Scores higher than 54.9% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Behav Res Methods
Abbreviated Name behav res methods
ISSN 1554-3528
URL https://www.springer.com/journal/13428

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.7 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 20.4
Timeliness 20.0 5.8
Diversity 16.7 24.4
Innovation 70.0 25.7
Community Impact 7.1 5.8
Content Distribution 64.9 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (47)

2019
LADEC: The Large Database of English Compounds.
Gagné, Christina L;Spalding, Thomas L;Schmidtke, Daniel;
497 views DOI Abstract
2018
Estimating psychological networks and their accuracy: A tutorial paper.
Epskamp, Sacha;Borsboom, Denny;Fried, Eiko I;
Vol. 50 , No. 1 , pp. 195-212
466 views DOI Abstract
2019
The Lancaster Sensorimotor Norms: multidimensional measures of perceptual and action strength for 40,000 English words.
Lynott, Dermot;Connell, Louise;Brysbaert, Marc;Brand, James;Carney, James;
428 views DOI Abstract
2019
Open-source software for mouse-tracking in Qualtrics to measure category competition.
Mathur, Maya B;Reichling, David B;
425 views DOI Abstract
2019
Gorilla in our midst: An online behavioral experiment builder.
Anwyl-Irvine, Alexander L;Massonnié, Jessica;Flitton, Adam;Kirkham, Natasha;Evershed, Jo K;
385 views DOI Abstract
2020
LexOPS: An R package and user interface for the controlled generation of word stimuli.
Taylor, Jack E;Beith, Alistair;Sereno, Sara C;
371 views DOI Abstract
2019
Parallel probability density approximation.
Lin, Yi-Shin;Heathcote, Andrew;Holmes, William R;
359 views DOI Abstract
2018
Direction dependence analysis: A framework to test the direction of effects in linear models with an implementation in SPSS
Wiedermann, W.
Vol. 50 , pp. 1581-1601
355 views DOI
2019
The Litkey Corpus: A richly annotated longitudinal corpus of German texts written by primary school children.
Laarmann-Quante, Ronja;Ortmann, Katrin;Ehlert, Anna;Masloch, Simon;Scholz, Doreen;Belke, Eva;Dipper, Stefanie;
Vol. 51 , No. 4 , pp. 1889-1918
354 views DOI Abstract
2014
ArduiPod Box: a low-cost and open-source Skinner box using an iPod Touch and an Arduino microcontroller.
Pineño, Oskar;
Vol. 46 , No. 1 , pp. 196-205
342 views DOI Abstract
2024
Examining the performance of the chi-square difference test when the unrestricted model is slightly misspecified.
Folk, Dunigan;Savalei, Victoria;
105 views DOI Abstract
2020
Automating creativity assessment with SemDis: An open platform for computing semantic distance.
Beaty, Roger E;Johnson, Dan R;
254 views DOI Abstract
2020
Automatic extraction of subordinate clauses and its application in second language acquisition research.
Chen, Xiaobin;Alexopoulou, Theodora;Tsimpli, Ianthi;
255 views DOI Abstract
2020
LexOPS: An R package and user interface for the controlled generation of word stimuli.
Taylor, Jack E;Beith, Alistair;Sereno, Sara C;
371 views DOI Abstract
2020
Verbal analogy problem sets: An inventory of testing materials.
Ichien, Nicholas;Lu, Hongjing;Holyoak, Keith J;
138 views DOI Abstract
2019
The Lancaster Sensorimotor Norms: multidimensional measures of perceptual and action strength for 40,000 English words.
Lynott, Dermot;Connell, Louise;Brysbaert, Marc;Brand, James;Carney, James;
428 views DOI Abstract
2019
English semantic feature production norms: An extended database of 4436 concepts.
Buchanan, Erin M;Valentine, K D;Maxwell, Nicholas P;
Vol. 51 , No. 4 , pp. 1849-1863
299 views DOI Abstract
2019
Autobiographical recall of personally familiar names and temporal information in e-mails: An automatic analytic approach using e-mail communications
Kumar, A.
Vol. 51 , pp. 1510-1530
212 views DOI
2019
LADEC: The Large Database of English Compounds.
Gagné, Christina L;Spalding, Thomas L;Schmidtke, Daniel;
497 views DOI Abstract
2019
The Litkey Corpus: A richly annotated longitudinal corpus of German texts written by primary school children.
Laarmann-Quante, Ronja;Ortmann, Katrin;Ehlert, Anna;Masloch, Simon;Scholz, Doreen;Belke, Eva;Dipper, Stefanie;
Vol. 51 , No. 4 , pp. 1889-1918
354 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
33.3/100 · Poor
Ranked #13,194 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

33.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

16.7/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

64.9/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.