Examining the performance of the chi-square difference test when the unrestricted model is slightly misspecified.

Clicks: 106
ID: 278620
2024
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #45 of 47 articles by views in Behavior research methods

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Structural equation models are used to model the relationships between latent constructs and observable behaviors such as survey responses. Researchers are often interested in testing nested models to determine whether additional constraints that create a more parsimonious model are also supported by the data. A popular statistical tool for nested model comparison is the chi-square difference test. However, there is some evidence that this test performs suboptimally when the unrestricted model is misspecified. In this paper, we examine the type I error rate of the difference test within the context of single-group confirmatory factor analyses when the less restricted model is misspecified but the constraints imposed by the restricted model are correct. Using empirical simulations and analytic approximations, we find that the chi-square difference test is robust to many but not all forms of realistically sized misspecification in the unrestricted model.
Reference Key
folk2024examiningbehavior Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Folk, Dunigan;Savalei, Victoria;
Journal Behavior research methods
Year 2024
DOI
10.3758/s13428-024-02384-6
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.