the chinese journal of physiology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#5133 / 33,987
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 19 hours ago

the chinese journal of physiology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name chin j physiol
Abbreviated Name chin j physiol
ISSN 0304-4920
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.cjphysiology.org
Author Instructions
Added by Said Nadeem on Jul 03, 2019

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (21 total)

Differential effects of sympatholytic agents on the power spectrum of rats during the cooling-induced hemodynamic perturbations.
Yang, Yung-Nien;Tsai, Hsien-Lung;Lin, Yu-Chieh;Liu, Yia-Ping;Tung, Che-Se;
Vol. 62 , No. 2 , pp. 86-92
356 views DOI Abstract
Differential effects of sympatholytic agents on the power spectrum of rats during the cooling-induced hemodynamic perturbations.
Yang, Yung-Nien;Tsai, Hsien-Lung;Lin, Yu-Chieh;Liu, Yia-Ping;Tung, Che-Se;
Vol. 62 , No. 2 , pp. 86-92
326 views DOI Abstract
Adenine decreases hypertrophic effects through interleukin-18 receptor.
Yang, Yi-Feng;Liang, Yao-Jen;
Vol. 62 , No. 4 , pp. 139-147
316 views DOI Abstract
2017
effect of water stresson trend changesof leaf proline, total soluble sugars, relative water content and soluble protein of two species of pot marigold
;seyyed mousa mousavi;mehrangiz chehrazi;Esmail Khaleghi
Vol. 31 , No. 2 , pp. 365-375
311 views DOI Abstract
2017
evaluation of drought stress effect on growth, essential oil percentage and essential oil yield of chamomile (matricaria recutita l. presov cultivar) and chicory (cichorium intybus l. local cultivar) in the north of khuzestan
;roozbeh farhoudi
Vol. 31 , No. 1 , pp. 122-130
298 views DOI Abstract
2017
effect of different solvents on total phenolic contents and antioxidant activity of zizyphus jujube miller fruits
;Gholamhossein Davarynejad;Seyedeh Faezeh Taghizadeh;Javad Asili
Vol. 31 , No. 1 , pp. 158-166
287 views DOI Abstract
2017
evaluation of paclobutrazol spraying on salinity hardiness of peach- almond hybrid (gf677) rootstock
;azam amiri;Bahram Baninasab
Vol. 30 , No. 2 , pp. 260-269
286 views DOI Abstract
2016
the effect of phosphorus and zinc fertilizers on nutrient content and essential oil yield of german chamomile under drought stress (matricaria recutita l.)
;M. Ghaedi Jeshni;M. Mousavinik;J. Aminifar
Vol. 29 , No. 4 , pp. 642-651
273 views DOI Abstract
2017
effects of salicylic acid on some morphophysiological characteristics of border flowers from asteraceae family under water deficit
;majid zargarian;Ali Tehranifar;Hossein Nematy;Bahram syavashpor
Vol. 30 , No. 1 , pp. 151-162
264 views DOI Abstract
2017
evaluatingthe changesinsome physical and chemical properties of olive fruit during storage
;roohallah montaghemi rad;ebrahim ahmadi;hassan sarikhani
Vol. 30 , No. 2 , pp. 192-200
263 views DOI Abstract
View All 21 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.0/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.