Indexed in Journament

the chinese journal of physiology

ISSN 0304-4920· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
35.6 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #14,643 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
21 Articles
Scores higher than 50% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name chin j physiol
Abbreviated Name chin j physiol
ISSN 0304-4920
URL https://www.cjphysiology.org

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for the chinese journal of physiology
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.9 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity 55.6 28.8
Innovation 52.5 31.2
Community Impact 7.1 13.4
Content Distribution 71.4 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (21)

Differential effects of sympatholytic agents on the power spectrum of rats during the cooling-induced hemodynamic perturbations.
Vol. 62 , No. 2 , pp. 86-92
381 views DOI Abstract
Adenine decreases hypertrophic effects through interleukin-18 receptor.
Vol. 62 , No. 4 , pp. 139-147
353 views DOI Abstract
2017
effect of water stresson trend changesof leaf proline, total soluble sugars, relative water content and soluble protein of two species of pot marigold
Vol. 31 , No. 2 , pp. 365-375
352 views DOI Abstract
Differential effects of sympatholytic agents on the power spectrum of rats during the cooling-induced hemodynamic perturbations.
Vol. 62 , No. 2 , pp. 86-92
346 views DOI Abstract
2017
effect of different solvents on total phenolic contents and antioxidant activity of zizyphus jujube miller fruits
Vol. 31 , No. 1 , pp. 158-166
307 views DOI Abstract
2017
evaluation of paclobutrazol spraying on salinity hardiness of peach- almond hybrid (gf677) rootstock
Vol. 30 , No. 2 , pp. 260-269
305 views DOI Abstract
2017
evaluatingthe changesinsome physical and chemical properties of olive fruit during storage
Vol. 30 , No. 2 , pp. 192-200
284 views DOI Abstract
2017
effects of salicylic acid on some morphophysiological characteristics of border flowers from asteraceae family under water deficit
Vol. 30 , No. 1 , pp. 151-162
283 views DOI Abstract
2018
effects of vegetative and seedling pear rootstocks on growth characteristics and water potential of pear cultivar
Vol. 31 , No. 4 , pp. 705-721
235 views DOI Abstract
2017
determination of chilling and heat requirement of four apricot cultivars of khorasan razavi province
Vol. 30 , No. 3 , pp. 431-438
184 views DOI Abstract
2017
impact of potassium foliar application in alleviating the harmful effects of salinity in spinach
Vol. 30 , No. 2 , pp. 201-208
210 views DOI Abstract
2017
effect of different solvents on total phenolic contents and antioxidant activity of zizyphus jujube miller fruits
Vol. 31 , No. 1 , pp. 158-166
307 views DOI Abstract
2017
effects of nitrogen and nutrient removal on nitrate accumulation and growth characteristics of spinach (spinacia oleraceae l.)
Vol. 31 , No. 2 , pp. 306-314
205 views DOI Abstract
2017
orphological evaluation and classification of melon genotypes in khorasan provinces (razavi, north and south)
Vol. 30 , No. 4 , pp. 605-615
219 views DOI Abstract
2017
predicting the impact of urban green areas on microclimate changes of mashhad residential areas during the hottest period
Vol. 30 , No. 3 , pp. 537-546
223 views DOI Abstract
2017
evaluation of paclobutrazol spraying on salinity hardiness of peach- almond hybrid (gf677) rootstock
Vol. 30 , No. 2 , pp. 260-269
305 views DOI Abstract
2017
effect of cycocel and salisilic acid on morphologic traits of brassica oleracea, pink type
Vol. 30 , No. 4 , pp. 590-596
190 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
35.6/100 · Poor
Ranked #14,643 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

35.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

55.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

52.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

71.4/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.